Why are there so many negative Farang in Thailand?
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
1,593
Updates and events in the War in Ukraine 2025
Maybe he's helping top up his pension. Macgregor needs the clicks. -
23
-
1,593
Updates and events in the War in Ukraine 2025
Spell Arrse correctly. Predictably, you have spent your time trying to prove how terrible Ukraine is, and zero time showing far higher Russian resistance to conscription, because basically you are a Tankie. Go ask Arrse what that means. I post on there. You are an ignorant man. You make a statement Cherry picked to belittle the Ukrainian military, because you think it shows the Ukrainian military in a bad light. Your mates in green will verify this; in WW2, the British army varied between about 900,000 and 3 million men, but of those, only about 20% at any one time were on the front line. In June 1944, the British Army in the U K was about 1.5 million men. A further half million were in the Middle East, Africa, Asia. In June 1944, 156,000 British troops hit the beaches in Normandy. So what's your explanation why only 10% were sent over? Its also why the entire Russian army isn't in Ukraine. Russia is a bigger county, with a bigger population. But it also has more borders to defend. It borders several NATO members. It borders Japan. It borders China, who recently has been making claims to parts of far eastern Russia, recently occupying some Russian islands. The answer is to do with troop rotation, training, logistics. In Iraq, 60% of the Americans deployed were not even in uniform, let alone frontline roles. You provide a plagiarised paragraph in support of the Russians, pointing out how they are willingly volunteering; you nicked the statement from a paywalled Economist article. The statement is unsourced "30,000 per month", versus "27,000 per month" for Ukraine. In both cases, the numbers are before losses. Of course, like all wars, the aggressor (Russia) is suffering higher losses that the defender (Ukraine), thats why typically, when planning an offensive you need a 4:1 to 3:1 advantage. Why are you so intent on discrediting the Ukrainian military, and so obviously championing the Russian military? It is because you are a pro-Russian propagandist, wrapped in the sheen of Chat-GPT. You fail to mention why early in the war Russia felt the need to scour prisons for pressganged convicts. You fail to mention why Russia had to deploy North Korean troops, not Russian troop, to Kursk (its to do with the terms of the Russian military service). You fail to comment on the large numbers of clearly unwilling African and Indian fighters captured by the Ukrainians (totally different from the small numbers of foreign volunteers in the Ukrainian forces). What you deliberately fail to mention, because I know you have read exactly th same OSINT source that I have is that in many cases, Ukrainian troops desert one unit to join a preferred unit. You also deliberately fail to mention the Ukrainian programme to reintegrate men who have gone home, with some success. Ukrainian and Russian desertion rates are roughly in line with American desertion rates related to Vietnam, and similar to what the Soviet Army, even when it was winning, during WW2 (5-10%). You are promoting a pro-Russian ideology which is broadly to over emphasize Ukrainian difficulties, ignore Russian problems and exaggerate Russian successes. Kremlin playbook. You cherry pick sources that support your bias, which is broadly anti-Ukrainian, painted in a cloak of respectability. Since when has "conscription" anywhere been anything but "forced". Conscription is by definition, compulsory. I had a Great Uncle who deserted in WW2. he was a Bevin Boy, didn't fancy being down a mine, so went home. Eventually he was caught by the Red Caps and ended up in Court, where he played the system long enough to eventually agree to join the army after VE day. War was over by the time he finished Basic. Earlier, another Great Uncle was dragged out, crying, by the Provosts, after he went AWOL. He went back to the front. Yes, Ukraine has to conscript men. Britain had to as well. Conscription had to come in WW1 because not enough were volunteering. Russian law forbids conscripts with less than 4 months training from being in combat, and forbids service outside of Russia. But the conscripts are often tricked or threatened into signing contracts, which releases them for deployment outside of Russia. But you deliberately fail to mention this, because you are so intent on discrediting the Ukrainian serviceman. https://www.sibreal.org/a/obmanom-zataschili-na-voynu-kak-srochnikov-otpravlyayut-za-lentochku-/33397552.html https://www.rferl.org/a/russian-conscripts-youth-dying-ukraine-putin/33351828.html https://www.severreal.org/a/my-v-uzhase-voevat-ne-hotim-srochnikam-platyat-po-falshivym-kontraktam/33164620.html https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/russia-s-forced-conscription-in-occupied-ukraine -
91
-
0
UK Starmer Speaks Out on Councils Removing Union Jack Flags
"Patriotism will always be an important thing to him," the PM's official spokesman said as the debate over the flags continues to rage. Sir Keir Starmer’s spokesperson has confirmed that the Prime Minister “absolutely” supports the public display of English and British flags. This statement comes in the wake of considerable public reaction after two local councils in England, Tower Hamlets and Birmingham, ordered the removal of flags from their properties. These flags were part of a patriotic initiative known as Operation Raise the Colours. The Prime Minister's official spokesman addressed the controversy, emphasizing Starmer's enduring pride in being British. He highlighted Starmer's previous comments celebrating national achievements, particularly noting the Lionesses’ recent success in the Euros as a point of national pride. "Patriotism will always be significant to him," the spokesperson reiterated, stressing the importance of celebrating British identity through symbolic gestures such as flag displays. The backlash began when Tower Hamlets Council in east London and Birmingham City Council removed the flags, sparking debate. These actions were taken under the councils' directives, with Birmingham citing safety concerns. "Unauthorized items on lampposts could pose a risk to public safety," stated a Birmingham Council representative. Similarly, Tower Hamlets Council mentioned their commitment to maintaining council infrastructure, noting that the flags were attached without the necessary permissions. Despite these justifications, the removals have led to political debate. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick openly criticized Tower Hamlets, accusing the council, led by the pro-Gaza Aspire Party, of demonstrating a "two-tier bias." He pointed out that Palestinian flags, put up following the start of the Israel-Hamas conflict, were not removed promptly, suggesting an inconsistency in the treatment of different flags based on their symbolism. "This absurd national self-loathing must end," Jenrick insisted. "We need to be one country united under the Union flag." His comments reflect a broader sentiment among those who view the removal of British flags as a failure to embrace national solidarity and pride. The situation has ignited a wider discussion about national pride, the meaning of flag symbolism, and the criteria used to determine which flags can be displayed publicly. Questions have arisen over what constitutes a safety hazard and why certain flags are allowed to remain while others, representing national identity, are taken down. The uproar has stretched beyond the councils' decisions and into the larger political arena, prompting reflections on how patriotism is expressed and perceived in the UK. The debate underscores a growing tension between national identity and multicultural representation within public spaces. Amidst the ongoing controversy, it’s clear that such actions resonate deeply with the public's feelings about national pride and identity. As councils navigate the complexities of these decisions, the dialogue surrounding patriotism and its representation continues to evolve, challenging leaders to balance local governance with wider national sentiments. This debate is likely to persist as communities and leaders work toward policies that reflect diverse views while maintaining respect for national symbols. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Exoress 2025-08-19 -
0
Middle East Hamas accepts proposal for Gaza ceasefire, release of hostages
Deal would include 60-day halt to violence and exchange of half of living Israeli hostages for Palestinian prisoners Hamas Agrees to Gaza Ceasefire Proposal Amid Intense Diplomacy In a significant development, Hamas has agreed to a ceasefire proposal that includes the release of half of the remaining Israeli hostages in Gaza. This comes amidst reports from Gaza health officials that 62,000 Palestinians have died in the ongoing 22-month conflict. The ceasefire proposal emerged after negotiations with Egyptian and Qatari officials in Cairo. It follows massive protests in Israel, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faced criticism for his handling of the war and failure to secure a hostage release. Netanyahu labeled the protests as detrimental, arguing they bolster Hamas's position in negotiations. Under the agreed terms, there will be a 60-day suspension of military operations, potentially paving the way for a comprehensive resolution. During this period, a swap of Palestinian prisoners for half of the Israeli hostages in Gaza is expected. Egypt has been a key mediator in the talks between Hamas and Israel, especially as Israel threatens a significant military offensive to capture Gaza City, a move that could displace thousands of Palestinians. While the ceasefire proposal awaits presentation to Israel, Netanyahu insists on full hostage releases, disarmament of Hamas, and Gaza's demilitarization before ending the war. The latest negotiations, influenced by a US-proposed framework, seem to address some of Israel's objections. However, Netanyahu faces growing internal criticism from senior security officials who warn that new offensives could endanger hostages' lives. The plan to capture Gaza City has stirred international concern over the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, where blockades have led to accusations of genocide. As negotiations continue in Egypt, involving significant figures like the Qatari Prime Minister and Egypt's intelligence chief, pressure mounts for an effective resolution. While US President Donald Trump backed Netanyahu's approach against Hamas, mass protests in Israel indicate increasing discontent with the ongoing war and missed opportunities for securing a hostage deal. Over 400,000 people participated in these protests, reflecting growing fatigue with the conflict. Netanyahu accused protesters of inadvertently aiding Hamas, stating, “Those advocating for the war's end without Hamas's defeat only strengthen Hamas and delay hostages' release.” Protesters carried signs referencing the death of Hersh Goldberg-Polin, a dual US-Israeli citizen killed last October alongside other hostages during an Israeli operation. In response, the Hostages and Missing Families Forum criticized Netanyahu, emphasizing hostages' prolonged suffering under his leadership. Yair Golan, an opposition figure, accused Netanyahu of empowering Hamas through previous financial support and failing to eliminate its leaders before the deadly October 7 attack. Amid the potential for an Israeli ground assault, thousands of Palestinians have fled heavy bombardments in eastern Gaza City, seeking refuge in safer areas. While tensions remain high, the ceasefire proposal offers a glimmer of hope. However, the path to long-lasting peace is fraught with complexities. The ceasefire agreement, if successful, could pivot the region towards stability, but it requires careful navigation of political landscapes and international diplomacy. The current atmosphere is charged, with all eyes on whether this development can transition from a temporary lull into enduring peace. Israel and Hamas remain under significant scrutiny to honor the commitments made in this proposal, aiming finally to halt a conflict that has caused immense human suffering. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether these agreements can evolve into tangible outcomes that end violence and restore peace. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Guardian 2025-08-19
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now