webfact Posted October 24, 2012 Share Posted October 24, 2012 POLITICS Jatuporn links 'men in black' to Army The Nation BANGKOK: -- Red shirt co-leader and Pheu Thai MP Jatuporn Promphan submitted to further questioning by the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) yesterday in relation to the crackdown on red-shirt protesters in April and May 2010, which left 92 people dead. Jatuporn brought with him copies of related court verdicts and legal documents from a civil court case filed against the Army seeking monetary compensation for designating a "live-fire zone" during the crackdown. On the issue of the so-called "men in black" seen firing weapons during the unrest, Jatuporn insisted that photographs released by the now-defunct Centre for the Resolution of the Emergency Situation (CRES) contain irregularities, and were released three days after the incident. Jatuporn claimed the photos were part of a psychological warfare campaign mounted by the then-ruling Abhisit Vejjajiva administration. "In the case of the men in black, it was imagined and plotted beforehand. Then there was the operation at Kok Wua Intersection. If the issue is real, there should be no cover-ups, and CCTV footage should be released. The CRES spent more than Bt6 billion; why don't they have CCTV video?" Jatuporn asked. He added that he believes photographs exist of men in black and Army personnel hiding in and shooting from the same area and direction. As for rumours that Army chief General Prayuth Chan-ocha planned to stage a military coup against the government, Jatuporn said he believed this Army chief would never carry out such an act. Even if there was to be a coup, the military would not be able to control things and the people would not accept it, Jatuporn added. In a related development, Gen Prayuth discounted Jatuporn's words regarding the alleged link between the men in black and the Army, adding that it was for the public to decide if it wanted to believe Jatuporn. Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real. Pheu Thai party-list MP Weng Tojirakarn, meanwhile, held a press conference as a member of the House Committee on Law, Justice and Human Rights announcing that he had submitted a letter to committee chairman Pol General Virut Fuensaen asking him to release the panel's report on the 2010 incident. Making the report public would reduce the risk of a recurrence of such deadly violence, Weng said. -- The Nation 2012-10-25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiSoLowSoNoSo Posted October 24, 2012 Share Posted October 24, 2012 [/img] blablabla blablabla blabla blabla, who cares what this monkey says. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buchholz Posted October 24, 2012 Share Posted October 24, 2012 [/img] blablabla blablabla blabla blabla, who cares what this monkey says. Is that the "Missing Link" of the link that is missing in the thread title? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asiawatcher Posted October 24, 2012 Share Posted October 24, 2012 This guy hasn't got any ethics, morals or credibility. Every time he opens his mouth more verbal diarrhea spews forth. And let not the truth stand in the way of this motor mouth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonclark Posted October 24, 2012 Share Posted October 24, 2012 "The CRES spent more than Bt6 billion; why don't they have CCTV video?" Jatuporn asked." I'll answer jatuporns question, with one of my own. Evolution spent 6 million years creating humans, so why do you have a brain? jonclark asked. Simple answer as this Muppet knows is that the UDD thugs and activists purposely tore down the CCTV cameras to hid their activities. As to why he has no brain...well, every village needs a fool. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GentlemanJim Posted October 24, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted October 24, 2012 Will the media please stop giving this oxygen thief 'air time'! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noistar Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Will the media please stop giving this oxygen thief 'air time'! Along with the cowardly Criminal in Dubai. I think thailand has no hope. lets change history - well the reconciliation bill should help - then put all the blame for 2010 on the shoulders of Abhisit and the army. Corr - that was easy - Reds good, everybody else bad. time for another election and a landslide victory, just to make sure it doesn't get changed by rule of law or anything irrelevant like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzMick Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Jatuporn declared B4 million assets from working as a "political activist." I would really like to see his tax returns (if any) to see the source of that income. BTW on the subject of poor sartorial choice, you gotta love that tie. Edited October 25, 2012 by OzMick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siampolee Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 "The CRES spent more than Bt6 billion; why don't they have CCTV video?" Jatuporn asked." Jutuporn In case of a memory lapse it was the Red Shirts who destroyed the C.C.T.V. system in their sponsored riots. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saltandpepper Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Jatuporn, please go to see a doctor. I am deeply convinced that beside being a buffoon, you are seriously sick. Don't wait until it is to late! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post otherstuff1957 Posted October 25, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted October 25, 2012 When it comes to politics, people tend to have remarkably short memories. Despite that fact, the Redshirt leaders still had to wait two years before coming out with this claim. Otherwise, people would recall that the blackshirts were being referred to as "Ronin Warriors who are here to protect the Redshirt protesters" by the very same people who are now claiming that they were army provocateurs! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilDrSomkid Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Funny how Korkeaw says the black shirt were organized by the Democrats, and Jatuporn says they were Army people. So which one is it? Their so-called "evidence" is so thin it is laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MunterHunter Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Hes got the kind of face that not even his mother could love... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saltandpepper Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 When it comes to politics, people tend to have remarkably short memories. Despite that fact, the Redshirt leaders still had to wait two years before coming out with this claim. Otherwise, people would recall that the blackshirts were being referred to as "Ronin Warriors who are here to protect the Redshirt protesters" by the very same people who are now claiming that they were army provocateurs! This is quite a common feature for terrorists to try rewrite history when they are in power. After this democratic (not so) election victory, they feel they can do everything. I am sure that sometimes, they will pay dearly for misleading their people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Jatuporn's new bestest-friend is General Prayuth ? Hub of U-turns, anyone ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferangled Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buchholz Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Jatuporn declared B4 million assets from working as a "political activist." I would really like to see his tax returns (if any) to see the source of that income. Jatuporn made millions in the stock market with shares of Red Shirt Television . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickymaster Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) Color-coded-kids That's what those red-shirts are. "Don't leave home without red because a red shirt is something you are 24/7!" GROW UP KIDS! Edited October 25, 2012 by Nickymaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickymaster Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 (edited) In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." Prayuth meant that the MIB could have been the red-shirts? Somebody must have committed below crimes don't you think so? 1) the firing of an M79 into the 11th Infantry Regiment on January 28, 2010; 2) the firing of grenades during the incidents at Kok Wua intersection on April 10, 2010, which caused 5 deaths of soldiers (including that of Col Romklao); 3) the firing into the oil depot at Prathum Thani on April 21, 2010; 4) the firing of an M79 into the BTS station at Sala-Daeng on April 22, 2010, which caused 2 deaths and 78 injuries; 5) the firing of an RPGs into Dusit-Thani Hotel on May 17, 2010 6) the firing attack into the police flat at Lumpini Police Station on May 19, 2010, causing deaths and injuries of police officers and their families; 7) the firing of an M16 on police officers and soldiers in front of the Krung Thai Bank, Sala-Daeng Branch, on May 7, 2010, which caused 1 death and 2 injuries of policemen; 8) the firing into the UCL building on May 14, 2010, causing 1 deaths and 4 injuries of police officers. Edited October 25, 2012 by Nickymaster 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Does he actually have any proof for anything he has suggested? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrain Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Does he actually have any proof for anything he has suggested? Why he need proof?It's enough that his uneducated followers, who never question anything because their only concern is the 500 Baht they get at the ballot, see him making some unfounded comments on televion to strenghten their believe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buchholz Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Does he actually have any proof for anything he has suggested? His belief system is irrefutable proof. OP: He added that he believes photographs exist of men in black and Army personnel hiding in and shooting from the same area and direction. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaddeus Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Does he actually have any proof for anything he has suggested? His belief system is irrefutable proof. OP: He added that he believes photographs exist of men in black and Army personnel hiding in and shooting from the same area and direction. . Could be a not so subtle hint to a Red padlomite with some PhotoShop skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzMick Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... I was reporting on a BP article. Why would I quote somebody else in thread titled "Jatuporn links MIB to Army"; to change the subject? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbamboo Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 Credit Yingluck for once. Even she finds Jatuporn an embarrassment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... He didn't say he didn't believe they existed. He said he didn't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferangled Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." Prayuth meant that the MIB could have been the red-shirts? Is that a question Nicky?! ""Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." I am quoting the OP but it seems you are quoting your imagination... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzMick Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... He didn't say he didn't believe they existed. He said he didn't know. Believing and knowing is the same thing in red-spin land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferangled Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... He didn't say he didn't believe they existed. He said he didn't know. Err... quite, nothing like splitting hairs is there?! Is your point that he was acting out of blind belief much like a religious zealot, with no actual knowledge that the enemy even existed, just blind faith?! The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't know existed? Is that somehow more palatable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferangled Posted October 25, 2012 Share Posted October 25, 2012 In yesterday's BP, Jatuporn referred to one (single) person seen on security video wearing a black shirt while entering an army base in a police van. No indication that this person was armed, wearing a balaclava, or otherwise disguised - just a poor sartorial choice given 20/20 hindsight. That's it - his only proof that the MIB were connected to the RTA. Given the photographs and video evidence, he then denies the MIB existed. Perhaps less frothing at the mouth and more reading required.... "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." That's General Prayuth Chan-ocha, the Army chief, you know, the army? The ones using live ammunition against a foe that apparently he didn't believe existed? Makes perfect sense... He didn't say he didn't believe they existed. He said he didn't know. Believing and knowing is the same thing in red-spin land. What's to spin here? "Prayuth said he didn't know if the men in black were real." The army chief states that he doesn't know if the men in black are real. The only one that's tried to spin anything here is you by attributing the statement to the wrong person, the quote's fairly self explanatory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now