Jump to content

Attorney General reviews decision to not indict ex-PM Thaksin


Recommended Posts

Posted

Attorney General reviews decision to not indict ex-PM Thaksin
By English News

13830116831969.jpg

BANGKOK, OCT 29 – Thailand’s Attorney General will review an earlier decision not to press terrorism charge against former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, according to its spokesman.

Nantasak Poolsak said the move was in response to a complaint to the Office of the Attorney General seeking to revise the earlier conclusion by then attorney general Chulasingh Vasantasingh not to indict Mr Thaksin for instigating the mass rally which led to a large-scale political upheaval in Bangkok in 2010.

Newly-appointed Attorney General Athapol Yaisawang set up a committee to discuss Mr Chulasingh’s decision against the indictment and promised to treat the case fairly.

It depends on whether the committee finds new evidence to charge Mr Thaksin and reverse the former attorney general’s decision, said Mr Nantasak.

Vinai Damrongmongkolkul, inspector general, will lead the investigation committee. Mr Vinai was director general of the Special Case Department and spokesman in Mr Chulasingh’s administration.

Watcharin Panurattana, deputy spokesman, said it was the attorney general’s authority to seek the extradition of a suspect abroad if the case was pending the court’s verdict.

If a culprit flees the country after a court judgement, the court is in charge of issuing an arrest warrant, while the National Police Bureau and the Foreign Ministry are responsible for bringing him back to the country, he said. (MCOT online news)

tnalogo.jpg
-- TNA 2013-10-29

Posted

mmmmm . . . more hot air? smoke and mirrors?

Look everyone, watch the spinning plates on sticks.

(hopefully you won't notice what is really going on)

  • Like 2
Posted

If the "evidence" in the case mentioned in the OP doesn't stick, maybe the Attorney General should have a look at Dear Leaders War on drugs, the Tak Bai "incident" or the Krung Se killings.

Sure there are no statute of limitations for massmurder??

attachicon.giftakbai.jpg

The public calls it massmurder but Thaksin and his cronies will call it political and therefor they will receive amnesty.

  • Like 1
Posted

It may be a thought that the ruling party will wait until they feel the amnesty bill passage is a sure thing, then and only then, will they reverse the no bill against Thaksin and feel its ok to bring charges against him. Of course the then passage of the assumed proven amnesty bill will make it a moot point as there will now a clean slate for all

  • Like 1
Posted

I am wondering if the new AG might have a political bias, rather than being unbiased, first he decides to drop the terrorism charges against Thaksin and the decides to charge Abhisit and Suthep. If there is sufficient evidence to warrent the dropping of charges against a furgitive who is on the run, then fine, and if there is sufficient evidence to indict someone who was carrying out thier duty against an armed mob that had terrorised the populace, invaded a hospital and set fire to at least one building in the commercial heart of the city causing disruption to the livelihoods of a large number of retailers, then go ahead. If however, the AG is acting with political bias, then perhaps the same commitee which is reviewing the dropping of charges against the fugitive former PM should also investigate the AG's actions.

  • Like 1
Posted

If the "evidence" in the case mentioned in the OP doesn't stick, maybe the Attorney General should have a look at Dear Leaders War on drugs, the Tak Bai "incident" or the Krung Se killings.

Sure there are no statute of limitations for massmurder??

attachicon.giftakbai.jpg

The public calls it massmurder but Thaksin and his cronies will call it political and therefor they will receive amnesty.

Yep, put them together and it is political mass murder- truly what he did.

Posted

I was just wondering how many AG's decisions to not indict Thaksin will it take till many people here to accept it and get over it?

and would the same attitude extend to any decision by any AG to the dem's leader and his deputy for their roll in the 2010 riots?hit-the-fan.gif.pagespeed.ce.6UelFDbFNJ.

Posted

What, review the decision if they find new evidence to prove that Thaksin wasn't actually out the country on the run, so he can be indicted all the same.

What a joke, these agencies have become so utterly biased they make the coup govt look like angels.

Posted

so when Taksin is expected to be welcome in Thailand ?

If he comes back today there will be the biggest punch up nationwide like you have never before witnessed .

Posted

If a culprit flees the country after a court judgement, the court is in charge of issuing an arrest warrant, while the National Police Bureau and the Foreign Ministry are responsible for bringing him back to the country, he said. (MCOT online news)

-- So that means multiple agencies didn't do their jobs?

You sound surprised.

Posted

Might well be that the new A.G. is trying to up the ante along with bigger lunch boxes to be provided in long court cases in this matter. whistling.gif

Posted

If the "evidence" in the case mentioned in the OP doesn't stick, maybe the Attorney General should have a look at Dear Leaders War on drugs, the Tak Bai "incident" or the Krung Se killings.

Sure there are no statute of limitations for massmurder??

attachicon.giftakbai.jpg

carefully with the word massmurder....I got suspended for calling Thaksin a massmurder......

Posted

Might well be that the new A.G. is trying to up the ante along with bigger lunch boxes to be provided in long court cases in this matter. whistling.gif

pastry box it was.....

Posted

If the "evidence" in the case mentioned in the OP doesn't stick, maybe the Attorney General should have a look at Dear Leaders War on drugs, the Tak Bai "incident" or the Krung Se killings.

Sure there are no statute of limitations for massmurder??

attachicon.giftakbai.jpg

carefully with the word massmurder....I got suspended for calling Thaksin a massmurder......

You probably got suspended for using massmurder as opposed to mass murderer?wink.png

Posted

I am wondering if the new AG might have a political bias, rather than being unbiased, first he decides to drop the terrorism charges against Thaksin and the decides to charge Abhisit and Suthep. If there is sufficient evidence to warrent the dropping of charges against a furgitive who is on the run, then fine, and if there is sufficient evidence to indict someone who was carrying out thier duty against an armed mob that had terrorised the populace, invaded a hospital and set fire to at least one building in the commercial heart of the city causing disruption to the livelihoods of a large number of retailers, then go ahead. If however, the AG is acting with political bias, then perhaps the same commitee which is reviewing the dropping of charges against the fugitive former PM should also investigate the AG's actions.

Wrong, completely wrong. This AG did not drop the terrorism charges against Thaksin. That was done in October by the previous AG, the one appointed by abhisit.

The new AG has decided to send the murder charges against abhisit and suthep to the courts.

The new AG is now apparently thinking about repealing the decision of his predecessor and reinstating the charge of terrorism against Thaksin.

Hardly the actions of a man "bought" by Thaksin, one would have thought.

Posted

so when Taksin is expected to be welcome in Thailand ?

Don't hold your breath. There is still a very major obstacle to his return. Think about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...