Jump to content

EC approves borrowing to maintain Thai rice pledging


webfact

Recommended Posts

EC approves borrowing to maintain rice pledging
The Nation

BANGKOK: -- The Public Debt Management Office will soon borrow Bt38 billion to keep the rice-pledging scheme afloat after the Election Commission approved the additional funding as for an ongoing project.

Suwit Rojanavich, deputy director-general of the office, said yesterday that it had received Bt75 billion in proceeds from issuing bonds and could earn Bt37 billion. The amount of borrowing would be controlled under the pledging-project budget set at Bt410 billion.

Loans for other projects under state-owned enterprises could be deferred during the caretaker government's term. Delaying the Bt350-billion water-management and Bt2-trillion infrastructure-development projects should help reduce the ratio of public debt to gross domestic product by 2-3 percentage points.

The EC also approved the Finance Ministry’s plan to extend the diesel excise tax waiver to end-January.

It would be up to the new government whether this would be extended when the new deadline comes.

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2013-12-25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has to be a Guinness record for stupidity - borrowing money to prop up a scam on the point of collapse and which has already lost billions. What happened to the "expedited rice sales" to raise the necessary finance?

make up your mind please. either the rice was paid for and losses were already incurred or the rice is paid now causing losses. no such thing like "additional losses".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone please explain to me why the election commission has any authority whatsoever over the rice pledging scheme?

It doesn't. However, since an election has been called if the government wants to raise cash (or do anything that would impact the next government) it must get the approval of the electoral commission.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has to be a Guinness record for stupidity - borrowing money to prop up a scam on the point of collapse and which has already lost billions. What happened to the "expedited rice sales" to raise the necessary finance?

make up your mind please. either the rice was paid for and losses were already incurred or the rice is paid now causing losses. no such thing like "additional losses".

Maybe he had in mind the losses they made on the previous harvests they pledged, and the additional loss that will occur on the this seasons harvest which hadn't been paid for yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has to be a Guinness record for stupidity - borrowing money to prop up a scam on the point of collapse and which has already lost billions. What happened to the "expedited rice sales" to raise the necessary finance?

make up your mind please. either the rice was paid for and losses were already incurred or the rice is paid now causing losses. no such thing like "additional losses".

Could you rephrase into something understandable? Where did I mention "additional losses" which will certainly occur if rice is continued to be purchased at above real value?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that the key phrase, in this announcement from the PDMO, is "will soon borrow", suggesting that they still don't actually have the cash to pass to the BAAC to pass-on to the patient farmers.

So not much change from a month ago, then. wink.png

Yay for Red Finance & 'White-Lies' ! facepalm.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whistling.gif Pardon me for being ignorant ...... bur why and when does the Election Commission have the right or authority to approve such borrowing for that purpose?

For election expenses ..... such as the Feb 2nd election .... o.k. maybe.

But they should NOT be allowed to borrow money for the Rice pledging program.

That's NOT their area and they should (I think) have no authority there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EC approving massive loans ?? This makes about as much sense as the dog catching department

starting to approve loans. The EC should be spending more time figuring out how to have elections

that are not bought and paid for by 500 baht notes...

I agree with the poster that said Amazing Thailand be changed to <deleted> Thailand .....

Edited by EyesWideOpen
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone please explain to me why the election commission has any authority whatsoever over the rice pledging scheme?

Seems utterly bizarre, doesn't it. I thought election commissions dealt with registering candidates, making sure nobody violated campaign funding laws and adhered to political electioneering laws. Afterwards, they certify elections and monitor appointments. Why the heck are they involved in borrowing money (and raising tax obligations) and running government programs. Here, it seems like anybody in a government building can start declaring whatever they want and make it official policy. This is anarchy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's my rubber fertiliser subsidy?

All the rubber growers are in the south so by default must be Dem supporters so ipso facto the government doesn't give a rats ass about you. Meanwhile the PT crooks voters are the farmers in the north whom they are bending over backwards trying to borrow money to pay them in order to secure their votes again in a month and a bit after which they can go and screw themselves too I am sure...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredible. With a stroke of a pen, Phue Thai has just bought the election. 38 billion baht - to ensure the northern vote. The continuation of a ruinous policy that increases the debt of the country exponentially each year, increases its burden on the GDP, and has thrown Thailand off its once held position as the world's top exporter of rice. Where's the transparency behind the EC's decision ? Why was this not aired before the public ? Why was this done behind closed doors ? What influences were exerted on the process ? 38 billion baht. Enacted behind closed doors. It's beyond words.

Whatever the merits or demerits of the government policy, it certainly does not increase the debt of the country exponentially each year (except in the trivial sense that any increase or decrease can be represented a fractional exponent). A mathematician names Johh Paulos coined the word "innumeracy" as an analog to "illiteracy". It seems to apply in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one knows how long this power struggle is still going on.
Would that then mean in inverse conclusion,
that the EC will in the future all the money burning schemes approve, receives state loans and funds release?
Who controls it? Who signs against?
“Hey we need 38 billion Baht (38.000.000.000) quick quick, please sign here and here, thanks.”
Today is Christmas, isn´t?
Edited by tomacht8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredible. With a stroke of a pen, Phue Thai has just bought the election. 38 billion baht - to ensure the northern vote. The continuation of a ruinous policy that increases the debt of the country exponentially each year, increases its burden on the GDP, and has thrown Thailand off its once held position as the world's top exporter of rice. Where's the transparency behind the EC's decision ? Why was this not aired before the public ? Why was this done behind closed doors ? What influences were exerted on the process ? 38 billion baht. Enacted behind closed doors. It's beyond words.

Whatever the merits or demerits of the government policy, it certainly does not increase the debt of the country exponentially each year (except in the trivial sense that any increase or decrease can be represented a fractional exponent). A mathematician names Johh Paulos coined the word "innumeracy" as an analog to "illiteracy". It seems to apply in this case.

While I am unable to supply the equation involved, that the cost of the scheme increases each year due to the ever increasing amount in storage, its storage costs and degradation, and buyers unwillingness to purchase old rice, may well be a non-linear function of the stock held each year.

But there is little argument that costs are not increasing rapidly, and the whole mess is unsustainable.

As of 2012, the thai national debt was about 169 billion dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...