zaphodbeeblebrox Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Well, now it's official, as to just how mediocre restaurant offerings are in Thailand. Thailand only placed 2 restaurants in a list of the top 101 restaurants in Asia. http://www.thedailymeal.com/101-best-restaurants-asia Bo.lan came in at #66 http://www.bolan.co.th/wordpress/?page_id=12 Nahm came in at #19 http://www.comohotels.com/metropolitanbangkok/dining/nahm/concept What's obvious is that the Thais can't even present their own cuisine in a manner that can compete in gastronomic terms with other Asian offerings. There are more Thai restaurants from other Asian nations on this list, than Thai restaurants in Thailand. Nahm is run by a Londoner, who failed in London, and is trying to demonstrate that Thai dishes can be elegant. Bo.lan is royal thai cuisine, but is run by 2 farang chefs with a Thai advisor chef. Of course, no international cuisine restaurant in Thailand made this list, or probably were even considered. 2
Popular Post Gerald14 Posted May 16, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 16, 2013 Who has this crazy idea about Thai restaurants. I can take you to many Thai Restaurants in Bangkok or Chiang Mai which are in my view top class. Some Thai restaurants over here are amongst the best in the world 5
uptheos Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Who has this crazy idea about Thai restaurants. I can take you to many Thai Restaurants in Bangkok or Chiang Mai which are in my view top class. Some Thai restaurants over here are amongst the best in the world Well, they're certainly among the best in Thailand. 2
Jingthing Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Thai people in general don't seem all that adventurous when it comes to food.
Popular Post stoneyboy Posted May 16, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 16, 2013 Thai people in general don't seem all that adventurous when it comes to food. Or Hygiene for that matter. 7
Popular Post Carib Posted May 16, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 16, 2013 Ah, coming from the Daily Meal, with on the homepage subjects like: How to roll the perfect burrito, the recipe of the day which is easy macaroni and cheese, a list for 10 bucket bars to visit, and also a subject about a study which says that it is embarrassing to carry a MacDonald's bag. Woow, I am impressed .... 3
Popular Post Suradit69 Posted May 16, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 16, 2013 Who has this crazy idea about Thai restaurants. I can take you to many Thai Restaurants in Bangkok or Chiang Mai which are in my view top class. Some Thai restaurants over here are amongst the best in the world It's a bit like art, fine wines, books ... some people have to be told what's good and what's not. In this case, it sounds like someone wants Thai food to be cooked and presented according to some arbitrary effete western generated criteria. In most countries, the best food is prepared and served in restaurants that would never attract the attention of a bunch of self-appointed experts. Do you really need someone to tell you what & where to eat or drink, or what to read or what to hang on your walls? If so, it means you're too afraid to think for yourself and too worried about being trendy. I've never eaten Thai food outside of Thailand that was anywhere near as good as what you can get in some small, non-touristy establishments inside the country, mainly because the touristy places and the Thai restaurants in other countries have to dumb down the food for MacDonald's numbed taste buds. Eating is meant to be a pleasurable experience. Like most pleasurable experiences in life, the only expert on what is best for you is you. If you need to be told what to like, whether it's food, drink, women/men, art, music or whatever, you're probably going be perpetually disappointed. 7
Jingthing Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 (edited) I've never eaten Thai food outside of Thailand that was anywhere near as good as what you can get in some small, non-touristy establishments inside the country, mainly because the touristy places and the Thai restaurants in other countries have to dumb down the food for MacDonald's numbed taste buds. I have. In areas with lots of Thais. Thaitown San Francisco, Thaitown LA, San Jose CA, and Washington DC suburbs. I'd probably agree the MAJORITY of global Thai eateries are dumbed down, but not all. Edited May 16, 2013 by Jingthing
Suradit69 Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 (edited) I've never eaten Thai food outside of Thailand that was anywhere near as good as what you can get in some small, non-touristy establishments inside the country, mainly because the touristy places and the Thai restaurants in other countries have to dumb down the food for MacDonald's numbed taste buds. I have. In areas with lots of Thais. Thaitown San Francisco, Thaitown LA, San Jose CA, and Washington DC suburbs. I'd probably agree the MAJORITY of global Thai eateries are dumbed down, but not all. Haven't eaten Thai food on the west coast, but did try a couple of places around Chicago, another in Lahore, Pakistan and one or two in Dubai. All were major disappointments, but even in Bangkok or Pattaya, I'm not all that thrilled with most of the places that attract mainly tourists. They may have interesting ambience and nice table settings, but the food falls flat. The best food I've had recently was at Ruen Urai off of Surawong in Bangkok and another place on Surawong with the ambience of a bus station, the name of which escapes me at the moment ... both of which do tend to attract tourists ... and from time-to-time small hole-in-the-wall places in Pattaya that tend to frighten away tourists. Edited May 16, 2013 by Suradit69
jbrain Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Who has this crazy idea about Thai restaurants. I can take you to many Thai Restaurants in Bangkok or Chiang Mai which are in my view top class. Some Thai restaurants over here are amongst the best in the world Well, they're certainly among the best in Thailand. I'm a bit surprised that my favorite, at the carwash on third road pattaya, isn't included in the list. One of the better Tom yum khai's I have ever eaten in Thailand, and at 50 Baht including rice............ 2
Jingthing Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 (edited) It's a simple fact. Thai food has not evolved in variety, innovation, and sophistication like other cuisines such as Chinese, French, Peruvian, American, etc. I think there is an argument to be made that Thai cuisine has on sum DEVOLVED. Edited May 16, 2013 by Jingthing
Popular Post AyG Posted May 17, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 17, 2013 "Nahm is run by a Londoner, who failed in London" I presume the OP is referring to David Thompson, who's Australian, not a Londoner. And he didn't by any means fail in London: Nahm (London) was the first Thai restaurant in the world to get a Michelin star, and is still going strong. 5
tinhead Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Has nothing to do with the supposed sad state of restaurants. More the fact that its pretty hard to charge what restaurants outside Thailand- so there's less incentive to excel.
SantiSuk Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Please please Thailand, don't succumb to the pretentiousness of the west when it comes to dining out. An industry designed to remove money willingly from those who have too much to start with!
Baerboxer Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 It's a simple fact. Thai food has not evolved in variety, innovation, and sophistication like other cuisines such as Chinese, French, Peruvian, American, etc. I think there is an argument to be made that Thai cuisine has on sum DEVOLVED. You are joking? American is the second worst least sophisticated food I've eaten (Apart from steaks). French has gone downhill rapidly in the last 20 years. I like real Chinese food, but it doesn't have the variety or instensity that Thai offers. Never tried Peruvian so can't comment. Thai is the world's number 1 cuisine, IMHO, for sheer variety, availability, intensitiy of flavours, textures and combinations. I eaten some marvellous meals in small unpretentious Thai restaurants over the last 30 years; and some in first class restaurants. Each to their own - all a question of taste buds. But I certainly wouldn't put much credance on a publication of this quality. 2
Baerboxer Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 Please please Thailand, don't succumb to the pretentiousness of the west when it comes to dining out. An industry designed to remove money willingly from those who have too much to start with! Yep - Like the so called nouveau cuisine. Very high cost for very little food, cooked and presented pretentiously so you think you're actually getting something for the large bill! Give me noodles and chicken feet any day 1
Baerboxer Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 I've never eaten Thai food outside of Thailand that was anywhere near as good as what you can get in some small, non-touristy establishments inside the country, mainly because the touristy places and the Thai restaurants in other countries have to dumb down the food for MacDonald's numbed taste buds. I have. In areas with lots of Thais. Thaitown San Francisco, Thaitown LA, San Jose CA, and Washington DC suburbs. I'd probably agree the MAJORITY of global Thai eateries are dumbed down, but not all. Haven't eaten Thai food on the west coast, but did try a couple of places around Chicago, another in Lahore, Pakistan and one or two in Dubai. All were major disappointments, but even in Bangkok or Pattaya, I'm not all that thrilled with most of the places that attract mainly tourists. They may have interesting ambience and nice table settings, but the food falls flat. The best food I've had recently was at Ruen Urai off of Surawong in Bangkok and another place on Surawong with the ambience of a bus station, the name of which escapes me at the moment ... both of which do tend to attract tourists ... and from time-to-time small hole-in-the-wall places in Pattaya that tend to frighten away tourists. The Thai Express restaurant in Abu Dhabi's Al Wada mall food court is surprisingly good. The girls serving at the counter are usually Pinay's who greet you with "Sawasdeekhrab". Don't be put off, there are some Thai cooks. The som tam thia poo is realy good, and a big portion. All the other dishes I've eaten there, and they have a good selection, are also authentic and good value. My wife likes it there too.
Jingthing Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 (edited) It's a simple fact. Thai food has not evolved in variety, innovation, and sophistication like other cuisines such as Chinese, French, Peruvian, American, etc. I think there is an argument to be made that Thai cuisine has on sum DEVOLVED. You are joking? American is the second worst least sophisticated food I've eaten (Apart from steaks). French has gone downhill rapidly in the last 20 years. I like real Chinese food, but it doesn't have the variety or instensity that Thai offers. Never tried Peruvian so can't comment. Thai is the world's number 1 cuisine, IMHO, for sheer variety, availability, intensitiy of flavours, textures and combinations. I eaten some marvellous meals in small unpretentious Thai restaurants over the last 30 years; and some in first class restaurants. Each to their own - all a question of taste buds. But I certainly wouldn't put much credance on a publication of this quality. I'm talking about the innovation going on, not the traditional stereotypes. American? Google Alice Waters. Chinese is MUCH more varied than Thai food! No contest. There are many many regional variations. Intensity? Real Sechuan blows the socks of anything Thai. Peruvian innovative chefs are globally very hot. Thai chefs are hot to cook the SAME old stuff. Big difference. French. I don't really have a strong opinion. I know amazing stuff is happening in Spain though. Edited May 17, 2013 by Jingthing 1
Dancealot Posted May 17, 2013 Posted May 17, 2013 To the OP, the Thai restaurants don't have to compete. And i am quite sure they will never have to, because they are authentic. This does not take away the fact that french or Korean cuisine for example have their own distinctive signature and are delicious in their own way. Why compare?
Popular Post theseahorse Posted May 18, 2013 Popular Post Posted May 18, 2013 Struggling to find one sentence in the OP that is actually true. There's 4 Bangkok restaurants on the list (although one isn't Thai food) As already mentioned, Nahm is run by an Aussie (who is probably the world expert on Thai food) who ran a Michelin starred Thai restaurant in London before moving it to Bangkok. Bo.lan is run by a Thai/ Aussie couple, not two farang and an advisor. She also just won the best female chef in Asia award from the San Pellegrino 50 Best (which is probably the most revered list going) . There are plenty of Thai's doing amazing food here, both fine dining and more relaxed. The lack of Thai restaurants is more a sign of how bad this list is. 4
AyG Posted May 19, 2013 Posted May 19, 2013 One aspect of this that hasn't been touched in the discussion so far is that Thai people eat Thai food at home (duh!). They're not going to go out to eat something they can cook themselves. If you look at the chain restaurants popular with the middle classes, you find (very pseudo-) Japanese and Korean places are probably the most popular, along with junk American fast food. There simply isn't the market here to sustain more refined versions of Thai cuisine outside the major tourist areas - and even then, the food will be mostly "adjusted" for the foreign palate.
Gangnamstein Posted May 22, 2013 Posted May 22, 2013 some the more creative and delicious Thai restaurants I've been to would never make it on that.... or even TripAdvisor for that matter.
Jingthing Posted May 22, 2013 Posted May 22, 2013 (edited) The way I see the OP is this. If a hot new Thai restaurant opens in San Francisco, the food savvy public expects another take on TRADITIONAL Thai food (as known in the U.S.). If a hot new Peruvian restaurant opens in San Francisco, the food savvy public expects a world class creative Peruvian chef doing innovative interpretations of Peruvian food. Not saying good or bad. That's just the international profile Thai food has now. Part of this is about fashion and the new and exciting factor. Thai food is not new and exciting. http://soshiok.com/article/21919 Spurred by a combination of unique factors, notably the country'smelting-pot culture, well-travelled chefs influenced by the gastronomicrevolution in places such as France and Spain, plus a younger generationof local chefs dedicated to modern cooking techniques and working withhigh-quality indigenous ingredients, Peru is arguably the Next Big Placeon the global dining scene. (Yes, I've been. It's fantastic.) Edited May 22, 2013 by Jingthing
cardholder Posted May 22, 2013 Posted May 22, 2013 Please please Thailand, don't succumb to the pretentiousness of the west when it comes to dining out. An industry designed to remove money willingly from those who have too much to start with! Yep - Like the so called nouveau cuisine. Very high cost for very little food, cooked and presented pretentiously so you think you're actually getting something for the large bill! Give me noodles and chicken feet any day Says a lot about the credibility of your post at #15...................
smokie36 Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 The way I see the OP is this. If a hot new Thai restaurant opens in San Francisco, the food savvy public expects another take on TRADITIONAL Thai food (as known in the U.S.). If a hot new Peruvian restaurant opens in San Francisco, the food savvy public expects a world class creative Peruvian chef doing innovative interpretations of Peruvian food. Not saying good or bad. That's just the international profile Thai food has now. Part of this is about fashion and the new and exciting factor. Thai food is not new and exciting. http://soshiok.com/article/21919 Spurred by a combination of unique factors, notably the country's melting-pot culture, well-travelled chefs influenced by the gastronomic revolution in places such as France and Spain, plus a younger generation of local chefs dedicated to modern cooking techniques and working with high-quality indigenous ingredients, Peru is arguably the Next Big Place on the global dining scene. (Yes, I've been. It's fantastic.) The culinary guide to Guinea Pig?
Jingthing Posted May 23, 2013 Posted May 23, 2013 The culinary guide to Guinea Pig? Shows how much you know about it.
Gangnamstein Posted May 29, 2013 Posted May 29, 2013 More Thai restaurants on the list are outside of Thailand? That's not so inconceivable. Perhaps the more successful Thai restaurateurs take their businesses to more profitable areas outside the country?
Jingthing Posted May 29, 2013 Posted May 29, 2013 I think it isn't so much about how many restaurants are on lists, but the general international public perception of the international brand: Thai food. I think that's something like, we like it, we know what it is, it doesn't seem to be going anywhere NEW though.
ricklev Posted May 29, 2013 Posted May 29, 2013 The Thai food in the good Thai restaurants in LA's Thai town is fantastic. The quality of the produce available in the USA is 1000 times better than here and the good Thai chefs really know how to use it to prepare all the classic northern, southern, and Isaan dishes.
riceyummm Posted June 29, 2013 Posted June 29, 2013 I've never eaten Thai food outside of Thailand that was anywhere near as good as what you can get in some small, non-touristy establishments inside the country, mainly because the touristy places and the Thai restaurants in other countries have to dumb down the food for MacDonald's numbed taste buds. I have. In areas with lots of Thais. Thaitown San Francisco, Thaitown LA, San Jose CA, and Washington DC suburbs. I'd probably agree the MAJORITY of global Thai eateries are dumbed down, but not all. JT, where is Thaitown in SF?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now