Jump to content

Constitution Court opens first hearing of 2-trillion baht loan bill


Recommended Posts

Posted

Constitution Court opens first hearing of 2-trillion baht loan bill

139026-imagejpeg-205157-wpcf_728x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The Constitution Court today opened the first hearing of the 2-trillion baht loan bill to rule whether it is against the Constitution.

The controversial loan bill was forwarded to the court for ruling by the former Parliament president Somsak Kiartsuranont if any section of the bill is against Section 169 Paragraph 1, and Section 170 of the Constitution.

Former opposition leader Abhisit Vejjajiva questioned its legitimacy as the bill allows the Finance Ministry to seek a huge loan to finance mega transport infrastructure notably the high-speed rail project but without any details.

Mr Abhisit and government defenders of the loan bill will appear at the court to testify at the hearing.

The bill passed final approval by the Senate at 02.30 a.m. on November 20 with a vote of 63 to 13.

It earlier passed the House of Representatives with a vote of 287 to 105 on September 21.

But the bill was stalled pending the ruling by the Constitution Court after the opposition leader sought court’s ruling before it becomes effective.

The loan bill came under attack by the opposition party with claim that it would provide huge fiscal burdens for future generations with and estimated additional 3 trillion baht in interest over the course of 50 years. The burden of paying off this massive loan rests on the current and future taxpayers, children and their grandchildren.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/constitution-court-opens-first-hearing-2-trillion-baht-loan-bill/

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2014-01-08

Posted
The bill passed final approval by the Senate at 02.30 a.m. on November 20 with a vote of 63 to 13.

Would it have passed if the rest of the Senate members who were told to go home had been there?

Posted

In a democratic country, government do investments to benefit the people, even if people need to pay tax , they are still using the facilities that the government built or invest in. Who the hell will take a train costing you 2000+ baht per trip?

  • Like 2
Posted

In a democratic country, government do investments to benefit the people, even if people need to pay tax , they are still using the facilities that the government built or invest in. Who the hell will take a train costing you 2000+ baht per trip?

Who needs a new hight-speed train?

They should invest in bringing the existing train lines up to date. That might make sense.

  • Like 2
Posted
The bill passed final approval by the Senate at 02.30 a.m. on November 20 with a vote of 63 to 13.

Would it have passed if the rest of the Senate members who were told to go home had been there?

That is the million dollar question my friend.

Clearly, PTP didn't think so which is why they cheated many senators out of their right to votes. Standard PTP behavior. Simply lie.

  • Like 1
Posted
Hopefully the court judges with a variety of parliamentary requirements to be met in the future, no matter who is in power at the moment.
Like for all future budgeting processes they make it compulsory for all future governments, that
- the use of money for project proposals are accurately represented in detail and coherent on the last baht.
- the use of money for project proposals is described in detail for all people publicly documented and visible
- Public monthly or quarterly reports on Finance and project progresses.
- Public invitation for project proposals and at least three competitive compare offers.
- Project completion reports including all expenses with receipts.
- a strong supervisory committee composed of members is formed by all parties,
to control the entire investment process without disabilities and time delay restrictions.
The results of the process and progress checks are presented to the parliament.
The members of the supervisory body should rotate so that corruption is impossible or more difficult.
When public funds are used, then the public has the right to see what the representatives of the people plan to do with the money and how it was used.
It must be prevented that a country can be completely plundered by a few unethical people just because they are currently in power.

Democracy requires transparency and not dubious vote in the middle of the night for the largest credit since the existing of Thailand,

with a term of 50 years. In fact, affected at least three generations in a row.

With compound interest, it is then 6 trillion baht.

This government has no ethics and no morals to society.

Right, this and former governments has no ethics to society , and will never have, as it is in the Thai culture....

But the only government that really invested in huge infrastructure in Thailand was and is the Taksin governments, airport(s), highway, airport link, sky trains, all what we see and use of high end infrastructure, so hopeful also high speed rail system.

During the years of undemocratic government with Abhisit as PM, nothing was build up, only debts.

Let's wait to what the court comes up with, maybe there is a good financial plan and the payback of the loan could be done by income from the investments, so not to quickly with calculating for tax payers in generations.

“Right, this and former governments has no ethics to society”
I agree
To lament the past, who built which road, is interesting for historians, but helps now little.
Much more important is what is happening today and in the future.
The bill for the loan was exactly 4 pages long. Without reasonable load testing and

without accurate conceptual content and without a projection is such a loan application itself unconstitutional and not only the circumstances!

There are far more important things you can do with that money, for example,

Schools and hospitals modernize, to ensure drinking water supply, repair roads and environmental protection.

The state money should benefit all Thais equally and not only a few.
  • Like 2
Posted

Hopefully the court judges with a variety of parliamentary requirements to be met in the future, no matter who is in power at the moment.

Like for all future budgeting processes they make it compulsory for all future governments, that

- the use of money for project proposals are accurately represented in detail and coherent on the last baht.

- the use of money for project proposals is described in detail for all people publicly documented and visible

- Public monthly or quarterly reports on Finance and project progresses.

- Public invitation for project proposals and at least three competitive compare offers.

- Project completion reports including all expenses with receipts.

- a strong supervisory committee composed of members is formed by all parties,

to control the entire investment process without disabilities and time delay restrictions.

The results of the process and progress checks are presented to the parliament.

The members of the supervisory body should rotate so that corruption is impossible or more difficult.

When public funds are used, then the public has the right to see what the representatives of the people plan to do with the money and how it was used.

It must be prevented that a country can be completely plundered by a few unethical people just because they are currently in power.

Democracy requires transparency and not dubious vote in the middle of the night for the largest credit since the existing of Thailand,

with a term of 50 years. In fact, affected at least three generations in a row.

With compound interest, it is then 6 trillion baht.

This government has no ethics and no morals to society.

Right, this and former governments has no ethics to society , and will never have, as it is in the Thai culture....

But the only government that really invested in huge infrastructure in Thailand was and is the Taksin governments, airport(s), highway, airport link, sky trains, all what we see and use of high end infrastructure, so hopeful also high speed rail system.

During the years of undemocratic government with Abhisit as PM, nothing was build up, only debts.

Let's wait to what the court comes up with, maybe there is a good financial plan and the payback of the loan could be done by income from the investments, so not to quickly with calculating for tax payers in generations.

Airport has been on the cards long before Thaksin and did you know one of the runways was substandard when it opened,corruption. not enough toilets were built when it opened,crruption. highways, I seem to recall plenty of highways before Thaksin, same with sky train planning well down the track,airport link, hmm, most international airports have links, but does the link actually go to the Terminals?
Posted

They couldn't nail Yingluck with the amnesty one, perhaps this'll stick. There's still the rice scheme and many more to go through, I suppose the problem is Y was so often absent, she actually had very little to do with any governing blink.png

Posted

Funny, isn't it.

All this hokus pokus about the Thaksin family, and we have right under our noses yet another scheme to fill the coffers of all the crooked politicians and their acolytes.

This seems to almost be a weekly event. Have these people ever really done anything in the last 10 years from all of those trillions and trillions in grants, loans, schemes, etc?

No! I think this Thaksin thing is simply a ruse to get keep people distracted.

Posted

"We need it because have no money to pay the Farmers, no money to buy tablets, no money to buy votes, no money for an election campaign...and no money for shopping"

Also, no money for Thai Airways.

Posted

Can somebody clarify if the Bank of Thailand (= Central Bank) has an influence in such mega loans?

I believe that the Bank of Thailand performed well since its existence but I never understood who controls this central bank: one can find the name of the Governor...but who are the others?

Posted

Sheer lunacy to not have oversight and transparency on a project by project basis in a country were both

major parties are corrupt and the only thing keeping the corruption cost to 30% is the feeble level of

oversight and transparency that currently exists. This borrowing bill could be what puts Thailand in the

sub Saharan Africa category of corruption. bah.gif

  • Like 1
Posted
Hopefully the court judges with a variety of parliamentary requirements to be met in the future, no matter who is in power at the moment.
Like for all future budgeting processes they make it compulsory for all future governments, that
- the use of money for project proposals are accurately represented in detail and coherent on the last baht.
- the use of money for project proposals is described in detail for all people publicly documented and visible
- Public monthly or quarterly reports on Finance and project progresses.
- Public invitation for project proposals and at least three competitive compare offers.
- Project completion reports including all expenses with receipts.
- a strong supervisory committee composed of members is formed by all parties,
to control the entire investment process without disabilities and time delay restrictions.
The results of the process and progress checks are presented to the parliament.
The members of the supervisory body should rotate so that corruption is impossible or more difficult.
When public funds are used, then the public has the right to see what the representatives of the people plan to do with the money and how it was used.
It must be prevented that a country can be completely plundered by a few unethical people just because they are currently in power.

Democracy requires transparency and not dubious vote in the middle of the night for the largest credit since the existing of Thailand,

with a term of 50 years. In fact, affected at least three generations in a row.

With compound interest, it is then 6 trillion baht.

This government has no ethics and no morals to society.

Right, this and former governments has no ethics to society , and will never have, as it is in the Thai culture....

But the only government that really invested in huge infrastructure in Thailand was and is the Taksin governments, airport(s), highway, airport link, sky trains, all what we see and use of high end infrastructure, so hopeful also high speed rail system.

During the years of undemocratic government with Abhisit as PM, nothing was build up, only debts.

Let's wait to what the court comes up with, maybe there is a good financial plan and the payback of the loan could be done by income from the investments, so not to quickly with calculating for tax payers in generations.

During the years of undemocratic government with Abhisit as PM, nothing was build up, only debts.

I don't think you have been paying close attention to what the PTP has been doing to the country in recent times.

The debts they plan to rack up will make the rice scam and all their other fiscal disasters look puny, and our grandchildren will be still be paying it off long after we are gone.

Your inane and one-eyed view of things is not going to make the PTP sins go away, so stop the bs !

  • Like 1
Posted

I hope they are able to derail this bill.

If you want to invest in infrastructure that is good, but make good plans and make sure there is accountability. Doing it off the books only invites even more graft and the PTP is corrupt enough as it is.

Everyone knows that this loan was also to support the rice scam.

I have no problems with investments if opponents are allowed to check the spending.. not like this.

You know, they're still paying off the debt created during the 1997 crash. <deleted> are they thinking about by taking on another 2T ฿ in additional debt? The only upside I see is that the baht will be debased faster against the dollar (euro, pound, etc), well, at least for awhile. Any actual infrastructure repairs will be cosmetic or politically motivated while making the amart richer in the process. How about limited access (clover-leaf onramps and offramps) super-highways spanning North to South and East to West with funds set aside for the purchase of highway patrol cars and Westernize police training for traffic control and the enforcement of moving violations. That might actually save a few lives. Wait a minute! I lost my mind...it's about the money. Never mind.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...