Jump to content

The Complications Of The Yingluck-Thawil Confrontation: Thai Talk


Recommended Posts

Posted

THAI TALK
The complications of the Yingluck-Thawil confrontation

Suthichai Yoon
The Nation

BANGKOK: -- Expect a drawn-out battle between Premier Yingluck Shinawatra and Thawil Pliensri, the former secretary-general of the National Security Council (NSC), who is demanding to be reinstated in his former post. The Administration Court last week ruled that the premier must give him his job back.

Several complications are bound to emerge. For one thing, the premier isn't likely to comply with the court's order immediately. Thawil was a tough-talking bureaucrat who mounted a relentless campaign against being transferred from his NSC post to become an adviser to the prime minister. He wasn't considered "one of us" within the Yingluck government, which almost immediately upon taking office replaced Thawil with an "insider" - Lieutenant General Paradon Pattanatarbutr.

Thawil fought the case vehemently. He claimed that the transfer was carried out unfairly and that he had done nothing wrong to deserve the move. The official line was that the transfer was aimed at "boosting efficiency in implementing government policies because Thawil is well versed in national security affairs and would be better able to serve the government as adviser to the prime minister".

Thawil took the matter up with the Administration Court, seeking a return to the post, citing unfair practices. The court sided with Thawil, saying the premier's official reason for the transfer did not match real action. Part of the ruling read: "The position of NSC secretary-general carries a higher degree of responsibility (than that of a premier's adviser) and the incumbent could offer advice to the prime minister (without having to be transferred anyway…")

The court also ruled that the transfer had been carried out in violation of normal practices, which state that a recipient unit must initiate the move by seeking the superior's approval before putting a written request to the work unit of the person involved. That process apparently wasn't followed.

Once politicians are in power, they tend to think they can move bureaucrats around without having to comply with the established rules. Or perhaps the premier might have been ill advised, having just taken office, on how to reshuffle technocrats around without facing legal proceedings.

Technically, Prime Minister Yingluck doesn't have to comply with the court's order immediately. She has the right of appeal - and there is little doubt that she will pursue that path. Accepting the verdict without putting up a fight would entail further problems. Several other prominent bureaucrats who have complained about being edged out of their positions for "political reasons" have lodged similar complaints. Those who haven't done so might be emboldened by Thawil's case.

Thawil himself has made no secret of his desire to encourage others in a similar situation to follow his example. He told reporters: "My advice to government officials who have been maltreated the same way is not to submit to political pressure. If you are bullied, don't go down on your knees to ask for mercy. That is futile. You should follow the procedure available to you. That means to fight. To win or lose is another thing. Bureaucrats shouldn't fight among themselves. In most cases it's the politicians who bully officials."

Another possible complication is related to the fragile ongoing "peace talks" in the deep South with representatives from the Barisan Revolusi Nasional-Coordinate. The official Thai delegation is led by the current NSC secretary-general, Lieutenant General Paradon. The fact that the incumbent might have to vacate his seat to make way for his predecessor's return has thrown a spanner in the works.

The opposition Democrat Party's deputy leader, Thaworn Senneam, has already called for postponement of the peace dialogue until the government resolves the uncertainty over the leadership at the NSC.

The premier will have to decide how to handle this highly sensitive issue that has both domestic and regional consequences.

It's a Catch-22 situation for the premier. If she doesn't appeal against the verdict, her political clout will be dented. If she does, Thawil is set to mount a second attack. He says he will take the case to the National Anti-Corruption Commission if the premier decides to appeal, "in order to protect myself from further persecution".

Either way, the battle promises to be a long, painful one.

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-06-07

Posted

This no doubt will go to appeal and depending on the court calendar could take time for the Supreme Administrative Court to hear it which would suit Yingluck since she would not have to act on the lower courts judgement.

If the upper court ratifies the decision it becomes Shakespearean for Yingluck " to obey or not to obey that is the question ? ", will the government decide to ignore the court as it hasn't returned a verdict they like. They are arrogant enough.

  • Like 1
Posted

Here we have a government elected by the Reds on the basis of removing the old "elite" system, only to prove that they are removing the old elite and replacing it with their own mouthpieces to further their own goals for the "S" family and its cronies, not to help the poor reds who were duped into voting for them beyond rice scams and tablets that don't work for 6 year olds, but only to help themselves to more and more and more. The government elected seems to believe its election gives it a mandate to appoint anyone it sees fit to the administrative bureaucracy to help it achieve its goals of complete power and control, especially over budgets and projects. It is this lack of separation of the various sections of government, executive, legislative, judicial, administrative that will lead to absolute power for the reds elected government and dictatorship for the country led by the puppets of you know who. They already control the police and to a great extent the military. Congratulations Thailand, seems you have the government you wanted, enjoy!

  • Like 2
Posted

Thai government politicking reminds me of a dog chasing its own tail -- masses of energy expended in trying to achieve a futile goal, without the intelligence or self-awareness to appreciate the stupidity of the action.

Meanwhile, the rest of the people carry on their lives with the lousy education, rotten police, corrupt officialdom and shabby public healthcare.

They say that every electorate gets the government it deserves, but I wonder what the Thai people have done to deserve the ones they have now, no matter which faction of "elites" are in power..

  • Like 1
Posted

Thai government politicking reminds me of a dog chasing its own tail -- masses of energy expended in trying to achieve a futile goal, without the intelligence or self-awareness to appreciate the stupidity of the action.

Meanwhile, the rest of the people carry on their lives with the lousy education, rotten police, corrupt officialdom and shabby public healthcare.

They say that every electorate gets the government it deserves, but I wonder what the Thai people have done to deserve the ones they have now, no matter which faction of "elites" are in power..

Unfortunately it probably all comes down to ignorance and apathy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...