webfact Posted March 19, 2014 Author Share Posted March 19, 2014 related CAPO to push on with cases against protest leadersBANGKOK, 19 March 2014 (NNT) – The Center for the Administration of Peace and Order (CAPO) has vowed to proceed with all pending legal actions against core leaders of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) despite the revocation of the emergency decree. Full story: http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/712190-capo-to-push-on-with-cases-against-pdrc-core-leaders/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 the yellows attempted coup is failing fast... wait then arrest them all for seeking to overthrow the elected government hope more companies like PTT Plc. will SUE the PDRC 'leaders' into the ground for business disruption - bankrupt them all - 37m is a good start "attempted coup"? Did I miss something? now, now dear rubl you know that PDRC tried to overthrow a democratically elected government by the following means (my 'Top Ten'): persuading their 'friends' in the Un-Dem party not to contest elections blocking polling stations kidnapping government spokesperson blocking highways taking over government buildings harassing people shopping with whistles calling for a Thai family to be ejected from their native country 'encouraging' the un-biased judiciary to dissolve parliament lie to the people that "it would all be over" on bla bla bla date taking over Lumpini when the demo numbers dropped dramatically and lied to say they were 'helping' businesses by relocating - even the ducks in the duck pond think they are "quackers" lol need I go on? hope not (you'll be pleased to hear) but an 'attempted coup" it was Obviously my fault, my dear binj. I always thought a coup was done by the military BTW in a democracy it is perfectly permissable for a political party to decide not to contest an election. Furthermore then PM Yingluck dissolved the House after her government was faced with ever growing anti-government protests because of the blanket amnesty bill her government tried to push through. It even covered her first to years in government, imagine! Need I go on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diehard60 Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 The actions of these people at the time was deemed illegal. Why should they not have to front a court for their breach of those laws/regulations? The actions of Thaksin, Kitiporn, Jatuporn etc were all deemed illegal at the time too. Why should Thaksin not front a court for his actions instead of running this proxy government? Why does Jatuporn have his terrorism case still ongoing after 4 years? Why is Kitiporn still fronting for PT when he has been convicted and should be in jail right now? I'd be curious to see some data on the % of people within PT/UDD who have actually been convicted of wrongdoing yet are still MP's and compare that to the opposition side. I know the opposition are not squeaky clean either, but the pro-Govt side of things are just taking the piss. What about your belover suthep? he has not even gone to court to answer for the murder of 90 people in 2010. so why should anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diehard60 Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 Sounds like they want amnesty from crimes they committed during the SOE. When they did it, was against the law. yea but they through the amnesty deal out REMEMBER???????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diehard60 Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 the yellows attempted coup is failing fast... wait then arrest them all for seeking to overthrow the elected government hope more companies like PTT Plc. will SUE the PDRC 'leaders' into the ground for business disruption - bankrupt them all - 37m is a good start "attempted coup"? Did I miss something? now, now dear rubl you know that PDRC tried to overthrow a democratically elected government by the following means (my 'Top Ten'): persuading their 'friends' in the Un-Dem party not to contest elections blocking polling stations kidnapping government spokesperson blocking highways taking over government buildings harassing people shopping with whistles calling for a Thai family to be ejected from their native country 'encouraging' the un-biased judiciary to dissolve parliament lie to the people that "it would all be over" on bla bla bla date taking over Lumpini when the demo numbers dropped dramatically and lied to say they were 'helping' businesses by relocating - even the ducks in the duck pond think they are "quackers" lol need I go on? hope not (you'll be pleased to hear) but an 'attempted coup" it was Obviously my fault, my dear binj. I always thought a coup was done by the military BTW in a democracy it is perfectly permissable for a political party to decide not to contest an election. Furthermore then PM Yingluck dissolved the House after her government was faced with ever growing anti-government protests because of the blanket amnesty bill her government tried to push through. It even covered her first to years in government, imagine! Need I go on? And it would have cleared abhisit and suthep but they are too stupid to relize that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatsujin Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 The actions of these people at the time was deemed illegal. Why should they not have to front a court for their breach of those laws/regulations? The actions of Thaksin, Kitiporn, Jatuporn etc were all deemed illegal at the time too. Why should Thaksin not front a court for his actions instead of running this proxy government? Why does Jatuporn have his terrorism case still ongoing after 4 years? Why is Kitiporn still fronting for PT when he has been convicted and should be in jail right now? I'd be curious to see some data on the % of people within PT/UDD who have actually been convicted of wrongdoing yet are still MP's and compare that to the opposition side. I know the opposition are not squeaky clean either, but the pro-Govt side of things are just taking the piss. What about your belover suthep? he has not even gone to court to answer for the murder of 90 people in 2010. so why should anyone else. He's certainly not my beloved. Just because I am anti-PT does not automatically make me love Suthep. Regardless, I agree that Suthep and Anhisit should face the charges, and when they appear the case will go nowhere. Yingluck can join them at the same time. Until then, how about jailing those that have actually been convicted of something such as your PR guy Kitiporn or your beloved Thaksin himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HonestQuietBob Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 the yellows attempted coup is failing fast... wait then arrest them all for seeking to overthrow the elected government hope more companies like PTT Plc. will SUE the PDRC 'leaders' into the ground for business disruption - bankrupt them all - 37m is a good start "attempted coup"? Did I miss something? now, now dear rubl you know that PDRC tried to overthrow a democratically elected government by the following means (my 'Top Ten'): persuading their 'friends' in the Un-Dem party not to contest elections blocking polling stations kidnapping government spokesperson blocking highways taking over government buildings harassing people shopping with whistles calling for a Thai family to be ejected from their native country 'encouraging' the un-biased judiciary to dissolve parliament lie to the people that "it would all be over" on bla bla bla date taking over Lumpini when the demo numbers dropped dramatically and lied to say they were 'helping' businesses by relocating - even the ducks in the duck pond think they are "quackers" lol need I go on? hope not (you'll be pleased to hear) but an 'attempted coup" it was Obviously my fault, my dear binj. I always thought a coup was done by the military BTW in a democracy it is perfectly permissable for a political party to decide not to contest an election. Furthermore then PM Yingluck dissolved the House after her government was faced with ever growing anti-government protests because of the blanket amnesty bill her government tried to push through. It even covered her first to years in government, imagine! Need I go on? COUP: A sudden appropriation of leadership or power; Ever heard of a judicial coup? No military required. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 "attempted coup"? Did I miss something? now, now dear rubl you know that PDRC tried to overthrow a democratically elected government by the following means (my 'Top Ten'): persuading their 'friends' in the Un-Dem party not to contest elections blocking polling stations kidnapping government spokesperson blocking highways taking over government buildings harassing people shopping with whistles calling for a Thai family to be ejected from their native country 'encouraging' the un-biased judiciary to dissolve parliament lie to the people that "it would all be over" on bla bla bla date taking over Lumpini when the demo numbers dropped dramatically and lied to say they were 'helping' businesses by relocating - even the ducks in the duck pond think they are "quackers" lol need I go on? hope not (you'll be pleased to hear) but an 'attempted coup" it was Obviously my fault, my dear binj. I always thought a coup was done by the military BTW in a democracy it is perfectly permissable for a political party to decide not to contest an election. Furthermore then PM Yingluck dissolved the House after her government was faced with ever growing anti-government protests because of the blanket amnesty bill her government tried to push through. It even covered her first to years in government, imagine! Need I go on? And it would have cleared abhisit and suthep but they are too stupid to relize that. A bit of manure there, my dear DH. Obviously you try to obfuscate a wee bit. Now back to the topic of PDRC leaders trying to get out of the various charges the scared government tried to heap on them. Democratically of course, the BS heaping that is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 (edited) now, now dear rubl you know that PDRC tried to overthrow a democratically elected government by the following means (my 'Top Ten'): persuading their 'friends' in the Un-Dem party not to contest elections blocking polling stations kidnapping government spokesperson blocking highways taking over government buildings harassing people shopping with whistles calling for a Thai family to be ejected from their native country 'encouraging' the un-biased judiciary to dissolve parliament lie to the people that "it would all be over" on bla bla bla date taking over Lumpini when the demo numbers dropped dramatically and lied to say they were 'helping' businesses by relocating - even the ducks in the duck pond think they are "quackers" lol need I go on? hope not (you'll be pleased to hear) but an 'attempted coup" it was Obviously my fault, my dear binj. I always thought a coup was done by the military BTW in a democracy it is perfectly permissable for a political party to decide not to contest an election. Furthermore then PM Yingluck dissolved the House after her government was faced with ever growing anti-government protests because of the blanket amnesty bill her government tried to push through. It even covered her first to years in government, imagine! Need I go on? COUP: A sudden appropriation of leadership or power; Ever heard of a judicial coup? No military required. Are we still on the topic of PDRC which some like to confuse with yellows? Anti-government protests which some seem to confuse with "sudden appropriation of leadership or power"? What's next, anti-government protest to be made illegal in new law to be proposed by the "unknown status" government of our dear, mortally wounded Ms. Yingluck? Edited March 19, 2014 by rubl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Deerhunter Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 So beating a man almost to death then binding him up and throwing him into a river to drown is ok now as the SOE has been lifted. Well that is one way to make attempted murder, kidnapping etc socially acceptable. Just don't do it during a SOE outside those times it is acceptable. So I guess he will be calling for an amnesty for the reds and Yingluk also or is this only going to apply to one side. Dont be a lightweight turkey, Mr Titanium Chooka. As another poster said, "You must be taking the piss." I think he meant that even a died-in-the-wool red violence & corruption apologiser like you could not be that obtuse. OBTUSE! Now there's a nice word we should use more often in describing Red Violence And Corruption Deniers as well as RVAC apologisers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
binjalin Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 now, now dear rubl you know that PDRC tried to overthrow a democratically elected government by the following means (my 'Top Ten'): persuading their 'friends' in the Un-Dem party not to contest elections blocking polling stations kidnapping government spokesperson blocking highways taking over government buildings harassing people shopping with whistles calling for a Thai family to be ejected from their native country 'encouraging' the un-biased judiciary to dissolve parliament lie to the people that "it would all be over" on bla bla bla date taking over Lumpini when the demo numbers dropped dramatically and lied to say they were 'helping' businesses by relocating - even the ducks in the duck pond think they are "quackers" lol need I go on? hope not (you'll be pleased to hear) but an 'attempted coup" it was Obviously my fault, my dear binj. I always thought a coup was done by the military BTW in a democracy it is perfectly permissable for a political party to decide not to contest an election. Furthermore then PM Yingluck dissolved the House after her government was faced with ever growing anti-government protests because of the blanket amnesty bill her government tried to push through. It even covered her first to years in government, imagine! Need I go on? COUP: A sudden appropriation of leadership or power; Ever heard of a judicial coup? No military required. Are we still on the topic of PDRC which some like to confuse with yellows? Anti-government protests which some seem to confuse with "sudden appropriation of leadership or power"? What's next, anti-government protest to be made illegal in new law to be proposed by the "unknown status" government of our dear, mortally wounded Ms. Yingluck? no confusion dear rubl... like a banana slice 'em and you will indeed see yellow mush I think we have cleared up that a coup does not have to be a Military one off out for a beer have a nice evening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeO Posted March 19, 2014 Share Posted March 19, 2014 the yellows attempted coup is failing fast... wait then arrest them all for seeking to overthrow the elected government hope more companies like PTT Plc. will SUE the PDRC 'leaders' into the ground for business disruption - bankrupt them all - 37m is a good start Binj, I would be happy to engage in protracted discussion with you, but I have noted that all you do is raise nonsensical objections to anything anyone has to say. You are so far out of your depth, I think we need to call he lifeguards. Pathetic and insignificant...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now