Calling every disagreement "antisemitic" is a convenient substitute for an actual argument. 🙄 Yes, Israel survived 1948, 1967, 1973, 1982, and 2006. It also received enormous military, financial, and diplomatic backing from the United States throughout much of that history. That's not an insult, it's simply historical fact. Those wars weren't fought in a vacuum. And "won"? That depends on the definition. Tactical battlefield victories don't automatically become long-term strategic victories. Israel won battles against Hezbollah in 2006? That's still debated by military analysts, considering Hezbollah remained intact and far more heavily armed afterward. The same question applies today: if your objective is lasting security, the scorecard is more complicated than pointing to wars fought decades ago. As for Iran, nobody knows how this ends. But dismissing it because it isn't charging across the border with tanks misses the point. Modern warfare increasingly revolves around missiles, drones, proxies, economics, cyber operations, and attrition. Objectively-speaking, Iran likely has stockpiles that the US and .rael can only dream of. Maybe that's why their "obliterated" military is still fighting back. Whether that strategy succeeds is an open question, but pretending it's impossible isn't analysis; it's wishful thinking. History has a habit of embarrassing people who assume today's military advantage guarantees tomorrow's outcome. I get my news from as many sources as I can find... from both sides.