theblether Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 @Smokie Put him in a combination between 7 and 9 ... I think will have heavy flak coming my way when he returns to TV as I've already made some minor statements about his.... his... preference... Yes......you're a dead man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxme Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 @Smokie Put him in a combination between 7 and 9 ... I think will have heavy flak coming my way when he returns to TV as I've already made some minor statements about his.... his... preference... Yes......you're a dead man. Uh oh... I see it's time to go to work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblether Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 21) theblether A category all of his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villagefarang Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 Someone should approach George about incorporating this new rating system. Maybe not a self assigned number but the number most people assign to you. Like numbers have become completely unmanageable with rumors that someone may break 10,000 soon. I wonder what number this post makes me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxme Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 21) theblether A category all of his own. Ahem so even though I've already posted as to what 21 is you are sure you want to classify yourself as stated? Fine by me 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 I'm not sure if young applies to you but confused certainly does as there about to be both young and old on each side of the border. 21) Predict or assume something is fact without verifying it Perhaps this one suits you better Jesus where do I say there are no young TVisa members in Thailand!!.......are you a 4) ? No because that would go along with 6 and 9 but more like 7 but now when I think of it I would classify you as a 13. Are you with me so far? I'll take 13...no issues for me to be everything to all things, I decided a long time ago I would never be perfect, easier to exceed personal expectation that way....keeps a man happy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayayay Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 Having too much time on their hands 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 21) theblether A category all of his own. indeed, a legend in his own mind. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblether Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 Someone should approach George about incorporating this new rating system. Maybe not a self assigned number but the number most people assign to you. Like numbers have become completely unmanageable with rumors that someone may break 10,000 soon. I wonder what number this post makes me? Number one in my book......can I get a like for that please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villagefarang Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 Someone should approach George about incorporating this new rating system. Maybe not a self assigned number but the number most people assign to you. Like numbers have become completely unmanageable with rumors that someone may break 10,000 soon. I wonder what number this post makes me? Number one in my book......can I get a like for that please? I’m sorry but for Buddhist Lent I have given up handing out “likes” to bletherers. It was the only bad habit that I thought I could do without and would make me the most merit at the same time. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblether Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 Someone should approach George about incorporating this new rating system. Maybe not a self assigned number but the number most people assign to you. Like numbers have become completely unmanageable with rumors that someone may break 10,000 soon. I wonder what number this post makes me? Number one in my book......can I get a like for that please? I’m sorry but for Buddhist Lent I have given up handing out “likes” to bletherers. It was the only bad habit that I thought I could do without and would make me the most merit at the same time. That's shocking. I'll be expecting some compensatory likes once Lent finishes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblether Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 Someone should approach George about incorporating this new rating system. Maybe not a self assigned number but the number most people assign to you. Like numbers have become completely unmanageable with rumors that someone may break 10,000 soon. I wonder what number this post makes me? Number one in my book......can I get a like for that please? I’m sorry but for Buddhist Lent I have given up handing out “likes” to bletherers. It was the only bad habit that I thought I could do without and would make me the most merit at the same time. That's shocking. I'll be expecting some compensatory likes once Lent finishes So will power is not one of your strong points vf??? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokie36 Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 Villagefarang must be on the Lao Khao today! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villagefarang Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 (edited) That's shocking. I'll be expecting some compensatory likes once Lent finishes So will power is not one of your strong points vf??? I'm sorry, I forgot I'm not Buddhist. Edited September 2, 2012 by villagefarang 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblether Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 That's shocking. I'll be expecting some compensatory likes once Lent finishes So will power is not one of your strong points vf??? I'm sorry, I forgot I'm not Buddhist. Brilliant ...... right I'm away to work. Don't forget me when I'm gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draftvader Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 There is a simple methodology available to TV, but implementation is fraught with issues and would have to be VERY well managed. Number of posts/Likes This will show who posts the most respected posts. The main problem with this filter system would be the threshold it needs to be set at. There would need to be 2 thresholds: Limiting who can use the system (i.e. only people with over a certain quality level) Limiting the availability of the filter (i.e. only available through advanced search) This would allow for people to filter a thread to the point where they could actually get useful information from it, a sort of "best of ThaiVisa" function. The biggest issue would be that people would ONLY use this system and this would not allow new posters to gain any ground. If anybody can create a solution to this issue then I think that this is a flyer and the data is already in place to allow this "quality" field to be created using a server script. Anyway, my tech ramblings are generally better on a Monday morning when I am actually facing my work. This might have come out in the wrong order Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrry Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 I’m sorry but for Buddhist Lent I have given up handing out “likes” to bletherers. It was the only bad habit that I thought I could do without and would make me the most merit at the same time. That's shocking. I'll be expecting some compensatory likes once Lent finishes So will power is not one of your strong points vf??? It is the won't power that is missing in vf's case. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 what a load of back slapping twaddle 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigeonjake Posted September 2, 2012 Share Posted September 2, 2012 There is a simple methodology available to TV, but implementation is fraught with issues and would have to be VERY well managed. Number of posts/Likes This will show who posts the most respected posts. The main problem with this filter system would be the threshold it needs to be set at. There would need to be 2 thresholds: Limiting who can use the system (i.e. only people with over a certain quality level) Limiting the availability of the filter (i.e. only available through advanced search) This would allow for people to filter a thread to the point where they could actually get useful information from it, a sort of "best of ThaiVisa" function. The biggest issue would be that people would ONLY use this system and this would not allow new posters to gain any ground. If anybody can create a solution to this issue then I think that this is a flyer and the data is already in place to allow this "quality" field to be created using a server script. confused!!!!!!!!! that would be me, and you have just proven my point, or it could be that im just thick,, but then again im a happy confused thicko, jake Anyway, my tech ramblings are generally better on a Monday morning when I am actually facing my work. This might have come out in the wrong order Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigeonjake Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 point proven, i couldnt even get the last post right, jake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onionluke Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Why not provide a simple rating system , while the discussion rages on ? It could be number of posts divided by number of likes , multiplied by your chosen definition number with a colour code system . Or the other way about too . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patroller Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 A few dots short of a dice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 or we could just discern for ourselves whether or not what we are reading is crap 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Pseudolus Posted September 3, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted September 3, 2012 Why not provide a simple rating system , while the discussion rages on ? It could be number of posts divided by number of likes , multiplied by your chosen definition number with a colour code system . Or the other way about too . Well they do in a way. If you look at your profile, you will see on the right hand side the amount of "Likes" you have received. I, person who is most likely on the "he is a prat" list of most members (and Mods, if I am honest about these things), have a rating of 1014 Likes, classed as "Excellent" from 1612 posts. You have 150 Likes, also rated Excellent, but from 1435 posts. My arch nemesis (this month anyway) has a 308 Likes, rated at excellent as well (must be very low quality control on this rating word) from 1663 posts. No need for a lot of reprogramming by the mods - these numbers say it all perhaps. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onionluke Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Why not provide a simple rating system , while the discussion rages on ? It could be number of posts divided by number of likes , multiplied by your chosen definition number with a colour code system . Or the other way about too . Well they do in a way. If you look at your profile, you will see on the right hand side the amount of "Likes" you have received. I, person who is most likely on the "he is a prat" list of most members (and Mods, if I am honest about these things), have a rating of 1014 Likes, classed as "Excellent" from 1612 posts. You have 150 Likes, also rated Excellent, but from 1435 posts. My arch nemesis (this month anyway) has a 308 Likes, rated at excellent as well (must be very low quality control on this rating word) from 1663 posts. No need for a lot of reprogramming by the mods - these numbers say it all perhaps. Excellent stuff , you have got it in the bag . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Why not provide a simple rating system , while the discussion rages on ? It could be number of posts divided by number of likes , multiplied by your chosen definition number with a colour code system . Or the other way about too . Well they do in a way. If you look at your profile, you will see on the right hand side the amount of "Likes" you have received. I, person who is most likely on the "he is a prat" list of most members (and Mods, if I am honest about these things), have a rating of 1014 Likes, classed as "Excellent" from 1612 posts. You have 150 Likes, also rated Excellent, but from 1435 posts. My arch nemesis (this month anyway) has a 308 Likes, rated at excellent as well (must be very low quality control on this rating word) from 1663 posts. No need for a lot of reprogramming by the mods - these numbers say it all perhaps. Excellent stuff , you have got it in the bag . Hope it's a BigMac. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StreetCowboy Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 (edited) That's shocking. I'll be expecting some compensatory likes once Lent finishes So will power is not one of your strong points vf??? I'm sorry, I forgot I'm not Buddhist. Apparently we're all buddhist http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/580783-we-are-all-buddhist/ From too much living in Thailand SC EDIT Of course, those of us who have been here since before time began - like.. well, Transam, anyway, remember that "Likes" are a fairly recent invention for the entertainment of us young whippersnappers Edited September 3, 2012 by StreetCowboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblether Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Why not provide a simple rating system , while the discussion rages on ? It could be number of posts divided by number of likes , multiplied by your chosen definition number with a colour code system . Or the other way about too . Well they do in a way. If you look at your profile, you will see on the right hand side the amount of "Likes" you have received. I, person who is most likely on the "he is a prat" list of most members (and Mods, if I am honest about these things), have a rating of 1014 Likes, classed as "Excellent" from 1612 posts. You have 150 Likes, also rated Excellent, but from 1435 posts. My arch nemesis (this month anyway) has a 308 Likes, rated at excellent as well (must be very low quality control on this rating word) from 1663 posts. No need for a lot of reprogramming by the mods - these numbers say it all perhaps. You have an arch nemesis?? On TV?? Surely you jest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudolus Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Why not provide a simple rating system , while the discussion rages on ? It could be number of posts divided by number of likes , multiplied by your chosen definition number with a colour code system . Or the other way about too . Well they do in a way. If you look at your profile, you will see on the right hand side the amount of "Likes" you have received. I, person who is most likely on the "he is a prat" list of most members (and Mods, if I am honest about these things), have a rating of 1014 Likes, classed as "Excellent" from 1612 posts. You have 150 Likes, also rated Excellent, but from 1435 posts. My arch nemesis (this month anyway) has a 308 Likes, rated at excellent as well (must be very low quality control on this rating word) from 1663 posts. No need for a lot of reprogramming by the mods - these numbers say it all perhaps. You have an arch nemesis?? On TV?? Surely you jest. OK you got me - not just one. You're just jealous though with your 50% LIKES to post ratio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Why not provide a simple rating system , while the discussion rages on ? It could be number of posts divided by number of likes , multiplied by your chosen definition number with a colour code system . Or the other way about too . Well they do in a way. If you look at your profile, you will see on the right hand side the amount of "Likes" you have received. I, person who is most likely on the "he is a prat" list of most members (and Mods, if I am honest about these things), have a rating of 1014 Likes, classed as "Excellent" from 1612 posts. You have 150 Likes, also rated Excellent, but from 1435 posts. My arch nemesis (this month anyway) has a 308 Likes, rated at excellent as well (must be very low quality control on this rating word) from 1663 posts. No need for a lot of reprogramming by the mods - these numbers say it all perhaps. You have an arch nemesis?? On TV?? Surely you jest. OK you got me - not just one. You're just jealous though with your 50% LIKES to post ratio. BUT, your likes ''could'' relate to the weirdo member factor eh. .................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now