MartinL Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 (edited) I know there are 3 verbs in Thai that can be translated as "to be" in different circumstances:- yuuL อยู่ bpenM เป็น kheuuM คือ I have no problem with the first one, which is related to location but the final 2 are causing some confusion. The conclusions I've drawn when reading my books suggest that, among other things:- bpenM เป็น -- implies a temporary condition, eg "I have a cold (but I'll get better one day)" or "She's my friend (but that might change)" kheuuM คือ -- implies a permanent condition, eg "I am human (and will always be)", although nowhere does any book actually mention a temporary/permanent distinction, that's just my interpretation. If you know any Spanish, it seems to me to be similar to the way in which "estar" and "ser" are used. No doubt there are other considerations but the apparent temporary/permanent distinction is what is causing me problems. Maybe I've got it completely wrong. If so, please give me some more accurate information. Many thanks. Edited September 11, 2013 by MartinL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 (edited) Not really. For example, I am human may as well be said as ผมเป็นคน In fact both คือ and เป็น can be used interchangeably in most circumstances. Edited September 11, 2013 by Mole 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolf5370 Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 (edited) To me Bpen is used for titles, nationality, affiliation, things attached to an individual - Like I am an Englishman. Where as, Kheu is more general; and usually used with inanimate things such as : This is a pencil. //Edit: This kind of goes against your Permanent/Transient view I guess: Bpen kon Ungrit (I am English) is pretty permanent; where as, kheu khaa-jang-khan-dam sahm roy baht can change (minimum wage is 300 baht) Edited September 11, 2013 by wolf5370 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajaan Posted September 11, 2013 Share Posted September 11, 2013 อยู่ is the verb equivalent (in some usages) to estar. Get a good grammar like Higbie and Thinsan's "Thai Reference Grammar" and you will find things like this explained in great detail by professionals, with lots of examples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyG Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 คือ is typically used when what follows it expands upon what precedes it. In other words, you're adding some sort of explanation. I tend to think of it as meaning "that is to say". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriswillems Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 I think the most used "to be" in Thai, is the one that is not written. ผมตัวสูง I "am" tall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajaan Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 I think the most used "to be" in Thai, is the one that is not written. ผมตัวสูง I "am" tall. Well, in all SEAsian languages, the verb "to be" is NEVER used with adjectives...simple rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delight Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 อยู่ is the verb equivalent (in some usages) to estar. Get a good grammar like Higbie and Thinsan's "Thai Reference Grammar" and you will find things like this explained in great detail by professionals, with lots of examples. Hope that you are right-just bought the book based on your recommendation 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preahko Posted September 12, 2013 Share Posted September 12, 2013 อยู่ is the verb equivalent (in some usages) to estar. Get a good grammar like Higbie and Thinsan's "Thai Reference Grammar" and you will find things like this explained in great detail by professionals, with lots of examples. Hope that you are right-just bought the book based on your recommendation I think you'll find it useful...I have all of the Thai reference grammars that have come out in the past 10 or so years, and I feel that one is the most practical and informative for language learners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now