Jump to content

European Union announces Iranian oil ban over nuclear program concerns


News_Editor

Recommended Posts


Yes it will cause lots of death and destruction, you wonder what's going through the minds of leaders in the west (not that It's really them that call the shots)

And arms companies like the Carlyle Group in the US will defo benefit from any future war(s). Funnily enough both George Bush Snr and George W Bush are major shareholders in the group !! War afterall has and always will be big business in the US, no matter who gets hurt, It's all about $

I am curious to know where you obtained your information that the Carlyle Group is an 'arms' company. The Carlyle Group is a private asset management firm.

You might want to provide some sort of data to support your statement that GHWB and GWB are 'major shareholders' as you so state.

Please clarify your statements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have read today the Iranian parliament votes on whether to stop selling oil to Europe from today, instead of waiting for E.U sanctions to kick in by July. Everything Iran does supports the theory that they actually desire escalation of events to fulfill their own messianic prophecies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have read today the Iranian parliament votes on whether to stop selling oil to Europe from today, instead of waiting for E.U sanctions to kick in by July. Everything Iran does supports the theory that they actually desire escalation of events to fulfill their own messianic prophecies.

I do not follow your thinking in this claim.............

If other countries decide to sanction economically or decide not to sell their products to another how is that a desire to be bombed?

Yet where is the infraction? Where is the desire to escalate an unprovoked attack?

Others will have to realize it is in fact as always a two way street.

A country can decide to isolate themselves from what they deem hostilities directed at them.

They can choose who they sell THEIR products to.

It is not economically wise yes but it is their choice to make.

Is it not laughable that one may threaten not to buy...........That is fine

Yet when someone threatens back at the very same that made the threat not to buy...with......go away we don't want to sell to you anyway...

That is a problem?

Edited by flying
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have read today the Iranian parliament votes on whether to stop selling oil to Europe from today, instead of waiting for E.U sanctions to kick in by July. Everything Iran does supports the theory that they actually desire escalation of events to fulfill their own messianic prophecies.

I do not follow your thinking in this claim.............

Shi'as believe that Imam al-Mahdi - their savior - will reappear when the world has fallen into chaos and civil war and they are encouraged to bring it about. That is why the Iranian regime is so dangerous. They want to bring the world to its knees for religious reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most amusing is that it appears that the European ban on Iranian oil will take place fully from 1st July with various contracts being phased out gradually, particularly for Greece who are heavily reliant on Iranian oil. Iran should just turn around and say . all deals off, the ban starts today, go elsewhere for your oil. That would through the ball squarely back in the face of the Eurocrats.

They'd never do that as they'd shoot themselves right in the foot. Iran sustains itself on oil sales so unless China comes along and says 'we'll take it' (they'd need some stones), they'll have to suck it up.

Well, actually in Iran they discuss about doing this- halt oil sales to Europe. And they discuss about this in the parliament, so it will be not just a decision made by some Council of Ministers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything Iran does supports the theory that they actually desire escalation of events to fulfill their own messianic prophecies.

I do not follow your thinking in this claim.............

Shi'as believe that Imam al-Mahdi - their savior - will reappear when the world has fallen into chaos and civil war and they are encouraged to bring it about. That is why the Iranian regime is so dangerous. They want to bring the world to its knees for religious reasons.

Tales of an apocalypse are part in the belief system of all Abrahamic religions.

Some Christian nutters belief that Iran wants to trigger the doomsday and will bring the world to end. But that is only an argument these Christian nutters use to "prove" that their vision of an apocalypse is true and real.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most amusing is that it appears that the European ban on Iranian oil will take place fully from 1st July with various contracts being phased out gradually, particularly for Greece who are heavily reliant on Iranian oil. Iran should just turn around and say . all deals off, the ban starts today, go elsewhere for your oil. That would through the ball squarely back in the face of the Eurocrats.

They'd never do that as they'd shoot themselves right in the foot. Iran sustains itself on oil sales so unless China comes along and says 'we'll take it' (they'd need some stones), they'll have to suck it up.

Well, actually in Iran they discuss about doing this- halt oil sales to Europe. And they discuss about this in the parliament, so it will be not just a decision made by some Council of Ministers.

In Iran, the Majlis (Parliament) votes on issues. They are then forwarded to the Guardian Council (12 Islamic Judges). If the Council approves the legislation it is then forwarded to the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. If he approves it, the legislation or decree becomes law. If he does not approve it, the issue is dead.

The process is, in fact, one man control.

Please don't paint it out to be some major democratic process. It isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most amusing is that it appears that the European ban on Iranian oil will take place fully from 1st July with various contracts being phased out gradually, particularly for Greece who are heavily reliant on Iranian oil. Iran should just turn around and say . all deals off, the ban starts today, go elsewhere for your oil. That would through the ball squarely back in the face of the Eurocrats.

They'd never do that as they'd shoot themselves right in the foot. Iran sustains itself on oil sales so unless China comes along and says 'we'll take it' (they'd need some stones), they'll have to suck it up.

Well, actually in Iran they discuss about doing this- halt oil sales to Europe. And they discuss about this in the parliament, so it will be not just a decision made by some Council of Ministers.

In Iran, the Majlis (Parliament) votes on issues. They are then forwarded to the Guardian Council (12 Islamic Judges). If the Council approves the legislation it is then forwarded to the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. If he approves it, the legislation or decree becomes law. If he does not approve it, the issue is dead.

The process is, in fact, one man control.

Please don't paint it out to be some major democratic process. It isn't.

Sounds a similar process to the USA, where one man seems to have veto over most things!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most amusing is that it appears that the European ban on Iranian oil will take place fully from 1st July with various contracts being phased out gradually, particularly for Greece who are heavily reliant on Iranian oil. Iran should just turn around and say . all deals off, the ban starts today, go elsewhere for your oil. That would through the ball squarely back in the face of the Eurocrats.

They'd never do that as they'd shoot themselves right in the foot. Iran sustains itself on oil sales so unless China comes along and says 'we'll take it' (they'd need some stones), they'll have to suck it up.

I have no love for the Israeli psyche, but you can appreciate their position in this, when a nearby state publically wishes to see them flattened. To be fair, it could all do with kicking off anyhow. Good year for it, and for China-India to forgo half their populace.. think of all that spare air. giggle.gif

Well it seems like they may do that!!

http://www.speroforum.com/a/NTVFEOLKVG39/67531-Iran-To-Vote-On-Blocking-Oil-Deliveries-To-Europe

What makes me laugh is the following quote

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle warned in the hours ahead of the planned Iranian vote that the EU would not allow Iran to push it into a corner with the tactic.

Westerwelle called the threat "a regrettable and dangerous escalation in rhetoric," saying the EU would find ways "to compensate for delivery stoppages."

So Germany can lead a European motion to boycott Iranian oil in 6 months, so everyone can conveniently find alternative suppliers before they shaft Iran, but when Iran come back and say 'fair enough, well ram it, as of today", everyone seems surprised and upset. Mind boggling!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Germany can lead a European motion to boycott Iranian oil in 6 months, so everyone can conveniently find alternative suppliers before they shaft Iran, but when Iran come back and say 'fair enough, well ram it, as of today", everyone seems surprised and upset. Mind boggling!

Exactly!

But of course it is not seen as their choice to fire their customers.

Instead it is seen by those who started it all as an aggressive action...or more exactly..."a regrettable and dangerous escalation in rhetoric,"

Edited by flying
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, actually in Iran they discuss about doing this- halt oil sales to Europe. And they discuss about this in the parliament, so it will be not just a decision made by some Council of Ministers.

In Iran, the Majlis (Parliament) votes on issues. They are then forwarded to the Guardian Council (12 Islamic Judges). If the Council approves the legislation it is then forwarded to the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. If he approves it, the legislation or decree becomes law. If he does not approve it, the issue is dead.

The process is, in fact, one man control.

Please don't paint it out to be some major democratic process. It isn't.

Sounds a similar process to the USA, where one man seems to have veto over most things!

A veto can be overridden with a 2/3rd vote by Congress. If anybody tries to override the Supreme Leader, they will be executed.

Not even close to similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 179

      Best Song of Past 100 Years? Your Vote?

    2. 26

      Investment for income stream for a Thai

    3. 212

      How to retire in Thailand

    4. 67

      Any benefits in antibiotics

    5. 0

      Rising Baht Sparks Fears of Another 'Tom Yam Kung' Crisis

    6. 0

      Campaigners Urge Handout Recipients to Avoid Alcohol Amid Payout Uncertainty

    7. 0

      Denmark Considers Importing Medications from Thailand and Asia to Cut Costs

    8. 0

      Destination Thailand Visa Sparks Interest, Faces Future Hurdles

    9. 6,578

      Australian Aged Pension

    10. 30

      Expert Urges Government To Raise Tax For Foreign Condo Buyers

    11. 626

      I Love Donald Trump

    12. 23

      Change from 800,000 in bank to using income and money in bank

    13. 51

      Thai Baht is ruining my retirement

×
×
  • Create New...
""