Jump to content

Outgoing Constitutional Court president was bold and controversial


webfact

Recommended Posts

SPECIAL REPORT
Outgoing court president was bold and controversial

Opas Boonlom
The Nation

30210678-01_big.jpg

Wasan leaves his mark in a short time

BANGKOK: -- The career of Constitutional Court president Wasan Soypisudh, who has resigned before completing his nine-year term, was at times colourful, courageous and controversial.

Wasan, who tendered his resignation from the positions of both president and judge of the court effective from August 1, said he had promised his colleagues he would not stay beyond two years, and that his mission was accomplished.

Wasan, 66, was a brilliant law student at Thammasat University and graduated at the age of 20 with honours and passed the bar exam before turning 21. He then embarked on his career in the judiciary, holding numerous positions, including president of the Supreme Court's labour division, from which he retired at the age of 60.

During the 1991-1992 "judicial crisis", Wasan was a vocal assistant judge who joined the protest against perceived political interference in the appointment of judges, which led to his being reassigned. He became even more widely known in 2006 when he applied to become a member of the Election Commission but failed.

Wasan was later appointed as a Constitutional Court judge in May 2008. In August 24, 2011, he was unanimously appointed president of the court. He could have stayed on until 2017 for his term to be completed.

Opponents may regard Wasan as being pro-Democrat Party. When he had newly graduated, a senior person took him to see the former PM and ex-Democrat Party boss Seni Pramoj, and he became an intern at Seni's law firm.

As a Supreme Court judge, Wasan was the presiding judge who handed down a two-year imprisonment term on former PM Thaksin Shinawatra for assisting his wife in the Ratchada land purchase deal.

More recently, he was among the Constitutional Court judges who examined a petition as to whether the House of Representatives could rewrite the 2007 charter without a referendum. The answer was no, leading to a deadlock, as a result MPs could not proceed with the third reading. The judges, including Wasan, concluded that such a move would violate Article 68 that forbids any action likely to overthrow the governing system.

Opponents criticised the judges for not waiting for the Office of the Attorney-General to forward the matter to the court. In reply, Wasan said: "Regarding a matter of grave importance such as the changing of the political system, can we really wait for the Office of the Attorney-General?"

Another important decision, in which he played a role, was the termination of the MP status of red-shirt co-leader Jatuporn Promphan who could not vote in the 2011 general election as he was detained.

Court spokesman Pimol Tham-pitakpong said yesterday that since taking up the position on April 24, 2011, Wasan has revamped the Constitutional Court's administration system. He has also pushed to improve the court's performance, stressing that cases must be completed within one year.

In early 2012, the court had 123 unfinished cases and has now finished 109 of those, he said, adding that it was currently dealing with 30 cases.

Wasan's resignation will not affect the composition of the court as there are still eight judges left and future rulings will likely remain the same.

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-07-18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last sentence says " future decisions will likely remain the same " but same as what, have they been decided in advance ?

The courts's work must be affected as 9 judges allow for a majority decision not a lot of 4 - 4 " hung " splits.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last sentence says " future decisions will likely remain the same " but same as what, have they been decided in advance ?

The courts's work must be affected as 9 judges allow for a majority decision not a lot of 4 - 4 " hung " splits.

If they keep getting hung decisions I would suggest the laws are very badly written.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last sentence says " future decisions will likely remain the same " but same as what, have they been decided in advance ?

The courts's work must be affected as 9 judges allow for a majority decision not a lot of 4 - 4 " hung " splits.

If they keep getting hung decisions I would suggest the laws are very badly written.

It's not the laws it's interpretation. How about 4 red and 4 other colours judges ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last sentence says " future decisions will likely remain the same " but same as what, have they been decided in advance ?

The courts's work must be affected as 9 judges allow for a majority decision not a lot of 4 - 4 " hung " splits.

If they keep getting hung decisions I would suggest the laws are very badly written.

It's not the laws it's interpretation. How about 4 red and 4 other colours judges ?

That's even worse. The best judges in the country judging on political lines. Whoooppeee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the 1991-1992 "judicial crisis", Wasan was a vocal assistant judge who joined the protest against perceived political interference in the appointment of judges, which led to his being reassigned. He became even more widely known in 2006 when he applied to become a member of the Election Commission but failed.

A clear message regarding the election commission PEOPLE WITH INTEGRITY NOT WELCOME.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last sentence says " future decisions will likely remain the same " but same as what, have they been decided in advance ?

The courts's work must be affected as 9 judges allow for a majority decision not a lot of 4 - 4 " hung " splits.

If they keep getting hung decisions I would suggest the laws are very badly written.

It's not the laws it's interpretation. How about 4 red and 4 other colours judges ?

That's even worse. The best judges in the country judging on political lines. Whoooppeee

Thaksin escaped when a Constitutional Court judge voted Not Guilty because he wanted to give him a chance since he was PM, that's what he said anyway, but thought he was guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last sentence says " future decisions will likely remain the same " but same as what, have they been decided in advance ?

The courts's work must be affected as 9 judges allow for a majority decision not a lot of 4 - 4 " hung " splits.

If they keep getting hung decisions I would suggest the laws are very badly written.

It's not the laws it's interpretation. How about 4 red and 4 other colours judges ?

That's even worse. The best judges in the country judging on political lines. Whoooppeee

Thaksin escaped when a Constitutional Court judge voted Not Guilty because he wanted to give him a chance since he was PM, that's what he said anyway, but thought he was guilty.

And look how well that turned out. 10 years of cr*p so far...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This man confessed that the decisions he made were politically motivated and NOT based on the law!

Sorry I missed that could you please post the quote and references.

""If the country at that time had been peaceful, the government and the opposition could have joined hands, the country could have moved forward, and I believe most of the judges would have decided not to dissolve the parties," he said. "But the country at that time was chaotic and the Constitution Court had to use its judgement to maintain law and order,"

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Charter-court-chief-focuses-on-balance-30202064.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good judge deserves a pat on the back, well done sir, you tried to keep the barstards honest, your job was to say the least difficult , you had many adverse opponents to the legal interpretations of the constitution and threatening behaviour from some quarters of thai society, thankyou for holding up the law on all occasions , good luck .clap2.gifclap2.gifclap2.gifclap2.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This man confessed that the decisions he made were politically motivated and NOT based on the law!

Sorry I missed that could you please post the quote and references.

""If the country at that time had been peaceful, the government and the opposition could have joined hands, the country could have moved forward, and I believe most of the judges would have decided not to dissolve the parties," he said. "But the country at that time was chaotic and the Constitution Court had to use its judgement to maintain law and order,"

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Charter-court-chief-focuses-on-balance-30202064.html

Nothing wrong with that statement IMO.

All courts should use their judgement to maintain law & order. Unfortunately some of those judges used that principle to let Thaksin escape free from his assets 'honest mistakes'. Sanoh & T's wife got at those judges & Thailand is still suffering from that decision.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...