Yeah, yeah, your buddy and his mates put bullets in many innocents, they were runnings guns and fighting other people's wars for money. The would not share lands with indigenous people, they are better off else where with all their conniving black zimbabwean.

Edited April 13, 201214 yr by MegaRanter

they were runnings guns and fighting other people's wars for money.

Really ? pray tell, or are you just pulling these remarks out of your bottom ?

Futher the number of innocents who may or may not have had bullets in them would be a very small number indeed in comparsion to the number of bullets Uncle Bob had put in people during his tyranny...but guess in your opinion this is ok as he was killing his "own" people ?

Edited April 13, 201214 yr by Soutpeel

they were runnings guns and fighting other people's wars for money.

Really ? pray tell, or are you just pulling these remarks out of your bottom ?

Futher the number of innocents who may or may not have had bullets in them would be a very small number indeed in comparsion to the number of bullets Uncle Bob had put in people during his tyranny...but guess in your opinion this is ok as he was killing his "own" people ?

LoL! "May or may not have had bullets put in them" Really? WoW. Anyway, however many died in the internal Zimbabwean struggle with Mugabe is the result of nation building. The price to go from oppression and Tyranny to functional self governing has always been paid in Time and Blood. Why should Zimbabwe be any different. But at least because of him they are on that path. The occupiers had the chance to negotiate, but even against the wishes of their South African allies in apartheid, they remained staunchly opposed to any power sharing deals with the Africans they were terrorizing.

So, that said, Better to be free and fighting to build a better quality of life, then to live a long life as a slave in your own homeland.

It seems that the topic has continued to deteriorate into a slinging match between posters.

//Closed//