USA is super indebted and going down the tubes so their best bet is to hobble the competition (China, Russia etc., the EU (already done) etc.) Calls out Tanatan as being the preferred US proxy leader for Thailand 00:07:08 Youtube Timestamps: 00:00:01 As the United States continues to play act diplomacy with Iran while waging actual war against Iran in West Asia and as the United States continues to wage war against Russia through Ukraine and to an increasing degree through the rest of Europe. United States continues pursuing confrontation with China. And as a matter of fact, all of these wars the US is waging elsewhere around the globe are all ultimately aimed at at shaping, global geopolitics to facilitate its containment, its encirclement and containment of China. 00:00:40 China is the number one target of US primacy. It is the number one obstruction of US primacy and the US is doing this in a number of ways. It is militarily encircling China by placing tens of thousands of troops in places like South Korea, Japan and a widening military footprint in the Philippines. As a matter of fact, I've been talking a lot about the Philippines lately. They are transforming the Philippines into the Ukraine of Southeast Asia. They are building it up militarily. They are neglecting the the 00:01:16 systemic poverty that the Philippines suffers from. They're completely ignoring that. They're redirecting national resources towards military spending. And they are encouraging the Philippines to provoke conflict with China in the South China Sea over maritime disputes that the Philippines has, not just with China, but with all of its other neighbors in the region. But the United States is encouraging the Philippines in creating a an actual conflict with China and China alone specifically to use them as 00:01:51 a proxy as a battering ram against China. And again, this will come at the total expense of the people of the Philippines themselves. The United States is also placing military forces within Chinese boundaries. The island province of Taiwan officially recognized by the US State Department itself as part of China. There are US troops on Taiwan right now. I've talked about how the United States is also attempting to infiltrate and politically capture nations all along China's periphery. In the very same way 00:02:24 the the United States has done this to both Russia and Iran. Uh Ukraine is a perfect example of a nation bordering Russia. the United States infiltrated, overthrew the government of politically captured it, and installed a client regime uh in in power in Ukraine right on Russia's border. Well, the United States is trying to do this all along China's borders as well. Uh the the the island province of Taiwan is actually Chinese territory the US has politically captured and is using against the rest of China. 00:03:00 I have been in Southeast Asia almost my entire adult life. I live in the Kingdom of Thailand and I got into geopolitics specifically to expose US interference here. They were trying to overthrow and politically capture Thailand and use it as a battering ram against China. Neighboring Myammar to the west, the US backs armed militants and terrorists fighting the central government there. They have been fighting the central government for decades now and what they are trying to do is politically capture 00:03:33 Myammar which is right on the border of China. There is belt and road initiative infrastructure running through Myamar. These USbacked terrorists have attacked that infrastructure repeatedly. I'm going to get into that a little bit uh in more detail. I've talked about the same process taking place in Pakistan which also borders China which also hosts belt and road initiative infrastructure running through it and the the purpose of the belt and road initiative infrastructure is to allow China to move goods out of China to the 00:04:07 rest of the world and energy from the rest of the world to China through Pakistan through Myammar to help China avoid US blockades at contested waterways like the Malaa Strait here in Southeast Asia. And I've showed this map many times before and it's very important that you see this. This is the straight of Malaa. So you have Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure, a pipeline essentially running through Myamar to China. You have another pipeline running through Pakistan to China. And the US has armed terrorists 00:04:42 attacking this infrastructure in both Pakistan and Myanmar. Here's Southeast Asia, Thailand, Lao, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines. These are all countries the US has either attempted to politically capture or have politically captured in the case of the Philippines, completely politically captured and is turning it into the Ukraine of Southeast Asia. and even conflicts as far away as Venezuela, the war on Iran itself, all of this is aimed at cutting energy off to China. So you can see how all of what 00:05:19 the US is doing worldwide, how that all connects to encircling and containing and isolating and hopefully from America's point of view collapsing China. Even the war on Russia is an attempt to destabilize and degrade Russia's ability to help China, to work together with China. A lot of China's energy is coming from Russia. And so, you can see how it's all connected. Now, what I want to do today is talk about something the United States is preparing the grounds for very carefully, quietly 00:05:56 in the media. They're setting the narrative up. Uh I actually wrote this article for New Eastern Outlook last month and I was going to get around to doing a video on it. And then just this morning I noticed this article from the New York Times just two days ago. The world has failed the weaguers. And this is by Tahir Imman. And if you just do a Google search for Tahir Imman, you get Democracy Digest from the National Endowment for Democracy, he's involved here. You have this from the Weaguer Times. They have a US 00:06:33 governmentf funded panel. He moderated the panel. Uh this she this was a panel that featured Ran Abbis, director of the campaign for Weaguers. This is funded by the US government through the National Endowment for Democracy. He was interviewed here by Human Rights Foundation. This was just earlier this year. And what is the Human Rights Foundation? If you go to their annual report, it it's literally the National Endowment for Democracy, but with the US government money thoroughly laundered through billionaire uh owned 00:07:08 foundations. They they know that people are catching on to it and so they're doing a better job of laundering the money so that you cannot trace it back to the US government. But but it's literally targeting everything the National Endowment for Democracy targets. Uh it's North Korea, China, Venezuela, Cuba, Russia, and of course uh Thailand. This I I I see him. Tanaton Jang Ruangette. He is this billionaire or I should say the son of billionaires and he is the political proxy of choice 00:07:46 of the United States here in the Kingdom of Thailand where I am based. And of course he was included here in this Weaguer Human Rights Project article right here. They talk all about him here. And what is the Weaguer Human Rights Project? Well, it's also funded by the National Endowment for Democracy and it's mentioned by name right here on the Ned's own official website. And then of course, Voice of America is literally US government funded media. It's media platform funded by the US government. 00:08:18 And this is an article all about him. He's right there, right there in the middle of the picture. So, so this is a New York Times op-ed by him. This man thoroughly connected to the US government. Weaguer Industrial Complex in Washington DC. I mean he's he's he has his own foundations uh that he has created all based in Washington DC. So I think you're getting the picture. And what are they talking about? They're talking about how the world has failed the weaguers. How China's carrying out genocide against 00:08:50 the Weaguers. The United States accused them of genocide against the Weaggguers. They put all kinds of financial pressure on them but China ignored it. and the rest of the world ignored it because the rest of the world saw what I saw and what I've been reporting on for years. I have many, many videos. If you go to my channel, and this works for any topic of interest you might have here, you have home video, live podcast, playlist, posts. Right here under search, you just type in Weaguers and you'll get a whole bunch of videos 00:09:22 spanning many years where I've completely exposed this so-called weaguer genocide the US government has been fabricating and accusing China of for many many years. And they're they're dusting it off to give it another go right now. That is the purpose of this New York Times oped is to start getting the information out there. This was just two days ago and I wrote my article for New Eastern Outlook here. US prepares terrorist army to expand its dirty war on China. I wrote this because I saw this article from NPR 00:10:02 which is actually also US government funded media and the title of this article is the foreign fighters who helped topple Assad and why China worries about them. So the US government built an army of terrorists to overthrow the government of Syria. We know this. The US government has admitted it. I'm going to get into the details of exactly how they did that and where they have admitted all of this. And it wasn't just fighters from Syria. They imported huge numbers, thousands and thousands of 00:10:35 foreign fighters to fight alongside them. It was a it was essentially a USbacked invasion of Syria with all of these foreign extremists that the US created, radicalized, armrained, and sent into Syria. And there was a pipeline where they were bringing extremists that they radicalized in western China through Southeast Asia, including uh a pipeline that ran through Thailand and that was shut off by the Thai government leading to a terrorist attack in Bangkok. That's this this is how the US punished Thailand for doing 00:11:08 that. A bombing in the center of Thailand, killing uh 20 completely innocent people at a shrine in downtown Bangkok. and they were piping them from China, western China through Southeast Asia to Turkey where they were armed and trained and sent to Syria. And that's what this that's what this NPR article is about. All of these weaguers who came from China, piped into Syria, fighting this war, helping the US overthrow the Syrian government. This this culminated in the toppling of the Syrian government 00:11:42 in late 2024 and by the way led directly to the subsequent US war of aggression against Iran. Once Syria collapsed, there was an air corridor cleared that the US and its Israeli proxies could use to attack Iran and they immediately began doing that as soon as it was created. So, I'm going to read this article. I'm going to add additional information when and if necessary. And I'm going to explain to you and I've warned about this for years that this was coming. And this is what articles like this are signs of that 00:12:15 they are preparing to do this. They are putting this information out there. They are shaping the perception of the public to be prepared for this. So when the attacks happen, people say, "Oh yeah, I think I remember reading about that in NPR or that in the New York Times. Oh, these poor weaggguers. Everyone forgot about them. They had no choice but to take up arms and go fight the Chinese wherever they could find them. If not in China, then all across Eurasia, wherever there were Chinese investments, 00:12:43 infrastructure projects, diplomatic missions, etc., they were left with no choice. This is the narrative that they are creating. And this is another weapon the United States continues to prepare against China. So for people out there who think the US is in retreat or that it wants to strike a grand bargain with China, no. The United States is continuously preparing to increase, expand its confrontation with China, not reduce it, not rectify it. And it is a confrontation the US and the US alone has created with China. China does not 00:13:17 want a confrontation with the United States. Now, let's begin. US media has invested in recent years in rehabilitating weaguer Chinese extremists now based in Syria, depicting them as freedom fighters. And that's what the point of all of this this propaganda campaign is all about. They are literal terrorists. They were sawing people's heads off in Syria because they weren't the the fake politically motivated brand of radicalization that they've been indoctrinated with. That is 00:13:48 what they were doing. So that is literal terrorism, the worst kind of terrorism whose ultimate goal is to liberate. And by liberate they mean carve off territory in western China. This is the Shing Jang region of China. And are preparing to fight China across Eurasia, adding to an already ongoing dirty war the US has been waging against China over the 20th and 21st centuries. US has been waging a war against China. A dirty war against China across Eurasia since the end of World War II. From the Cold 00:14:22 War to present day, the United States has actively created and used the world's worst terrorist organizations to advance US geopolitical objectives worldwide. I see all of these people talking about how Islam is this huge danger. Look at all this list of terrorist attacks. If you look at these terrorist attacks that they're listing, they are by terrorist organizations the US deliberately created and supports arms backs and utilizes worldwide from then until now. like al-Qaeda, for example. This includes the 00:14:54 creation and use of al-Qaeda through local chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1970s and 1980s in Syria and then their export to Afghanistan to fight the Soviet Union until their withdrawal in 1989. So, a lot of people might not realize this, but the Muslim Brotherhood, the same organization that Hamas is a branch of, produced al-Qaeda and all of these extremist groups that the US is using worldwide in all of these proxy wars, including the proxy war against Syria from 2011 to 2024, which of course Hamas supported, 00:15:32 supported the US backed war of aggression uh and proxy war of aggression against Syria. They even joined in on it. People forget that also. And that's Hamas. That's not the legitimate resistance organizations in Palestine. And it's not legitimate resistance organizations in the region like Ansarah or Hezbollah, which are completely different. And to lump them all together is only doing the the propaganda work of the United States government itself. That is another topic for another time. 00:16:03 It also includes the use of these same terrorists to divide and disrupt unified resistance to invading US forces in Iraq from 2003 onward and the eventual regionwide US reordering of the Arab world spanning Libya and Egypt and North Africa to Yemen and Syria in the Middle East, West Asia, beginning under the likewise US engineered Arab Spring in 2011. Now, we know the Arab Spring was or engineered by the United States because if you were paying attention at the time, which I was since it began, I looked at the 00:16:39 organizations that were involved leading the protests and they were all of these National Endowment for Democracy Open Society funded fronts. And then Wikileaks revealed a bunch of diplomatic cables admitting this. And then the New York Times eventually wrote a whole article about this. US groups helped nurture Arab uprising. A number of the groups and individuals directly involved in the revolts and reforms sweeping the region receive training and financing from groups like the International Republican Institute, the National 00:17:10 Democratic Institute and the Freedom House. All of these are subsidiaries of the National Endowment for Democracy and the New York Times even mentions National Democ National Endowment for Democracy by name. And then do you remember how everybody was saying, "Look how techsavvy these youth activists are all across the Arab world. Look at how they're using Facebook and Twitter." Except it wasn't because they were tech-savvy. It was because the US State Department gathered them together every 00:17:36 single year for many years before 2011, training them on how to use US-based social media platforms to help overthrow the respective governments. And then it even admits that here as well. some Egyptian youth leaders. And it wasn't some Egyptian youth leaders, it was US proxies gathered from around the globe, including proxies from Egypt that were being backed by the US government. They attended a 2008 technology meeting. Actually, these meetings were held annually, including in 2008 in New York, 00:18:08 where they were taught to use social networking and mobile technologies to promote democracy, which is a eupheanism for overthrowing their respective governments. Among those sponsoring the meeting were Facebook, Google, MTV, Columbia Law School, and the US State Department as essentially a State Department project that was working with all of these big tech giants then and they continued doing it now, including Elon Musk's X definitely being used in the exact same way Twitter was. And the rebranding was just a bait and switch. I 00:18:39 don't know if people have noticed that by now. So, that was the New York Times admitting what anyone paying attention closely at the time already knew. All of these groups leading the protests in the street were backed by the NAD, National Endowown for Democracy, the US government, and other adjacent foundations. And the protest served as cover for these extremist groups. The US also began preparing years in advance. I'll get to that here in just a minute. This was from all the way back in 2007 00:19:07 by Seymour Hirs. Okay? And he was warning that all the way back then during the Bush Jr. administration, the United States was working together with extremists, sympathetic to al-Qaeda to undermine Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Sound familiar? Sound like the sounds like the network of allies Iran created over decades to create strategic depth, defensive depth for Iran itself, knowing that it was targeted by the United States in the same way Iraq was, knowing that the US was ultimately coming after Iran. 00:19:53 And then it created a network of allies across the region to stretch [snorts] out its ability to resist and fight back against US aggression. From North Africa to Central Asia, the US has admittedly utilized terrorist organizations listed by the US State Department itself as such to both target nations the US military cannot attack directly and to serve as a pretext for US invasions and occupations and nations the US seeks to attack more directly. And they did this in in Libya. They used these ext these 00:20:24 very same extremists that they were talking about all the way back in 2007. Seymour Hersh was warning people all the way back in 2007 about they had these extremists. They used them as the ground troops in Libya while the US and all of its European proxies in NATO attacked from the air. And then they took a lot of these terrorists from Libya and literally moved them to Syria and join all the other terrorists they had in Syria trying to overthrow the government there. And then they had these extremists in 00:20:56 China that they were using to carry out deadly violence all across China, which is what this article is about. And they piped them into Syria as well. They were being stomped out in China by security measures China put in place to react to that violence. So they were getting them out of there so they wouldn't all be captured uh deprogrammed essentially reint either separated from society because they carried out violence or reintroduced into society with jobs and and an incentive to stay away from 00:21:30 trouble. They brought them over to Syria where they could be further radicalized, armed, trained, and then given years of battlefield experience. It was a very deliberate move. The US has done this over and over again all around the globe as it uses proxies like this. And so what did they do in Syria? They were using terrorists to try to overthrow the government. And when they were failing, the US said, "Hey, look at the terrorists in Syria. Look at ISIS in Syria. we need to go into Syria to stop 00:22:02 ISIS. But when they went into Syria, they didn't stop ISIS. They toppled the government. ISIS was fighting against the Syrian government, central central government of Syria. So that's what the US uses these terrorists for, as proxies to attack inside countries the US military cannot go, cannot afford to go to at the moment, or sending them into a country and then saying, "Ha, look, terrorists. We need to go in there and get those terrorists." Other episodes in which US strategy has been employed include 00:22:31 against both Russia and its southern caucus region. The two Chetchin wars was exactly this radicalizing groups of people and using them to fuel a war. A war inside Russia's borders and even as far as China and East Asia. So we're going to talk about these weaguers uh weaguer extremists which make up a tiny minority of the weaguer population in China. And you have to remember when the US was radicalizing these weaguer extremists, they were just as likely to kill other innocent Weaggguers as they 00:23:05 were HonChinese uh Chinese government workers, whatever their ethnic uh their ethnicity might have been. While both Russia and China appear to have successfully neutralized this malicious method of proxy warfare utilized by Washington within their respective borders, the US continues not only arming and building up terrorist forces for future conflicts, but is also shaping public perception to depict such use of US sponsored terrorism as somehow supporting freedom fighters against authoritarian governments. So let's talk 00:23:38 about how the US media is reintroducing weaguer terrorists as freedom fighters. So again, this NPR article is what I read and what prompted me to write this article. They are whitewashing outright cold-blooded terrorists. terrorists who are chopping people up into pieces in China for not subscribing to their madeup fake radicalized distorted vision of what they claim is Islam, chopping people up into little pieces in China for that. Then they went to Syria to fight in a war that was none of their 00:24:16 business, killing other human beings to help topple a government for the US government. And now they're going to be used against China all across Eurasia. That's where all of this is headed. This is what I'm warning you about. Now, a troubling sign that the US continues seeking to use extremists specifically tailored for attacking China and its investments and projects across Eurasia as a May 2026 National Public Radio and PR article titled the foreign fighters who helped topple Assad and why China 00:24:46 worries about them because they're literally terrorists and the US is is using them to topple governments friendly to China and then they're going to use them to target China itself again because they've already used them to target China once already. The article only the latest of many spanning recent years because they've been doing this since the end of 2024 when Syria was toppled. They said, "Well, Syria's been toppled politically captured by the United States. What are we going to do 00:25:14 with this highly effective army of terrorists that we built?" Well, we have to use them somewhere eventually. Why not use them against China and China's friends and allies and partners across Eurasia? So the article portrays the this largest the largest segment of foreign fighters involved in the USbacked overthrow of Syria in 2024. Weaguer extremists from China's western region of Shing Jang as simply fleeing persecution in China and incidentally ending up aligned with and fighting 00:25:43 alongside al-Qaeda. They just they act like they just for no reason the Chinese government just woke up one day and this these people have been living in China for centuries. uh and and China just woke up one day and decided to start persecuting them and eradicating them. That's that's the story. And so they had no choice but to flee. And somehow they ended up in Syria, which is a very strange place to end up in if you're just randomly fleeing China and then they're all just ending 00:26:15 up all of them are ending up in Syria. How odd. You know, if you really think about it, that's not possible. They were sent there deliberately. It was an organized effort to get them all into Syria. And then they just so happened to gravitate towards and end up as troops in the rank and file of al-Qaeda. All the different groups of al-Qaeda from ISIS to uh Jabhat al-Nusra which was then Hayat Tahir al-Ssham HTS. Okay. So the article mentions the previously US state department designated foreign 00:26:52 terrorist organization. This was until 2025. So this was President Donald Trump taking terrorists uh US State Department designated foreign terrorist organization off the terrorist list, revoking the foreign terrorist organization designation of Hayat Tahir al-Sham. some of the most grotesque, grizzly videos of these terrorists horribly, horribly violating all all international law, all conventions of war and doing the the most unthinkable things you can imagine to other human beings. They're 00:27:29 guilty of that. They're on video that they themselves shot doing these things and the US took them off the foreign terrorist organization list. Think about that. Think about why the US puts them on these lists. Uh to create distance between themselves and their proxies while they're committing these heinous crimes. And then when they take them off the list, it's to give them more support, more directly to go fight another adversary, in this case, China. So the article mentions the previously US State Department 00:28:00 designated foreign terrorist organization until June 2025. Hayat Tahir al-Ssham HTS. Weaguer fighters were recruited into as an al-Qaeda affiliate which ultimately overran Syrian forces in 2024 toppling the Syrian government. HTS's figurehead Abu Muhammad al- Jalani now referred to as Ahmed al-Shara a rebranding because throughout the duration of the war he was a notorious terrorist figure head and now the US has appointed him de facto president of Syria. So they need to rebrand him. has even been designated 00:28:37 as Syria's de facto president by you by the US and its proxies and has even been invited to the White House by current US President Donald Trump despite previously having a $10 million reward on his head by the US government itself. Here you go. Reward for justice reward offer for information on al-Nusra front because that's before they rebranded it to HTS. Muhammad al Jalani. Okay. So undoubtedly even the US said these were terrorists and Al Galani himself was a terrorist and then they 00:29:10 took the designation off because they were done overthrowing the Syrian government and they took the $10 million dollar bounty off his head because now it was time to make him president. So it's not about are they terrorists or not. They don't care. This is all about perception management. This is why I tell people please don't do analysis by official narrative or by comments made by a politician because they're they're only talk their mouth is only moving to to lie to you and to deceive you. 00:29:38 They're not going to actually tell you the truth about anything. They're not going to tell you what they're really thinking. They are telling you what they need you to believe is happening right now for now. The moral flexibility of the US regarding al-Qaeda based on whether the US is trying to justify direct military intervention in Syria before the government's collapse or cement a terroristled proxy regime afterwards is the central hallmark of decades spanning use by Washington of 00:30:06 terrorist organizations to target undermine topple then politically capture targeted nations. It is no coincidence that the US not only recruited thousands of weaguer extremists to fight alongside HTS in its proxy war against the Syrian government, but now seeks to redeploy this battleh hardened, experienced force of extremists across Eurasia as part of its ongoing dirty war against China. And I have recently written an article at well May 2026, Afghanistan, America's other ongoing proxy war. And actually I talk 00:30:38 about how the US is waging a dirty war against China worldwide and how Afghanistan is one of the emerging fronts of that dirty war where the US is backing ISIS in Afghanistan to prevent China from helping Afghanistan rebuild after the 20 years of war and occupation the US subjected Afghanistan to. And again, Afghanistan shares a border with China. Just so people understand, it's not a coincidence that the US is in all of these places that just so happen to border China or Iran or Russia. The NPR 00:31:13 article in regards to thousands of battleh hardened Weaguer extremists stated, this is a direct quote from the NPR article. They say they now hope to preserve their culture and perhaps one day raise an army powerful enough to seize control of Shing Jang or East Turkiststan as the Weaguers call it in the the region that Weaggguers consider their homeland and that the Chinese Communist Party took control of in 1949. But Shing Jang has been part of China for centuries. And when they say took control of in 00:31:47 1949, this is after European invaders came to China were trying to break China up into pieces. They were successful to a certain extent. And then after World War II, when China threw these European invaders out, they began reclaiming this territory that the West was carving off of China. And so what happened in 1949 was just taking back territory the West was carving off of it. Of course, Shing Jang has been part of China for centuries and only briefly during the 20th century found itself a drift as 00:32:23 part of a US European imposed century of humiliation China experienced before its rise in the last 20th and now 21st century history. Washington finds an inconvenience regarding narratives it is building ahead of justifying the next wave of terrorism being prepared across Eurasia and against China itself. Now let's go back to this NPR article quote where they say these weaguers in Syria these battleh hardened weaggguers in Syria they hope to raise an army powerful enough to seize control of 00:32:55 Shing Jang. How can you do that without state sponsorship? Of course there's no possible way to do that without state sponsorship. Where are they going to get that sponsor? Which state is going to offer them that sponsorship? The United States, of course, and its proxies. It's it's very obvious how this all works. Today, NPR pretends the circumstances surrounding violence in China's Shing Jang region involving radicalized Weaggguers is ambiguous, claiming it began with student protests demanding 00:33:22 the investigation into clashes between Weaguer and Han factory workers. The article only barely touches on the violent nature of weaguer extremism in Shing Jang which then radiated far beyond the region in subsequent years. So it started in Shing Jang but it spread across the rest of China and then it spread across the rest of Eurasia over time. And again that doesn't happen unless there's a state sponsor facilitating that. Ordinary people can't just create a a network of armed violence spanning multiple countries. 00:33:55 material reality. In reality, the Western media has admitted in past years to a concerted campaign of targeted radicalization of China's weaguer population in its western Shing Jang region. So, you're going to see you're going to see articles like this from Human Rights Foundation, keeping weaguer stories alive, questions and answers with exiled Weaguer journalist Tahir. Weaguer stories, weaguer culture, all of these things these US proxies are claiming China is eradicating have nothing to do with actual weaguer 00:34:36 culture or their version of Islam that they practiced for centuries in Shenzhan. This is a radicalization that took place over a very short period of time, initiated by the US through its proxies like Saudi Arabia where they actually erased weaguer culture overrode it with this politically driven radicalization that then tried to eradicate actual indigenous weaguer culture all across Shing Jang and transform it into this this uh mindless violence that the US hoped to destabilize China with. So, 00:35:18 let's go to this LA Times article right here. This was from 2016. In China, rise of Salafism fosters suspicion and division among Muslims. Just look at the title itself. Salafism is is just another way of saying the the brand of extremism that ISIS, al-Qaeda, and all of these other proxies the US uses subscribe to. is the the politically motivated brand of violent extremism. They tried to overwrite actual Islam with all around the world and they were doing it in Shing Jang. And the the headline 00:35:55 itself says it was not just creating division between Muslim weaguers and non-Muslim Chinese living in Shing Jang. They're saying it even created division among the Muslims of Shinjang. So what does that mean? That means it was radical, it was violent, it was extreme, and it clashed with indigenous weaguer culture and traditions and stories and all of the things these frauds living in Washington DC claim that they're trying to protect and preserve. The article describes the process as originating from Washington's 00:36:29 close Persian Gulf ally Saudi Arabia. So it had nothing to do with Shing Jang or Weaguer culture. It was from Saudi Arabia and it was entirely artificial and extremely deliberate and malicious. And this is what the LA Times reports. This is a quote from the article. Saudi preachers and organizations began traveling to China. Some of them bore gifts, training programs for clerics, Qurans for distribution. They already have Qurans in Shing Jang. So what were these Qurans that they were giving them? fake 00:37:01 Qurans with radicalization baked into it has nothing to do with the actual Quran. And in Christianity, you'll see many fake Bibles distributed for the very same purpose to indoctrinate people and drive them away from the the true roots of their religion, not not closer toward it. And funding for new Islamic institutes and mosques. So they were pouring money into Shing Jang to create a fake religion to overwrite the actual religion weaguer and traditions and culture that weaggguers were observing for centuries. 00:37:35 This exposure to Saudi discourses, so they weren't Weaguer discourses, they were Saudi discourses from thousands of miles away, actually caused a momentary implosion within the Salafi community in the 1980s, said Muhammad Al Sudari, a doctoral student in the University of Hong Kong, who spent years researching Salafi Muslims in China. The new generation, which was much more engaged and influenced by Saudi Arabia, began to contest the knowledge of older generations. They're talking about rejecting weaguer 00:38:07 culture and traditions and stories. You had a lot of excommunication within the Muslim community. People were saying to each other that they were not real Muslims. This is what empire has always done. You you go in, you see where the fault lines are, and if there are none, you create them, and then you exploit them. And then you make those fault lines as big as possible and the divisions as deep as possible to cause as much damage and to make it as difficult as possible for the country you're doing this to to reverse the 00:38:37 process. In other words, despite Washington accusing Beijing of genocide in Shing Jang, parenthetically meaning cultural genocide. Okay, so let me explain this. The US accuses China of genocide against the Weaggguers. If you investigate it, there there is no evidence at all. There's not even serious claims that China is actually wiping out and killing Weaggguers in Shing Jang. They're not even accusing China of that if you look deep enough. They're just hoping you don't and just 00:39:07 assume there is some sort of real genocide taking place. But if you look into the details, you will see them, you know, in parenthesis, well, it's it's not really genocide genocide. It's a cultural genocide. But then it turns out when you look even deeper and you read articles like this, the cultural genocide was actually being carried out by the United States through its Saudi proxies using fake Salafism to overwrite traditional weaguer religion, culture, history, etc. It was the US through its 00:39:36 Saudi proxies erasing indigenous weaguer culture and overriding it with an imported politically driven Salafist extremism that demonstrabably exploded into armed widespread violence targeting China's stability which is what I what I was just explaining and again they were not just killing non-wager non-Muslim Chinese they were killing other weaguers they were killing other Muslims also and this is what these extremists do that the US creates all around the world. Most of their victims are actually 00:40:08 Muslims. While this violence is deliberately omitted from Western narratives today regarding Shing Jang, this NPR article isn't going to go into any of that. They're not going to talk about the Weaguers when they were back in China, the fact that they were chopping up families at train stations in Kuming. They're not going to talk about that. But if you go back a couple of years, when it looked like China couldn't control this and it was running rampant and out of control, the West was 00:40:35 very happy to report on all of the violence and to really try to pump this up as a as a national crisis for China. So while the violence is deliberately omitted from Western narratives today regarding Shing Jang, specifically to amplify the illusion Beijing's subsequent security measures were arbitrary and unwarranted. At the height of the violence between 2009 and 2015, the Western media eagerly reported on spiraling violence Beijing seemed at the time unable to control. And there's this BBC article right here. 00:41:10 Why is why is there tension between China and the Weaguers? This is from 2014. And in this article, they talk all about the violence, how how extensive and widespread it was. And I'm going to read you a long quote from this article. So, this is the Western media admitting to this violence that they now never talk about. Things really escalated in 2009 with large-scale ethnic rioting in the regional c capital Umchi. Some 200 people were killed in the unrest, most of them Hanchinese according to 00:41:44 officials. Security was increased and many weaguers detained as suspects where they were carrying out widespread violence. Of course, people will be investigated and arrested. That's what happens when you carry out violence in in any society that has rule of law. But violence rumbled on as rights groups increasingly pointed to tight control by Beijing. Now, who are these right groups? These right groups are all the ones being funded by the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington DC who are encouraging separatism and 00:42:14 violence in Shing Jang, never mentioning it publicly and only talking about how China is reacting to that separatism and violence. In Jul in June 2012, six Weaggguers reportedly tried to hijack a plane from Hoten to Oramchi before they were overpowered by passengers and crew. There was bloodshed in April 2013. And in June that year, 27 people died in Shan County after police opened fire on what state media described as a mob armed with knives attacking local government buildings. The article then 00:42:50 so the BBC then it briefly attempts to suggest the details of the attacks were difficult to verify in an attempt to deny Beijing's justification for increased security to deal with this violence. However, most of the attacks described in the BBC article have been captured on security cameras documented the undeniable brutality of the radicalized violence. Now I have seen this footage. So all of these attacks the BBC is describing almost all of them were captured on security footage. I have seen it and it is horrific. So if 00:43:23 you go looking for it, just remember once you see it, you cannot unsee it. At least 31 people were killed and more than 90 suffered injuries in May 2014 when two cars crashed through an RMC market and explosives were tossed into the crowd. China called it and and the BBC puts it in quotation marks, violent terrorist incident. What do you call it when a car rams through a crowd killing people and is throwing bombs out the window? What do you call it other than terrorism? And the BBC putting it into 00:43:52 quotation marks tells you everything you need to know about how dishonest the West is trying to be about even undeniable terrorism. It followed a bomb and knife attack at South Railway Station in April which killed three and injured 79 others. When they talk about a knife attack, it isn't like in the movie where you just stab someone one time. They are chopping people to pieces and it was on camera. In July, authorities said attacks were carried out on government offices in Yarakan, leaving 96 dead. The imam of 00:44:25 China's largest mosque, Jum Tahhir, was stabbed to death days later. He was a he was a weaguer Muslim and he was killed by these terrorists who were trying to erase indigenous weaguer culture, religion, traditions, and stories. In September about 50 died in blasts in Lunai County outside police stations, a market and a shop. Details of both incidents are unclear and act activists activist these activists US government funded propagandists who live in Washington DC. They have contested some accounts of 00:45:03 incidents in state media. Okay, so always keep that in mind. Every time they say activists, they mean National Endowment for Democracy funded frauds who live in Washington DC. People I have proven for years and years are frauds. I've gone through all of their accusations. Some of them publish reports. I've gone through the reports extensively showing how dishonest these claims actually are, how utterly fabricated they are, and how even the claims themselves are inconsistent and contradict 00:45:33 their own claims over and over again to the point where they themselves are ruling out their own testimony because they'll say one thing one day and then regarding a specific incident and then something the next day that couldn't possibly be true. So one or the other has to be a lie, but mo most likely both are lies. And then it says some violence has also spilled out of Shing Jang. A March stabbing spree in Quuming in Yunan province that killed 29 people was blamed on Shing Jang separatists. Again, 00:46:05 that was caught on camera and it is horrific. It is just ordinary families being cut to pieces by these terrorists that the US deliberately radicalized through Saudi Arabia in the exact same way they created the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, and all the other terrorist organizations that branched off from there, including ISIS. And then they say there was a October 2013 incident where a car plowed into a crowd and burst into flames in Beijing's Tianan Square. That was the picture in the BBC article that 00:46:36 they show. So they even they're showing you footage of these things. They then try to question and debate did it really happen? Dwell you have a you literally have a photograph of one of the incidents that you are reporting on. So yes, it did happen. The extensive So that's the end of the BBC quote. The extensive but by no means exhaustive list the BBC published of violence carried out by radicalized Weaggguers left a path of death and destruction from Shin Shing Jang to Beijing with attacks just as likely to 00:47:09 kill fellow Weaggguers as they were other ethnic groups and government employees and and some of these government employees are are themselves weaggguers. The violence eventually radiated beyond China itself with a bomb blast in 2015 targeting central Bangkok. I I was in Bangkok when that happened. That is a place that I at at certain times would walk by every single day. Uh the capital of Thailand following the Thai government's refusal of US government demands that weaguer terrorist suspects be allowed to travel 00:47:42 onward to Turkey to join US backed terrorist forces fighting in neighboring Syria instead of being sent back to China to face justice. So there was this pipeline the US was running to get extremist violent radicalized weaguers out of China so China couldn't lock them up and deprogram them and either keep them separated for their own safety and the safety of of society or if they hadn't committed violence but they were radicalized dradicalize them give them job training and give them their lives 00:48:12 back. They did not want that happening. So they took this resource of extremists that they had created over the years and they were channeling them through Southeast Asia, sending them to Turkey and then into Syria. And Thailand detained a whole bunch of them. They caught them and detained them. And China said, "Please send these people back. They're suspects and they need to face justice back in China where they're from." And Thailand said, "Yes, we will send them back to you. We have a treaty 00:48:41 with you, an extradition treaty, and we will send them back." And the United States government told Thailand, "No, don't you dare send them back to China. Let them travel onward." Where were they going? They were going to Turkey. Why were they going to Turkey? Cuz they were getting prepared to be sent to Syria. And Thailand said, "No, we're sending them back to China. We are obligated by treaty. If they were Americans that you wanted back, we would have to send them back to America." Right? And so what is 00:49:05 Thailand's punishment for this? A terrorist bombing in the middle of Bangkok, killing 20 people. grotesque, grizzly terrorist attack. Again, not like a Hollywood bomb blast. I'm talking about body parts hanging from trees. This is what I'm talking about. When you see it and you experience it, it takes on a whole new meaning. But but again, it's something that once you see it, you cannot unsee it. Chinese security and development policy successfully managed to bring the cycle of radicalization and 00:49:33 violence to an end, rehabilitating and deprogramming extremists before providing them job training and allowing them to return to society. And that that assumes that they were radicalized, but they hadn't yet carried out serious violence because obviously they would still be in jail as they would in any other country. China also invested heavily in economic development across Shing Jang to drain the pools of poverty and unemployment that had primed the local population for radicalization in 00:50:00 the first place. China is a huge country. China has been pushing hard to develop and eradicate poverty from all across China, not just Shing Jang. And then as these efforts began succeeding, people in Shing Jang, they were enjoying better lives, better stability, better prospects, and the ability for the US to prey on people was minimized. However, this did not happen before thousands of Weaguer extremists were transplanted by the US from Western China to West Asia where they were armed, trained, and 00:50:37 battleh hardened in the US backed overthrow of Syria spanning 2011 to 2024, where they now await redeployment against both China itself and Chinesebacked investments, infrastructure projects, and diplomatic missions across Asia. So now you can see the whole cycle. They radicaliz the US radicalized them, attempted to destabilize and destroy China. When that failed, they transplanted them from China to West Asia to fight US proxy wars there. They're now heavily armed, battleh hardened. They can now redeploy 00:51:10 them anywhere in Eurasia that they want. And now they have this story that they're trying to push where they've been persecuted by China and they want they want freedom and that's why they're going to go carry out terrorism all across Eurasia. But now you know the rest of the story. So when you see these headlines pop up in the months and years to come, you will see straight through it hopefully. That's why I do this. >> [snorts] >> Now let's talk about resurrecting and 00:51:39 rebranding Washington's anti-China terror front. So again these are terrorist organization. The US listed them as terrorist organizations and then they delisted them. Why? Why did they do that? So just as the US has done with other terrorist organizations including HTS in Syria and the notorious Muhadin al Khalik MK of Iran. I've talked about this many many times. The 2009 Brookings Institution paper which path to Bersia talked about using terrorists to destabilize Iran and they talked about 00:52:12 MEK specifically and they said in 2009 when they wrote this paper they said MEK is a listed terrorist organization. If you want to give them broader support you need to dellist them first. And then that's exactly what the US did. They dlisted them to give them broader support. That's what they did for HTS. That is what they're going to do for the Weaguer terrorist organizations. Weaguer terrorist organizations like the East Turkiststan Islamic Movement. East Turkystan is the fake madeup country 00:52:41 that these USbacked terrorists want to carve out of China and create. So East Turkystan Islamic Movement ETIM previously listed by the US State Department as a foreign terrorist organization has been delisted as of 2020. And under which presidential administration was that? That was President Donald Trump's first administration. That's Mike Pompeo right there. US removes China condemned group from terror list. And then down here it says ETIM was removed from the list because for more than a decade there has 00:53:13 been no credible evidence that ETIM continues to exist. The State Department spokesperson said. So this was 2020, right? And they're saying for a decade. So that means from 2010 onward there's no evidence at all that ETM ETIM exists except just 2 years earlier US Central Command was bombing ETIM terrorists in Afghanistan. You're saying well if they're US backed why are they bombing them? When you when you create a terrorist organization with tens of thousands of terrorists, thousands or 00:53:49 tens of thousands of terrorists, you have the people you are using to train and arm and direct them at the top. But as you go deeper and deeper into the rank and file, you are going to have true believers. These are people wholly are committed to their cause. They honestly believe in it. They have no idea what it is they're part of. It's kind of like me joining the US military. I had no idea what I was actually really joining and and really why I thought I knew why, but the real reason why I had 00:54:16 no clue. And that's what happens with these people. And you could have entire groups of rank and file that are on their own doing their own thing separate from what the US actually has them out there doing. And so every once in a while, it's like a a shrub that you're shaping landscaping. You got to you got to take a little bit off. So this is why they were bombing them in Afghanistan in 2018. So that's just two years before they were dislisted before they were delisted and they were delisted because 00:54:48 there was no evidence of them existing for more than a decade. So you would have to believe that the State Department had no idea that Central US Central Command was bombing them in Afghanistan just two years earlier. They're obviously lying. They know they still exist. That's why they're delisting them because they want to give them broader support. They want to rebrand them and that's why NPR US government funded media is writing articles like this to rebrand them. So I mentioned that in the article ETIM was 00:55:16 removed from the list because for more than a decade there had been no credible evidence that ETIM continues to exist as per the state department in that 2020 article. Yet just two years earlier, well within the more than a decade, US Central Command itself admitted to strikes on ETIM terrorists in Afghanistan, which shares a short section of border with neighboring China, exposing the US State Department's justification for delisting ETIM as a blatant lie. Just as was the case with HTS and MEK, the Syrian 00:55:48 terrorist organization, the Iranian terrorist organization, the Chinese weaguer terrorist organization, ETIM, was delisted not because it no longer exists or is no longer engaged in terrorism, but because the US seeks to legitimize that terrorism and more openly aid and abet it. The US is already waging a dirty war against China across Eurasia, including backing Beluch terrorists in southwest Pakistan and arming militants in Southeast Asia's Myamar. Both of whom are striking at Chinesebacked infrastructure projects, 00:56:24 attacking Chinese investments and in Pakistan, killing Chinese engineers along with an attempt to kill the Chinese ambassador to Pakistan himself. So we have a couple of articles regarding that. This was from 2011 free Baluchaan and they just openly talk about how Pakistan has given China a base at Guadrar. This was uh one of the main terminals for the belt and road initiative infrastructure running through Pakistan in the heart of Baluch territory. So an independent Beluchaan would serve US strategic interests. 00:56:58 Essentially, China's building belt and road initiative infrastructure across Pakistan. If we were to carve off Pakistan's southwest Buchasan region with separatists, terrorists, it would completely cut the Barri in half and they wouldn't be able to proceed. Then there's this from France 24. This was 2021. Deadly car bombing in Pakistan targets hotel hosting Chinese ambassadors. So the these US backed terrorists that they were openly talking about aiding and abetting to carve off 00:57:29 Baluchaan from the rest of Pakistan to specifically to hurt China. They attempted to kill the Chinese ambassador to Pakistan. And I've gone over the articles uh the Arowati funded by the National Endowment for Democracy US government funded media regarding Myamar Myamar Houtha abandons Chinese pipeline amid resistance tax. This was just last year and there's articles like this almost every year. These USbacked terrorists are attacking Chinese infrastructure and investments all across Myammar. Myar is literally on the 00:58:00 border of China. I'll show you on the map right here that that's Myammar and the the Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure runs through Myamar straight into Yunan province, China. older articles like this one from 2022 also from US government funded Irati China backed pipeline facility damaged in Myammar resistance attack. So they've they've cut it off, they've attacked it, they've damaged it on multiple occasions. They even have a a map here showing you this is the the 00:58:30 infrastructure going through Myammar. Uh also referred to by its British colonial nomenclature, Burma. It runs through Myammar into southern China. And so they're attacking it. And they also talk about anti-Chinese sent sentiment swelled in Myammar following the military coup which many people believed Beijing had a hand in. At the time there were calls for boycott of Chinese products along with calls to blow up the pipelines if China refused to condemn the regime. But of course we know that's not their policy. That's the 00:59:06 US State Department's policy. This is a 2018 Naval War College review paper, a maritime oil blockade against China. They talk about blockading these waterways, the US Navy blockading these waterways. They also talk about land routes that China has already created to circumvent those blockades China knows the US will eventually impose on them. You have pipelines from Russia going into China, the power Siberia pipeline, you have the pipeline in Myammar. They even they even show it here. My China 00:59:39 oil pipeline and they say a distant blockade would also need to interdict the Myamar China oil pipeline. The area could be declared an exclusion zone for the duration of any conflict. And if the Myamar authorities failed to comply, the facility could be disabled via air strikes, aerial mining, or other kinetic action. Well, other kinetic action could just be having your terrorists in Myammar that you've been arming it back in for decades attacking it and destroying it or pushing Myammar government forces away from it and 01:00:10 essentially trying to cut it altogether. So, let me let me finish this article. We're almost to the end here. Weaguer extremists transplanted by the US to topple Syria and West Asia are now openly being prepared by Washington to work their way back east towards China to augment this already ongoing dirty war that I just talked about. So you see what the US is already doing to kill Chinese citizens, attempt to kill their ambassadors, attack their infrastructure and investments. And now they're 01:00:37 preparing this army of weaguer terrorists that they have in Syria. They're preparing to deploy them to en enhance to augment this ongoing dirty war they're already waging against China. So they're working their way back east towards China to augment this already ongoing dirty war the US is waging against China. Its belt and road initiative investments citizens and diplomatic missions as well as China's friends and partners everywhere in between. Thailand attacked by these terrorists backed by the US because they 01:01:09 sided with China regarding Chinese citizens that China asked to be sent back to their country to face justice. Part of these preparations include the US media itself reinventing previously US designated terrorists into freedom fighters in the hopes of not only building public and political support for Washington's armed proxies, but to depict China's inevitable attempts to defend itself against this latest hostility aimed at it as authoritarianism and even aggression. So when these terrorists start attacking 01:01:42 China and China starts reacting to it, Dios will say, "Ha, look at China killing these freedom fighters. Look, they're working with Myammar's military to to help crack down on these freedom fighters." When in reality, it's China trying to defend itself from a yet another element of America's dirty war, proxy war on China. Only time will tell if China's rise and attempts to build up the multipolar world can outpace Washington's attempts to undermine China and tear the 01:02:16 multipolar world down. In the meantime, Washington has readied yet another piece to place upon this global chessboard, one that threatens nations across Eurasia and demands Eurasiawide security cooperation with China to defend against. Almost every country in the region has been affected by this in one way or another. And in regards to weaguer terrorism in particular, countries like Thailand have been affected by this by this US foreign policy and its its anti-China agenda. And so countries across the region, across Eurasia need 01:02:49 to get serious about coordinating security across all of the domains the US is waging war. Not just traditional military domains, not just terrorism or or proxy war. I'm also talking about information space, political space, entertainment, culture, everything. Everything that the US uses to shape public perception in the minds of people to prepare the way for for physical violence, coercion, capture, and exploitation. And it's not just China's government and the governments of everyone in the 01:03:30 region. It's up to all of us as well. I go through all of this and research this and try to warn people as early as possible that this is happening. The more people talk about this in the way that it exists in reality that this is a US proxy war against China when they start carrying out attacks, people will get ahead of it much much quicker. They will say, "Aha, I I I remember people talking about this that the US was going to use weaguer extremists to do this and now they're doing it." And that helps undermine the 01:04:02 US's ability to to wield this weapon. If everyone sees through it, they see that it's just US sponsored terrorism, the whole narrative will fall apart. They'll continue doing it, but it'll allow all of the countries being targeted by it to react quickly and fully without having to worry about people misinterpreting it because of Western propaganda, because of the West control over information space as some sort of authoritarian crackdown. Okay. So, this is why it's important to 01:04:33 talk about these things. I know people want to to hear about the war the US is still waging against Iran. the US war still being waged against Russia in Ukraine. I will get to all of that, but I think that's very important to continue covering these sort of topics, especially as early as possible. It could be another year or two before the US really puts this into motion or it could happen later this year. Who knows? But at least you know about it now. When it does happen, you'll know exactly what 01:05:03 the US is up to. If you thought this video was useful, please like and share. think about subscribing. It's free to do. It helps the channel grow. If you go to any one of my videos, this is where you can like and share. There should be some something around here for you to subscribe. Because it's my channel, I can't subscribe to my own channel. There are also video descriptions right here. You'll see one or two lines of text and it'll say more. You click on it and it'll have a short description of the 01:05:32 video as well as all the resources I cited. I I spent a lot of time putting these together. I want people to see these resources. I want them to be able to look at it and see it for themselves. There are also lists of everywhere else you can find and follow my work. I have a website. I'm on Telegram, X, Rumble, and of course, YouTube. There are also ways you can help support my work. I do not monetize any of my social media platforms. So, if ads pop up, feel free to skip or block them. They're not 01:06:01 helping me out at all. I specifically don't monetize my work because I don't want my audience bombarded by ads. That's at least one of several reasons. So, if ads pop up, skip them, block them, whatever you have to do. If you do want to help support my work, you can do that through buy me a coffee and also Patreon. And again, the links are here in the video description of every single video. And to everyone who has been helping out, whether it's a one-time donation, donations monthtomonth, or if 01:06:32 you have no resources to spare at all, just helping like and share and subscribe, posting a kind comment, sending a news tip, all of this is greatly appreciated. I get I get messages from people uh encouraging me uh telling me, you know, don't worry about people uh discouraging your work. All of that, all combined helps make this work possible, helps me to continue doing this work. And so I sincerely thank all of that help in whatever form it takes. And as always, thank you for watching.
