Jump to content

Thai Health minister and his top man must go, RDS says


webfact

Recommended Posts

Health minister and his top man must go, RDS says
PUANGCHOMPOO PRASERT
THE NATION

BANGKOK: -- THE RURAL Doctors Society presented proposals yesterday for reforming the Public Health Ministry and called for caretaker minister Pradit Sinthawanarong and permanent secretary Narong Sahamethapat to step down.

Dr Arak Wongworachart, director of Nakhon Si Thammarat's Sichol Hospital and a representative of the RDS, said the group wants a neutral person to be caretaker because the two men no longer had the legitimacy to carry out ministry policies after allegedly intervening in the public health system and ruining it.

He said a neutral person should take the lead in overhauling the health and political systems.

The government should enhance service and work efficiency, which would boost the confidence of service users; prevent political intervention in state officials' work; and overhaul independent organisations such as state-owned enterprises, including the Government Pharmaceutical Organisation, to ensure people participation.

The Education Ministry's teaching methods should also be revamped to reduce rote learning and studying for exams. And the National Police decentralised to local areas.

As for the controversial pay-for-performance-based salary system for health personnel, the doctors would no longer carp about it because they believe this issue stemmed from the two men, Pradit and Narong, so they just wanted the pair to resign.

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-12-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess rural doctors aren't voting PTP. Now someone will tell me that is because they are educated and middle class.

No, I won't. Incompetance should not be rewarded.

The implied story is that PT has lost a lot of ground politically. Ok. Wait until the election, put forth manageable policies and reforms. Have amore balanced MP duistribution from winning more elible voters, and hash out cahnges that compromise with benefits and liabilities for both sides.

Neither side wants that.

My God, sharing power would be anarchy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...