scorecard Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> The rotten, spoiled, burned, missing rice stock, if this program was above board, would be a god send to the government. They would be reinbursed for the rice at their cost. Of course this would be dependent upon the government requiring storage warehouse bonding/insuranse for those they are paying to store and safeguard the rice. I have found that the company names on the latest storage of rotten rice seem to be unknown on google. They are noted as mills, and seem to operate under names that are known to the public, but virtually no real info. There are reported to be 2900 of these storage facilities, whose task to inspect same, was deligated to the Attorney General office. (I am sure they have the personal and expertise) to handle this assignment.????? The RTP via the present caretaker Labor Minister were given additional budget of 150 million to ensure all was above board and of course the additional remote camera/monitors budget was another taxpayer expense. The number of people involved in the corruption of this program, may make the 300 plus MP's who were caught red handed fiddling the system, look like the tip of the iceberg. There may be a real chance to clean up the corrupt political system, ban, jail, take restitution, from the lot of them and those remaining would not number enough to make a football team. Yeah the paymasters get real rich real quick club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JRSoul Posted March 1, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2014 The shake-out of the rice industry is now beginning, and it is going to be painful for many. Even the reasonably efficient farmers with larger crop areas will struggle in this market; less efficient will have to switch to other crops, abandon farming and sell up, or learn the hard way when a year's work returns a minimal profit or a loss. If just a small portion of the money lost in the rice scam had been used to induce farmers away from rice farming this pain could have been reduced. Instead an economically insane policy has caused more to switch to the crop and others to invest heavily on new equipment, all in the aim of buying their votes. Well that worked once, but after what for many will be the worst year of the life for earning, there is little hope of voter loyalty IMHO. Well Mick in the shake out the middlemen will still maintain their margin, there will be more migration to the cities, but the rural economy has grown, where rural areas have prospered farmers enthusiastically take up available alternative income opportunities created by the recent boost in the rural economy, these second jobs sit alongside the rice farm and assist in payment for machinery, secondary work necessitates the requirement to spend less time on the crops thus the production cost rises through machinery purchase or hire to free up available time, but the rice crop becomes secondary income There will be incentives from future governments because they will not survive without supporting a now strong rural economy. However a non elected peoples council would have no worry about voters, The concern will be if the rural growth is allowed to slow, the opportunity for second jobs declines, and a future government, or peoples coucil leaves the small farmer to rot, at least PTP only have rotting rice, and angry tax payer, but a strong rural economy! Many farmers have moved on and diversified I doubt this is known, or acknowledged, by those who are not closely involved but continue to spout on this forum Voter loyalty? well you think the farmer is going to recall the 25% increase in the end price, and who delivered, I do Mick, especially now when the end price has plummeted, strange how many on these boards cannot even decipher human nature and the traits that lie within. I didn't notice a massive walk out by government employees refusing to their allocated wage increase as it may be considered vote buying! How long did they protest about the increase? I think wind farming may be the next big thing..(Tvisa posters may offer valuable assistance here)...income for farmers, government subsidy for sure, opportunity for investors, big return for the country vs nuclear power.......has it all.....and farmers can grow a little subsistence crops alongside So you got paid your pledge money? You fail to mention that your strong rural economy has just swallowed B800 billion of taxpayers money, and don't want to admit large chunks of your favourite party are likely to face jail for negligence and corruption, a change from arson and terrorism. Your hopes that rural or government workers will forget about the crimes of this government are simply a wank (you know yourself too well and far too often). BTW you seem to know as much about electricity generation as you do economics, and still hold out your grubby little hand for more subsidy. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Instead of speaking of "low" prices, one should call it "normal" prices. Just take a look at the surrounding countries who deliver the same quality at half the (high) Thai price. Get realistic... Well then the inevitability is that a massive amount of farmers either get out of rice , or live in basic poverty. So what to do. Discuss..mm 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Robby nz Posted March 1, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2014 The shake-out of the rice industry is now beginning, and it is going to be painful for many. Even the reasonably efficient farmers with larger crop areas will struggle in this market; less efficient will have to switch to other crops, abandon farming and sell up, or learn the hard way when a year's work returns a minimal profit or a loss. If just a small portion of the money lost in the rice scam had been used to induce farmers away from rice farming this pain could have been reduced. Instead an economically insane policy has caused more to switch to the crop and others to invest heavily on new equipment, all in the aim of buying their votes. Well that worked once, but after what for many will be the worst year of the life for earning, there is little hope of voter loyalty IMHO. Well Mick in the shake out the middlemen will still maintain their margin, there will be more migration to the cities, but the rural economy has grown, where rural areas have prospered farmers enthusiastically take up available alternative income opportunities created by the recent boost in the rural economy, these second jobs sit alongside the rice farm and assist in payment for machinery, secondary work necessitates the requirement to spend less time on the crops thus the production cost rises through machinery purchase or hire to free up available time, but the rice crop becomes secondary income There will be incentives from future governments because they will not survive without supporting a now strong rural economy. However a non elected peoples council would have no worry about voters, The concern will be if the rural growth is allowed to slow, the opportunity for second jobs declines, and a future government, or peoples coucil leaves the small farmer to rot, at least PTP only have rotting rice, and angry tax payer, but a strong rural economy! Many farmers have moved on and diversified I doubt this is known, or acknowledged, by those who are not closely involved but continue to spout on this forum Voter loyalty? well you think the farmer is going to recall the 25% increase in the end price, and who delivered, I do Mick, especially now when the end price has plummeted, strange how many on these boards cannot even decipher human nature and the traits that lie within. I didn't notice a massive walk out by government employees refusing to their allocated wage increase as it may be considered vote buying! How long did they protest about the increase? I think wind farming may be the next big thing..(Tvisa posters may offer valuable assistance here)...income for farmers, government subsidy for sure, opportunity for investors, big return for the country vs nuclear power.......has it all.....and farmers can grow a little subsistence crops alongside I don't see any opportunities for alternate employment in the rural area I live in. There are no industries being built and the the existing ones that bus people in don't want older people. The construction industry employs migrant workers as they can pay them a lower wage. Even if a farmer could get a job in construction it would only be as a low paid laborer as they don't have the skills needed, yes building is a skilled job. Wind farming ? Have you ever seen how the companies that operate wind farms work ? They buy the land and fence it off, yes I have seen it. The farmers would have to sell their land, a one off price and probably a low one, no chance for any income then. Anyway rice paddy would be unsuitable for wind farms as they are not in windy places, go look and you will see that wind farms are in either coastal places or on high ground which get as much wind as possible, or even off shore as in Germany. Alternate crops are a go but it is not as easy as it may sound to someone sitting in an office in the city, There needs to be planning for that as processing facilities are also needed and an oversupply situation can happen if things are not coordinated. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SICHONSTEVE Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Moreover, the price of rice would continue to decrease as the government now holds more than 18 million tonnes in its stockpiles, he claimed. Good work Yingluck! Has your brother given you any ideas as to how the country gets out of this mess? Oddly enough, it's been 'All Quiet On The Middle-Eastern Front', since before the scheme started to fall apart so publicly, several months ago. No doubt there are still fascinating opportunities in the African coal/gold/diamond-industries, to compensate for the reduced-opportunities in grain-futures as world prices fall in the face of over-supply, for the astute businessman ? Meanwhile one hopes that, whatever new government emerges from the political mess, settling the previous-government's overdue-debts & establishing a more-modest/affordable less-corrupt/misguided rice-scheme will be high on their agenda. If only for the sake of the poor rice-farmers. But with such a large overhang, of high-cost government-owned rice-stocks, there will still be plenty of grief to come yet. There was sustainable scheme in operation before this abortion of a scheme - Abhisit's government rice mortgage scheme. The rice farmers even admitted it was good!! If someone convinces you that if you vote for them then you will see riches beyond that they can only dream of, then of course they wanted in. Its a shame that Thaksin is an imbecile that chose to implement a zombie scheme that could never live up to this promise. It is the same with the health scheme - Thaksin introduced the 30 baht health scheme - Abhisit made it FREE and Yingluck brought back Thaksin's 30 baht version (even though it is more cost effective to NOT to have to collect the 30 baht charges). Vote buying policies store up disaster in the future if they are not costed or worked out properly, as they are learning now!!! Yingluck must think her brother is a complete idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dcutman Posted March 1, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2014 The shake-out of the rice industry is now beginning, and it is going to be painful for many. Even the reasonably efficient farmers with larger crop areas will struggle in this market; less efficient will have to switch to other crops, abandon farming and sell up, or learn the hard way when a year's work returns a minimal profit or a loss. If just a small portion of the money lost in the rice scam had been used to induce farmers away from rice farming this pain could have been reduced. Instead an economically insane policy has caused more to switch to the crop and others to invest heavily on new equipment, all in the aim of buying their votes. Well that worked once, but after what for many will be the worst year of the life for earning, there is little hope of voter loyalty IMHO. Well Mick in the shake out the middlemen will still maintain their margin, there will be more migration to the cities, but the rural economy has grown, where rural areas have prospered farmers enthusiastically take up available alternative income opportunities created by the recent boost in the rural economy, these second jobs sit alongside the rice farm and assist in payment for machinery, secondary work necessitates the requirement to spend less time on the crops thus the production cost rises through machinery purchase or hire to free up available time, but the rice crop becomes secondary income There will be incentives from future governments because they will not survive without supporting a now strong rural economy. However a non elected peoples council would have no worry about voters, The concern will be if the rural growth is allowed to slow, the opportunity for second jobs declines, and a future government, or peoples coucil leaves the small farmer to rot, at least PTP only have rotting rice, and angry tax payer, but a strong rural economy! Many farmers have moved on and diversified I doubt this is known, or acknowledged, by those who are not closely involved but continue to spout on this forum Voter loyalty? well you think the farmer is going to recall the 25% increase in the end price, and who delivered, I do Mick, especially now when the end price has plummeted, strange how many on these boards cannot even decipher human nature and the traits that lie within. I didn't notice a massive walk out by government employees refusing to their allocated wage increase as it may be considered vote buying! How long did they protest about the increase? I think wind farming may be the next big thing..(Tvisa posters may offer valuable assistance here)...income for farmers, government subsidy for sure, opportunity for investors, big return for the country vs nuclear power.......has it all.....and farmers can grow a little subsistence crops alongside The small rural farmers have moved on and diversified? Do you ever get tired of spewing? I do believe the damage from this crazy scheme is just now beginning and most likely will hurt the small farmers long in the future. By your condescending posts you are only an economist in your own mind, people with the real economic sense predicted exactly what is going on now, before this govt even took office. Farmers going to build Wind farms? Big income's? please Geo get a grip. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intacome Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Talking rice blues I woke up the other day looked at my rice and said hey. It’s ready to harvest and thought what I should do to get my pay. Well I aint in this bonus scheme so all I get is the market rate. I’m standing there thinking this when along comes a guy and says Hi. Hi says I and he says wait I can get you over the odds it aint no lie. I’m no fool and told him so. But he said no so let’s just go. So we cut the rice then head off to the Millers place. We got there and I’m looking at the farmers. They all standing about waving papers and looking keen. With stamps and seals and other stuff its quite a scene. Well we weigh my rice and then were down the road. We stop where we aint seen and count the money and I get my pay. Its 3 Baht over the market rate so I aint complaining. Before I leave I look back and see the miller counting The guy who cut my rice gets his share. But I don’t care. I can feed my family pay my bills Going back home I see the farmers, what a bunch.. I’ve got my money but you’re gonna feel the crunch. As to the quality of your skills as a “songwriter” – ever considered a career in fruitcarving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intacome Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Hi Thanks for the comment I know its crap ( my names not woody) but I couldn’t be bothered writing some long winded account of another rice scam that no one seems to have mentioned, at least you read it. I recon the miller would have made about 40000 by claiming our rice under the scheme, if this a common practice the millers are making money hand over fist and the government is getting screwed. As far as fruit carving I tried that and I was lucky to come away with all my fingers, I made a point of not shaking the millers hand because I have problems counting up to eight. Another scam I heard is that some farmers have ballast tanks in the trucks that they empty after dumping the rice prior to being weighed on the way out, although I can’t verify it , may be a myth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inzman Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Where have all the red apologists gone to? They seem to have withdrawn to their rooms. This scam was always going to end badly, I keep thinking the devil in Dubai must have known that, and he is very calculating. I cant help but wondering what his plan is? He plays the poor farmers like chess pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 6 members of my immediate family supplement their rice farming income with secondary work, one in the booming local construction industry, one in security for a top 3 car sales outlet, one has a wife that runs a shop, another runs a local petrol station and noodle shop - just examples diversification guys all came into being bar one in the last couple of years But do keep letting me know how you feel things ought to be..... And the occasional insult doesn't cut through anymore, I see it for what it is..but if I could suggest a little more originality please...especially from you Mick, you've been around a long time old boy......years in the provision of power industry too, perhaps you could explain to Rob that the machinery to run wind farms can be set on land at an annual rental, you know the same as power poles are on occasion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SICHONSTEVE Posted March 1, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2014 6 members of my immediate family supplement their rice farming income with secondary work, one in the booming local construction industry, one in security for a top 3 car sales outlet, one has a wife that runs a shop, another runs a local petrol station and noodle shop - just examples diversification guys all came into being bar one in the last couple of years But do keep letting me know how you feel things ought to be..... And the occasional insult doesn't cut through anymore, I see it for what it is..but if I could suggest a little more originality please...especially from you Mick, you've been around a long time old boy......years in the provision of power industry too, perhaps you could explain to Rob that the machinery to run wind farms can be set on land at an annual rental, you know the same as power poles are on occasion Seems like rice growing is an expensive hobby to them then!!! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 6 members of my immediate family supplement their rice farming income with secondary work, one in the booming local construction industry, one in security for a top 3 car sales outlet, one has a wife that runs a shop, another runs a local petrol station and noodle shop - just examples diversification guys all came into being bar one in the last couple of years But do keep letting me know how you feel things ought to be..... And the occasional insult doesn't cut through anymore, I see it for what it is..but if I could suggest a little more originality please...especially from you Mick, you've been around a long time old boy......years in the provision of power industry too, perhaps you could explain to Rob that the machinery to run wind farms can be set on land at an annual rental, you know the same as power poles are on occasion Seems like rice growing is an expensive hobby to them then!!! Family will always eat and of course when the rice is making a profit they can afford to invest more, or as they have done, diversify, so all their eggs are not in one basket, this is the year to upgrade the rice strain I understand, so they do re-invest, for the most part they grow one crop premium rice, I don't eat a lot of rice but it is good fare, even after being stored for a year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Hi Thanks for the commentI know its crap ( my names not woody) but I couldnt be bothered writing some long winded account of another rice scam that no one seems to have mentioned, at least you read it.I recon the miller would have made about 40000 by claiming our rice under the scheme, if this a common practice the millers are making money hand over fist and the government is getting screwed. As far as fruit carving I tried that and I was lucky to come away with all my fingers, I made a point of not shaking the millers hand because I have problems counting up to eight. Another scam I heard is that some farmers have ballast tanks in the trucks that they empty after dumping the rice prior to being weighed on the way out, although I cant verify it , may be a myth. The only certainty, is that the miller and exporters do very nicely thank you. I used to be an agribusiness exporter, you do ok. Biggest risk is exchange rates. Problem is however, that thai rice isn't as special as they claim. It has some special varieties but a lot of it is generic rice that is in direct competition with the rest of the world. Rice is an odd.commodity because the vast majority isn't traded. It is a commodity with little international trade. 90% is consumed in country so Thailand is an oddity to produce such a surplus. If thailand was just to grow to be self sufficient it would grow half as much. So how is Thailand going to feed farmers if they stop growing? Big potential social upheaval if a lot stop producing. There are 10mn rice farmers. Imagine what is going to happen if they can't export? They might not starve, but they are barely above the bread line, but now the international demand for the.product is lessened. The surest thing is that the middleman ALWAYS gets paid. He just takes the export price and colludes with his mates all the way back to the price to pay the farmer 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SICHONSTEVE Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 6 members of my immediate family supplement their rice farming income with secondary work, one in the booming local construction industry, one in security for a top 3 car sales outlet, one has a wife that runs a shop, another runs a local petrol station and noodle shop - just examples diversification guys all came into being bar one in the last couple of years But do keep letting me know how you feel things ought to be..... And the occasional insult doesn't cut through anymore, I see it for what it is..but if I could suggest a little more originality please...especially from you Mick, you've been around a long time old boy......years in the provision of power industry too, perhaps you could explain to Rob that the machinery to run wind farms can be set on land at an annual rental, you know the same as power poles are on occasion Seems like rice growing is an expensive hobby to them then!!! Family will always eat and of course when the rice is making a profit they can afford to invest more, or as they have done, diversify, so all their eggs are not in one basket, this is the year to upgrade the rice strain I understand, so they do re-invest, for the most part they grow one crop premium rice, I don't eat a lot of rice but it is good fare, even after being stored for a year! Nice to hear a story about a family that is sensible in what it does and seems to make the utmost out of what is available to them - I fear that this might be one of only a few such stories though amongst the millions of farmers who are not so resourceful and have been propelled into a downward spiral which threatens there livelihoods, if not their lives. They made a big mistake in listening to a serial liar and are paying for it now, unfortunately. I hope that they have learned the painful truth now and will cast the Shinawatra's into the wilderness and behind them!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robby nz Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 6 members of my immediate family supplement their rice farming income with secondary work, one in the booming local construction industry, one in security for a top 3 car sales outlet, one has a wife that runs a shop, another runs a local petrol station and noodle shop - just examples diversification guys all came into being bar one in the last couple of years But do keep letting me know how you feel things ought to be..... And the occasional insult doesn't cut through anymore, I see it for what it is..but if I could suggest a little more originality please...especially from you Mick, you've been around a long time old boy......years in the provision of power industry too, perhaps you could explain to Rob that the machinery to run wind farms can be set on land at an annual rental, you know the same as power poles are on occasion Have you actually seen a wind farm or have any idea of how they work, ? as I said I have. I have seen how the companies who run the wind farm buy the farm (in NZ) from the farmer and exclude everyone. The first thing that is needed for a wind farm is wind, there is very little wind in most of the rice growing areas of this country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 6 members of my immediate family supplement their rice farming income with secondary work, one in the booming local construction industry, one in security for a top 3 car sales outlet, one has a wife that runs a shop, another runs a local petrol station and noodle shop - just examples diversification guys all came into being bar one in the last couple of years But do keep letting me know how you feel things ought to be..... And the occasional insult doesn't cut through anymore, I see it for what it is..but if I could suggest a little more originality please...especially from you Mick, you've been around a long time old boy......years in the provision of power industry too, perhaps you could explain to Rob that the machinery to run wind farms can be set on land at an annual rental, you know the same as power poles are on occasion Seems like rice growing is an expensive hobby to them then!!! Family will always eat and of course when the rice is making a profit they can afford to invest more, or as they have done, diversify, so all their eggs are not in one basket, this is the year to upgrade the rice strain I understand, so they do re-invest, for the most part they grow one crop premium rice, I don't eat a lot of rice but it is good fare, even after being stored for a year! Nice to hear a story about a family that is sensible in what it does and seems to make the utmost out of what is available to them - I fear that this might be one of only a few such stories though amongst the millions of farmers who are not so resourceful and have been propelled into a downward spiral which threatens there livelihoods, if not their lives. They made a big mistake in listening to a serial liar and are paying for it now, unfortunately. I hope that they have learned the painful truth now and will cast the Shinawatra's into the wilderness and behind them!!! Some would say the rural community lived in the economic wilderness for tens of years prior to Thaksin, I wonder how many of the guys posting current day have been 'there' in the agricultural heartlands for the last 20 years and can appreciate the improvement that has taken place in the last couple of years when compared to previously, but undoubtedly there has been steady improvement in the living conditions of many of the poor since Thaksin arrived on the scene, call it how you will, the best bet for the Democrats is that the older generation, who lived through the whole experience slowly disappear!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man River Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Instead of speaking of "low" prices, one should call it "normal" prices. Just take a look at the surrounding countries who deliver the same quality at half the (high) Thai price. Get realistic...Well then the inevitability is that a massive amount of farmers either get out of rice , or live in basic poverty.So what to do. Discuss..mm Or increase productivity as some other countries have. They can look at VN for example. Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaiChai Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Government tried to control the world rice market and failed. Learn from your lessons, and focus on supporting the poor and farmers. How? Focus help at the poorest. Help farmers become more efficient and grow crops in demand. Thailand has been too focused on growing rice, and farmers need to learn how to diversify. They should be supported with cheap seeds, training, fertilizers, and finance to allow them to mechanize more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RubbaJohnny Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) Rice Sticky ? Mashed swedes beware of Knut Kracka Do buy shin pad Edited March 1, 2014 by RubbaJohnny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 6 members of my immediate family supplement their rice farming income with secondary work, one in the booming local construction industry, one in security for a top 3 car sales outlet, one has a wife that runs a shop, another runs a local petrol station and noodle shop - just examples diversification guys all came into being bar one in the last couple of years But do keep letting me know how you feel things ought to be..... And the occasional insult doesn't cut through anymore, I see it for what it is..but if I could suggest a little more originality please...especially from you Mick, you've been around a long time old boy......years in the provision of power industry too, perhaps you could explain to Rob that the machinery to run wind farms can be set on land at an annual rental, you know the same as power poles are on occasion Have you actually seen a wind farm or have any idea of how they work, ? as I said I have. I have seen how the companies who run the wind farm buy the farm (in NZ) from the farmer and exclude everyone. The first thing that is needed for a wind farm is wind, there is very little wind in most of the rice growing areas of this country. Strange almost every year I hear the complaints of the rice crop lying flat, caused by wind and rain I understand Apparently it is rumoured there is enough wind in Phetchabun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bigbamboo Posted March 1, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2014 hows your master in Dubai now !...still the demigod you all made him LOL I think you mean demagogue. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Crushdepth Posted March 1, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) Cut out the crocodile tears and the pathetic political posturing guys, remember those calling for the subsidy to be scrapped due to the tax burden, remember those calling for 'market price', well don't pretend to pity the farmers because you now have your visions realised And another small point, if as stated by many on this forum there was no benefit to the farmer from the rice subsidy..........having to accept 'market price' will not make any difference to their income......right guys? Anyway a good time to expand No, the scheme has driven the market price substantially lower.Stockpiling the rice like idiots took a huge chunk of Thai rice out of the export market, giving other countries the incentive to boost their own production, which they did, driving prices down. The subsidy encouraged Thai farmers to pump out the rice too. Now Thailand is trying to re-enter the market by dumping a 10 million tonne stockpile on top of this season's subsidy-boosted crop on top of increased production by major competitors who can also do it cheaper. What's that going to do to the market price and farmers income? Unwinding agricultural subsidies is always painful. This one is probably going to have repercussions for Thailand's rice exports for years to come. And since you raised it, yes taxpayers have grounds to be aggravated about wasting billions on such a stupid, damaging, poorly executed and apparently corruption-riddled policy. There are far better ways to help farmers than this debacle. Edited March 1, 2014 by Crushdepth 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Sure there will be 'better ways' to help the farmer, first of course those in 'power' have to discover the inclination, something that was apparently missing prior to the involvement of Thaksin....there is much criticism but some of the farmers will not easiy forget where they were a few years ago compared to where they are now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Instead of speaking of "low" prices, one should call it "normal" prices. Just take a look at the surrounding countries who deliver the same quality at half the (high) Thai price. Get realistic...Well then the inevitability is that a massive amount of farmers either get out of rice , or live in basic poverty.So what to do. Discuss..mm Or increase productivity as some other countries have. They can look at VN for example. Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand The problem is the average is skewed.. The most desirable and valuable product hom mali has the lowest yield and is grown in the place with no irrigation. How to grow rice when u have no water. The whole industry is a nonsense. Hugely wasteful and produces for most very little and yet we are told it should be something for a rural family but in reality a family growing rice will make little money and have rice to eat. It cannot support the millions it has to. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbamboo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Sure there will be 'better ways' to help the farmer, first of course those in 'power' have to discover the inclination, something that was apparently missing prior to the involvement of Thaksin....there is much criticism but some of the farmers will not easiy forget where they were a few years ago compared to where they are now You mean those hazy days when they were debt free? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmugghc Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Another big problem is that the farmers have become conditioned to want more. They have adjusted away from relying on market prices for their income and have gone into more expensive means to take advantage of the unrealistic price offered. They will now be ready to jump at any offer of assistance by any political party whether it be in the form of subsidies or price guarantees, in other words they are now even more open to vote buying. If there is to be any assistance in the future it should be in a diminishing form with the intention of promoting efficiency to the stage where the farmers can make a profit from market prices. We see from stats that the Thai farmers are not only the least efficient in the region producing less rice per rai than their competitors in other countries but that Thailand also has the highest processing and handling costs. These are the things that really need to be addressed along with quality of product which has also declined. You're right but it's worse. I think farmers of other crops like corn etc wants the same deal. Then rubber plantations, just go on. Populist policies may work for awhile but eventually you'll have to pay and you hit a wall, Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man River Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Instead of speaking of "low" prices, one should call it "normal" prices. Just take a look at the surrounding countries who deliver the same quality at half the (high) Thai price. Get realistic...Well then the inevitability is that a massive amount of farmers either get out of rice , or live in basic poverty.So what to do. Discuss..mm Or increase productivity as some other countries have. They can look at VN for example. Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand The problem is the average is skewed.. The most desirable and valuable product hom mali has the lowest yield and is grown in the place with no irrigation. How to grow rice when u have no water. The whole industry is a nonsense. Hugely wasteful and produces for most very little and yet we are told it should be something for a rural family but in reality a family growing rice will make little money and have rice to eat. It cannot support the millions it has to. I didn't know there wasn't any irrigation for hom mali. Isn't there any way to get water in? Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Sure there will be 'better ways' to help the farmer, first of course those in 'power' have to discover the inclination, something that was apparently missing prior to the involvement of Thaksin....there is much criticism but some of the farmers will not easiy forget where they were a few years ago compared to where they are now You mean those hazy days when they were debt free? I remember the young son of one of my friends asking what he would get for his birthday The reply "You can eat rice" Kind of brough it home at the time, and makes your comment look rather glib Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
473geo Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Another big problem is that the farmers have become conditioned to want more. They have adjusted away from relying on market prices for their income and have gone into more expensive means to take advantage of the unrealistic price offered. They will now be ready to jump at any offer of assistance by any political party whether it be in the form of subsidies or price guarantees, in other words they are now even more open to vote buying. If there is to be any assistance in the future it should be in a diminishing form with the intention of promoting efficiency to the stage where the farmers can make a profit from market prices. We see from stats that the Thai farmers are not only the least efficient in the region producing less rice per rai than their competitors in other countries but that Thailand also has the highest processing and handling costs. These are the things that really need to be addressed along with quality of product which has also declined. You're right but it's worse. I think farmers of other crops like corn etc wants the same deal. Then rubber plantations, just go on. Populist policies may work for awhile but eventually you'll have to pay and you hit a wall, Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app "Then the rubber plantations"? Subsidy doubled in 2013! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 Instead of speaking of "low" prices, one should call it "normal" prices. Just take a look at the surrounding countries who deliver the same quality at half the (high) Thai price. Get realistic...Well then the inevitability is that a massive amount of farmers either get out of rice , or live in basic poverty.So what to do. Discuss..mm Or increase productivity as some other countries have. They can look at VN for example. Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand The problem is the average is skewed.. The most desirable and valuable product hom mali has the lowest yield and is grown in the place with no irrigation. How to grow rice when u have no water. The whole industry is a nonsense. Hugely wasteful and produces for most very little and yet we are told it should be something for a rural family but in reality a family growing rice will make little money and have rice to eat. It cannot support the millions it has to. I didn't know there wasn't any irrigation for hom mali. Isn't there any way to get water in? Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand Just what the farmers can pump in. Very different from the central areas where they have manmade irrigation. Hom Mali is for the most part, one crop per year. Thing is, industry people know this, but NO ONE really explains this to somchai average in bangkok. All they imagine is that a hom Mali farmer is rolling in 3 crops of rice per year. Nothing like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now