Jump to content

The Good The Bad & The Ugly - What makes a photograph?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

As a newbie and enthousaist, I would like to add every single one of you who posted here have shown me a new world, I couldn't possibly have discovered by myself.

Thank you.

wai2.gif

Isn't discovery wonderful?!

Feel free to PM me on any questions you have; anytime.

Posted

A million years ago back in Art College, we would have critiques of each other's work continually. Several times a week we would post images in front of the group and we would listen to some very frank and aggressive criticism. Sometimes a professor would even rip an image in half (particularly if there were focus issues). Those of us who took it in stride and listened carefully, grew into better photographers. Those that couldn't handle it became defensive and stagnated.

Unfortunately we cannot have the same type of critiques here, because people are too sensitive. But my advice to all photographers is to keep searching for criticism, some of it will be useless, but you will find a grain of truth in all of it.

I'd be grateful for aggressive critiques of photos I post here. It would help me.

Posted

For me it's the idea of the photo. If there is something unexpected, the better.

that is interesting.... an image that lies? Thanks for that oilinki.

Art is propaganda.

Something that makes you believe it is what it is not.

A photo? A piece of paper that looks like a landscape, portrait or..something other than paper.

A painting? The same on canvas.

Sculpture? A rock that looks like something other than a rock.

It's all propaganda.

Posted

For me it's the idea of the photo. If there is something unexpected, the better.

that is interesting.... an image that lies? Thanks for that oilinki.

Art is propaganda.

Something that makes you believe it is what it is not.

A photo? A piece of paper that looks like a landscape, portrait or..something other than paper.

A painting? The same on canvas.

Sculpture? A rock that looks like something other than a rock.

It's all propaganda.

communist_bark.jpg

Posted

As a newbie and enthousaist, I would like to add every single one of you who posted here have shown me a new world, I couldn't possibly have discovered by myself.

Thank you.

wai2.gif

Tks-a-lot thumbsup.gif

Who else could post this, but

Kan Win w00t.gif

Posted

For me it's the idea of the photo. If there is something unexpected, the better.

that is interesting.... an image that lies? Thanks for that oilinki.

Art is propaganda.

Something that makes you believe it is what it is not.

A photo? A piece of paper that looks like a landscape, portrait or..something other than paper.

A painting? The same on canvas.

Sculpture? A rock that looks like something other than a rock.

It's all propaganda.

sorry willy this thread is for people with a mental age above 12, come back when you have something to say.

Posted

A million years ago back in Art College, we would have critiques of each other's work continually. Several times a week we would post images in front of the group and we would listen to some very frank and aggressive criticism. Sometimes a professor would even rip an image in half (particularly if there were focus issues). Those of us who took it in stride and listened carefully, grew into better photographers. Those that couldn't handle it became defensive and stagnated.

Unfortunately we cannot have the same type of critiques here, because people are too sensitive. But my advice to all photographers is to keep searching for criticism, some of it will be useless, but you will find a grain of truth in all of it.

+1 ..honest advice and wise observation from canuckamuck.

  • Like 1
Posted
I shoot while riding my bike, and for me, success is not having one remaining shot at the end of the day. It is having a multitude of memories and having seen things, which I may not have seen, without the aid of my camera. Some images make it to the computer, while others only exist in the neural pathways of my mind.
Carrying a camera on my mountain bike rides just adds to the joy and exertion of riding the trails, and the day it becomes work or distracts from that joy, is the day I will begin leaving it at home in the closet. You can suffer for you art if you choose but for me it is fun or none.
I am getting too old to do things to please others but if it brings me joy, perhaps it will do the same for others, so I share. For me photography is not a serious thing used to beat others over the head in a show of dominance or superiority.

It seems to me it is you who is always beating people over the head with your holier than thou preaching

-for arguments sake i am assuming you are a farmer and this is something you care about.That after preparing ,leveling the ground and planting, you are excited when the first shoots appear and even more so when it is a quality crop.That you are disappointed when you see careless and uncaring farming practices when it is just as easy to do it correctly.

If i turned up on the Farming Forum saying why are you guys so hung up about getting it right , it's only farming, you don't have to try too hard, just enjoy the digging , it's therapeutic it dosn't matter if anything grows, you might assume i am a self absorbed prick with no empathy.

Posted (edited)

Sorry I am not a farmer and never have been. I do recognize someone in those last six words, however.tongue.png biggrin.png

I am not saying you can’t have your own opinion, I am just saying I do not agree that it is the only way of looking at things.smile.png

Edited by villagefarang
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

For me it's the idea of the photo. If there is something unexpected, the better.

that is interesting.... an image that lies? Thanks for that oilinki.

Art is propaganda.

Something that makes you believe it is what it is not.

A photo? A piece of paper that looks like a landscape, portrait or..something other than paper.

A painting? The same on canvas.

Sculpture? A rock that looks like something other than a rock.

It's all propaganda.

sorry willy this thread is for people with a mental age above 12, come back when you have something to say.

Your comments are always so insightful, intellectual and mature Watutsi!

Thank you so much for the constructive input.

You have changed my outlook on life, art and TV posters!

I am an avid photographer.

I should have known that the concept of art being propaganda ( one I learned in school ) could be beyond the reach of some TV posters

Do you have any examples of your photography or any artwork you could share with those not on your level yet?

Here is an example of mine.

I only hope it is not too far below your standards.

I have a great shot of a jack ass I took last month, but figure you see one of those daily.

Try some camels instead!

Thanks again for the constructive comment!

post-147745-0-09621700-1383101880_thumb.

Edited by willyumiii
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It seems to me it is you who is always beating people over the head with your holier than thou preaching

-for arguments sake i am assuming you are a farmer and this is something you care about.That after preparing ,leveling the ground and planting, you are excited when the first shoots appear and even more so when it is a quality crop.That you are disappointed when you see careless and uncaring farming practices when it is just as easy to do it correctly.

If i turned up on the Farming Forum saying why are you guys so hung up about getting it right , it's only farming, you don't have to try too hard, just enjoy the digging , it's therapeutic it dosn't matter if anything grows, you might assume i am a self absorbed prick with no empathy.

I'm quite sure that villagefarang would in that case have wisdom to put things in perspective. The farming for you would be a hobby, which gives you a real joy.

Is there a reason for an corporate farmer to put the person who is learning to garden his 4m2 field down? Is there a reason to do the same in photography?

For me your attitude towards others is what could be described as teenager thug coming to kindergarten to bully the younger kids. Someone trying to push others down and thinks that it would increase his or hers status. Boy or a girl who thinks he/she is on the top of the world, but still lack the wisdom of the life.

I have seen the same attitude in tech forums. Nerds who are laughing to the people who are just learning how to use new operating system. It saddens me every time. That behavior is kind of ok on the very higher levels, where the game is hard and people in general are on the same page, but it should never be visible on the user levels.

Edited by Guest
Posted (edited)

For me it's the idea of the photo. If there is something unexpected, the better. When a image makes me think and then giggle, it has done it's job.

I do value the high quality shoots, which can give tranquility and atmosphere to the images. But to be honest, if those lack the idea, it's couple of seconds and I'm looking the next image.

Like you, I enjoy the unexpected that can make me giggle as well.

I took this unexpected shot last year.

It still makes me giggle.

Not Ansel Adams quality, but it does meet the aforementioned criteria.

She doesn't seem to be impressed enough to even stop eating but, it seems her girlfriend may be interested in getting some!

post-147745-0-71658000-1383103132_thumb.

Edited by willyumiii
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It seems to me it is you who is always beating people over the head with your holier than thou preaching

-for arguments sake i am assuming you are a farmer and this is something you care about.That after preparing ,leveling the ground and planting, you are excited when the first shoots appear and even more so when it is a quality crop.That you are disappointed when you see careless and uncaring farming practices when it is just as easy to do it correctly.

If i turned up on the Farming Forum saying why are you guys so hung up about getting it right , it's only farming, you don't have to try too hard, just enjoy the digging , it's therapeutic it dosn't matter if anything grows, you might assume i am a self absorbed prick with no empathy.

I'm quite sure that villagefarang would in that case have wisdom to put things in perspective. The farming for you would be a hobby, which gives you a real joy.

Is there a reason for an corporate farmer to put the person who is learning to garden his 4m2 field down? Is there a reason to do the same in photography?

For me your attitude towards others is what could be described as teenager thug coming to kindergarten to bully the younger kids. Someone trying to push others down and thinks that it would increase his or hers status. Boy or a girl who thinks he/she is on the top of the world, but still lack the wisdom of the life.

I have seen the same attitude in tech forums. Nerds who are laughing to the people who are just learning how to use new operating system. It saddens me every time. That behavior is kind of ok on the very higher levels, where the game is hard and people in general are on the same page, but it should never be visible on the user levels.

In all the years on this forum, i have barely made a comment to anyone, i have posted some pictures, again pretty much without comment. I have never criticized anyone elses pictures, nor would i.This particular thread was a general discussion, i presumed amongst grown ups, about what is a good picture and how best to achieve same.I happened to mention i hated complacency,, which seems fair game in the context, only to be attacked as an elitist snob, i defended myself, what do you expect, if it got too personal my apologies to villagefarang and willy.

Other than the comments to the previous 2 dear souls everything was meant in a general sense that if you want to improve your photography [ which was what the thread is about] you have too really care and as Canuckamuck said be ready to accept criticism. There is no criticism on this forum which is understandable given the state of internet banter, but any discussion of photography needs positive criticism.It was my opinion that the photography forum had become "broke' There was on the one hand a kaleidoscope of images coming in from all over Thailand which was interesting too see much of the unseen, but because of the amount all intimate interchange that previously made the forum interesting were pushed off the page. Ok so nothing stays the same but surely with a little bit of effort the forum could be organized to include all the images that are meant as nothing more than "i am here this is now" and photographs that people want to discuss in a continuing slower format than hundreds of images being posted everyday.Maybe nobody cares and everyone is happy with the way thing are, so no problem, i'll just go and be an o.a.p. teenage thug somewhere else.

No, don't go anywhere!

frankie-howerd2.jpg

Edited by MJP
  • Like 1
Posted

Simple really. Content, composition, exposure and most of all LIGHT . These are the absolute ingredients of a successful image. If any of the above are missing, the image fails. The content element is, of course, personnel appeal.

PP to taste fine tunes the above.

For me, I try to SEE a finished image, rather than LOOK for something that might (or might not) be there.

Then in PP I attempt to reproduce what I saw as best as I can, i.e. pre-visualisation. If I can't pre-visualise an image, I don't shoot it.

Photography is a skill in as much as it requires technique to perceive and achieve your goal.

Snapping away on a wing and a prayer is pointless, it produces nothing.

That's what I think anyway!

http://reeray.smugmug.com/

If you are anything of a photographer ,I do not see your points

1]LIGHT--- is the 'most of all' ingredient for a successful image

2] 'snapping away on a wing and a prayer' is pointless-------- sorry my friend but some exceptional shots have been produced at random coffee1.gifcoffee1.gif

Posted

Simple really. Content, composition, exposure and most of all LIGHT . These are the absolute ingredients of a successful image. If any of the above are missing, the image fails. The content element is, of course, personnel appeal.

PP to taste fine tunes the above.

For me, I try to SEE a finished image, rather than LOOK for something that might (or might not) be there.

Then in PP I attempt to reproduce what I saw as best as I can, i.e. pre-visualisation. If I can't pre-visualise an image, I don't shoot it.

Photography is a skill in as much as it requires technique to perceive and achieve your goal.

Snapping away on a wing and a prayer is pointless, it produces nothing.

That's what I think anyway!

http://reeray.smugmug.com/

If you are anything of a photographer ,I do not see your points

1]LIGHT--- is the 'most of all' ingredient for a successful image

2] 'snapping away on a wing and a prayer' is pointless-------- sorry my friend but some exceptional shots have been produced at random coffee1.gifcoffee1.gif

I find this. I'll go through the RAW files for the days shooting and some of the ones I thought would be great turn out disappointing but some of the random ones I think, "no, I can do something with that".

Posted

“I've missed more than 9,000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games.

Twenty-six times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed.

I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed."

– Michael Jordan

I never knew that baseball player could have given such inspirational quote, but that's due my own simplemindess. Real champs know how to be humble, they also know that they hold one skill, while others hold other kind of skills.

If we think of a kid who have just lost the game for the team, hears that quote. That's the way to get up and try more and try to be better.

I would like to see the advanced photographers along us being like big brother or wise old people who give advices to the rest of us. "That's nice, but how do you think if you would crop the image to this.. let me show how I would see it being better".

Critique can be constructive, which basically means that it include sharing knowledge to photographers who have less skills. Then again it does not mean that every photographer should follow the masters ways to become copy of the master.

I consider the photo forum as playground. I still remember how nervous I was when I posted my first photo to the Evaluate my photo forum. When I got positive feedback my feeling was out of the roof. Ever since photo forum has been a island on the Thaivisa land, where I can escape to see what images and real feelings other members has been willing to share with all of us.

I think that it as a playground as it has been a place with very little restrictions. A place with very little negative criticism. We, developing hobbyist photographers, have been able to put our photos for other to see and comment. Some of the photos are not so great and some have been something to be proud of. Every time I get the golden star (3 likes), I shake my butt a bit. It just feels good and that feeling makes me to try a bit more.

That is the feeling I wish not to loose on this forum.

Posted

@oilinki...

" Every time I get the golden star (3 likes), I shake my butt a bit. It just feels good and that feeling makes me to try a bit more."

That's what this entire section of TVF is supposed to be about...a place to share & hopefully a place to learn...

without walking in the footsteps of mentors...then it's just copying.

BTW...I remember M. Jordan as a great basketball player but I know from the media that some B-Ball players

also play baseball...for what that's worth!

  • Like 1
Posted

You can read all the bumf ever written about photography but it is not going to improve your picture taking. The proof of the pudding of course is in pictures, firstly immerse yourself in pictures, millions of them, of every genre , fashion ,street, wildlife, reportage, advertising, etc.Try and understand why a picture is regarded as great as opposed to good,Figure out how it was taken, it dosn't matter how wrong you are, you have just created a new way to take a picture. Go out and take lots of pictures, don,t doddle, just shoot , you only get one chance in every lifetime to shoot that particular moment.In another post i said that luck was the secret weapon of all photographers, but there is another secret weapon , editing. Discard everything you are not sure of, then do it again then do it again,if you are left with 1 picture at the end of it all, it is a big success.

Nothing like winding up with a blatant cliche but studying one good picture will tell you more than thousands of words of photographic thesis .

I have thought about this all day, watutsi.

Thank you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...