Sleeping Drunk Dutchman Robbed By Greedy Gays

A 50-year-old Dutch tourist sleeping in front of a KFC on Beach Road was robbed by two gays of his cellphone and motorbike key. Witnesses called police, who arrested the gays. The pair said they first tried to wake the man, then decided to steal his stuff.

PATTAYA – August 24, 2012 [PDN]; at 6 a.m., a theft of a drunken tourist by two gays was reported to Pol. Lt. Vitsanu Chaisuwan, Deputy Inspector, Pattaya police station, Chonburi province.

He rushed to the scene with a police team in front of the KFC shop at the Royal Garden Plaza shopping complex on Pattaya Beach Road, Moo 9 Tambon Nong Preu, Amphur Banglamung, Chonburi province.

Witnesses told police that two gays had just stolen the phone of a drunk foreign tourist sleeping outside the KFC restaurant. Police then caught up to the two thieves and arrested them at the Soi Welcome Hotel Pattaya on Second Road.

They were identified as Mr. Veerasak or TonThongdaeng, age 29, address 92 Moo 5 Tambon Thaipattana, Amphur Phusing, Srisaket province; and Mr. Raklae or Tam Thongmak, age 31, address 26 Moo 7 Tambon Nongbua, Amphur Baankai, Rayong province.

Police searched the body of Mr. Veerasak and found a iPhone 4S belonging to the victim. The thieves had switched off the phone and took out the SIM card, which was found in the bag of Mr. Raklae. When police searched Mr. Raklae’s body, they found a motorbike key taken from the victim’s pants pocket.

Full story: http://www.pattayada...by-greedy-gays/

-- Pattaya Daily News 2012-08-24

Great headline.

Naughty gays indeed, need a dam_n good spanking.

Poetic headline. Moral of the story, don't get so drunk you drop off in the street.

Sons of soi bitches!!

So drunk that he never knew his property was stolen till police told him !!! Luckily there are honest people around!

Hang on,I thought the BiB were all corrupt and lazy and only helped if you paid them?

I thought only Norwegian and U.K men were drunk.Must had a rough night.

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

Edited August 24, 201213 yr by Jingthing

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

If their sexuality doesn't matter then why do you say their gender matters. Why not 'robbed by two human beings'?

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

Maybe THEY insisted on the title as it's their 'identity '

"Hollander " :lol::lol:

Sent from my GT-P1010 using Thaivisa Connect App

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

If their sexuality doesn't matter then why do you say their gender matters. Why not 'robbed by two human beings'?

Standard practice. Men and women have different general appearances. This also brings up nationality. In a tourist resort, it is relevant to mention the nationality of the victim. The nationality of the thieves is somewhat assumed to be Thai unless otherwise stated. So if the thieves had been Iranians you would expect that in the headline or lead. The detail that the thieves were gay if mentioned at all, should definitely not have been in the headline or lead, except in the case of a yellow journalism rag. They know there is more reader interest to bring something about SEX into a story that had nothing to do with sex.

The human being suggestion is totally ridiculous so not even going to bother responding to that specifically. However it does bring up the issue of RACE in these kinds of news stories. Should (minority) race be mentioned in the headline or lead of such news stories?

Edited August 24, 201213 yr by Jingthing

Maybe THEY insisted on the title as it's their 'identity '

...

Not likely.

Haha, a few years ago I did the same thing outside MacDonalds on 2nd road, at a similar time of day. 2 ladyboys picked up my phone, filmed me snoring in a feotal position on the chair, and gave my phone to the staff inside.

I woke up in a wild panic, only for the staff to hand me my phone. It was a few days later when I saw the video, p!ssed myself laughing when I watched that. Shame they didn't film themselves so I could have found them and given them some reward (this was near the library soi, so they would have been easy to track down).

Anyway, definitive proof that honest ladyboys are more reliable than 'greedy gays'

always funny to see they post the full name, address and hobbies of the criminals here, but no picture ?

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

For once I totally agree with you.

I didnt know gays in pattaya had a sign on their face saying I AM GAY ..... big presumption in this article ...very sexist as well ... maybe the "journalist" doesnt like gays ...

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

Exactly my thoughts. GUTTER journalism. Disgusting. Tells us something about those who write (and spread) it.

Edited August 24, 201213 yr by pointoffew

I thought only Norwegian and U.K men were drunk.Must had a rough night.

You've obviously not met Americans, Aussies, Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Indians, Germans, Danes, Swedes etc etc etc.

Get the point - drunks are not just from two countries.

Two gays... Two gays.... Two gays...

That kind of reporting is really.... Too gay...

Good thing they did want a date from him

Good job they didn't really shaft him.

Imaybe the "journalist" doesnt like gays ...

You think ????

I keep on believing the Pattaya press has reached rock bottom, but they can still surprise - there can't be much left in the bottom of that particular barrel.

hey if it had been a Dutch lesbian would it have read

"Gay boys finger dyke" geddit!!

Inflammatory post and quoted reply removed

Hang on,I thought the BiB were all corrupt and lazy and only helped if you paid them?

wait 'til you learn who took the drunk's other, dearer cell phone ...

Edited August 24, 201213 yr by thurien

I thought only Norwegian and U.K men were drunk.Must had a rough night.

Try Florida for "Spring Break". Drunken students everywhere.

"Greedy gays" is one of the best expression I have ever read!

Will the Pattaya Daily News kindly note the heterosexual orientation of all offenders please (as far as known). Here's a hint; Should be the majority.Thanks!

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

Horrible yellow journalism.

Their sexuality had nothing to with this story.

The Dutchman was robbed by two MEN.

If the thieves had been straight, would the headline had said robbed by two STRAIGHTS?

First time I have ever heard gays used in that kind of irrelevant context.

Before you get your panties in a twist, no this is not the same as if the thieves had been ladyboys.

Why? Because ladyboys present as women so their appearance is so distinctive that it is objective to mention it. Look at the picture in the story. These are two men. One might look a bit effeminate but not more than many Thai straight men.

Now if the Hollander had invited the men to his room for a threesome, THEN the mention of the sexual aspect of the story would have been relevant.

Maybe THEY insisted on the title as it's their 'identity '

"Hollander "

Sent from my GT-P1010 using Thaivisa Connect App

Maybe the keys were not in his pocket.

Those Dutchies , where ever they go , they always know how to have a good time.