webfact Posted April 14, 2014 Posted April 14, 2014 POLICE'S CAMPAIGNPolice officers keep an eye on people's homes over holidayThe NationBANGKOK: -- The number of homes nationwide placed under police guardianship during the April 8-17 holidays has risen to 3,471 - including 925 in Bangkok, the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB) secretary-general said yesterday.The scheme to have owners let police take care of their houses while they enjoy the long holiday break was supervised by Pol General Pongsapat Pongcharoen.Police are assigned to visit all houses registered with them under the scheme so that owners will be worry-free while on holiday.Pongsapat yesterday visited houses under Bang Chan police station's care.In Bangkok alone, Chokchai police station had the highest number of participating homes at 52, followed by Hua Mark (33), Tha Kham (30), Bang Na (28) and Lat Phrao and Min Buri (25 homes each).Among other provinces, Provincial Police Region 1 is caring for the most homes. Samut Prakan has reported the most participation at 149, followed by Nonthaburi with 73 and Pathum Thani with 52, he added.Pongsapat also inspected Khan Na Yao district's Surao Daeng community, which was reportedly among the city's top five drug-risk areas.Others included Pathum Wan district's Wat Doung Khae community, Don Muang district's Saphan Poon community, Bang Khen's Bang Bua community and Bang Kho Laem's Wat Phraya Krai community.Pongsapat also called at the Surao Daeng community's mosque, where the ONCB held anti-drug camp activities for some 170 youths from the neighbourhoods from April 5-14.-- The Nation 2014-04-15
Popular Post Tokay Posted April 14, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 14, 2014 Always wondered about this one. I don't trust the police to check on my home any more than I do a sleeping security guard. That's an invitation to be burgled. 8
Popular Post NongKhaiKid Posted April 14, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 14, 2014 I can report from personal experience that this scheme was tried throughout Britain decades ago and was dropped as unworkable plus had potential legal problems. The scheme was introduced in Thailand years back, was roundly criticised and disappeared. In the force I served in at the time the main problems were police visiting a house at regular times 24/7 drew attention and it wouldn't be long before it was clear the house was unoccupied and there was the crucial legal question of liability should the premises be broken into while under police stewardship. There were other issues too that soon made it clear the scheme was a non-starter. It's easy to see there are trust issues here apart from anything else and a good neighbour is a far better bet. 4
Popular Post Somtamnication Posted April 14, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 14, 2014 Like hiring foxes to watch the chickens? 12
kratiam Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Like hiring foxes to watch the chickens? Predictable & pathetic....
Bluespunk Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 'Police officers keep an eye on people's homes over holiday' Is this a euphemism? [not a smutty one of course ;-}] 2
Popular Post apetley Posted April 15, 2014 Popular Post Posted April 15, 2014 One of my friends tried this. No problems at his home for three years. Went on a trip back to Aus and asked the police to watch his house. When he returned it had been absolutely gutted to the point even plastic piping and cabling had been stolen. Wouldn't trust the RTPF as far as I could throw them. 3
MaxLee Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 The number of homes nationwide placed under police guardianship during the April 8-17 holidays has risen to 3,471 - including 925 in Bangkok, the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB) secretary-general said yesterday. Big Brother coming to Thailand.... lol, I prefer the army, because I don't trust a police force that is entirely controlled by Thaksin,...LOL
Tatsujin Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Like hiring foxes to watch the chickens? Predictable & pathetic.... . . . but so very true . . . 1
Somtamnication Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Like hiring foxes to watch the chickens? Predictable & pathetic.... LOL. Well, if you want to trust the TRTP to watch your house, you are a bigger fool than me.
bill014 Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 I can't believe that certain members are saying this won't work. Remember the old adage? Set a thief to catch a thief!!
JoePai Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Totally ineffective - just a way for the police to pocket money 1
chooka Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 I can report from personal experience that this scheme was tried throughout Britain decades ago and was dropped as unworkable plus had potential legal problems. The scheme was introduced in Thailand years back, was roundly criticised and disappeared. In the force I served in at the time the main problems were police visiting a house at regular times 24/7 drew attention and it wouldn't be long before it was clear the house was unoccupied and there was the crucial legal question of liability should the premises be broken into while under police stewardship. There were other issues too that soon made it clear the scheme was a non-starter. It's easy to see there are trust issues here apart from anything else and a good neighbour is a far better bet. Have the same thing in Australia for decades (Absent from Residence) The police are not allowed onto the premises unless something untoward is noticed, ie a suspect vehicle in the drive or outside. Police will just patrol these areas and make an entry on running sheets.
hawker9000 Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 'Keeping an eye on people's homes? Yeah, I'll just bet they do!
spidermike007 Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 This is a hysterically funny post. Wonder if it was written by George Carlin, from his grave? Imagine the police in Thailand performing a public service? Stretches the imagination to the point of breaking. They are a revenue collection agency. Why would they protect your home? What incentive do they have? Think about it. 1
edgarfriendly Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Quick! Someone jump to the defense of rapists, thieves & liars!
metisdead Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Some nonsense posts and replies have been removed.
spectrumisgreen Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Like hiring foxes to watch the chickens? ..but IF the foxes really.. REALLY.. promised, then surely the chickens can leave the empties out and, basically, come and go as they please, all with the total peace of mind of knowing what helpful, caring foxes they have as both their guardians and neighbours, no?
tomyummer Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 How does monkeys and whistles justify a removal of a post? Monkeys have been kept as household pets in other countries which also served as live alert animals.
Morch Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Would be interesting to know how many of the guarded households belong to police officers. Do they trust their own to keep an eye on their homes? Other interesting information would be knowing how many of these houses had break-ins during this time, and how this figure compares with the national average.
amse Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Having good bolt door locks, certain lights in the house on night timers, and close good friend neighbors to keep an eye out, are better protection ideas.
EyesWideOpen Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Like hiring foxes to watch the chickens? Predictable & pathetic.... Hmm.... Sad but true was the response that came to my mind.....
ggt Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 This is a hysterically funny post. Wonder if it was written by George Carlin, from his grave? Imagine the police in Thailand performing a public service? Stretches the imagination to the point of breaking. They are a revenue collection agency. Why would they protect your home? What incentive do they have? Think about it. The incentive...is to have unrestricted access to the vacant home...I could not rest for a moment...if my home was under police surveillance while I was away...
socksy01 Posted April 16, 2014 Posted April 16, 2014 I can report from personal experience that this scheme was tried throughout Britain decades ago and was dropped as unworkable plus had potential legal problems. The scheme was introduced in Thailand years back, was roundly criticised and disappeared. In the force I served in at the time the main problems were police visiting a house at regular times 24/7 drew attention and it wouldn't be long before it was clear the house was unoccupied and there was the crucial legal question of liability should the premises be broken into while under police stewardship. There were other issues too that soon made it clear the scheme was a non-starter. It's easy to see there are trust issues here apart from anything else and a good neighbour is a far better bet. Same - it was done away with in Edinburgh about 25 years ago and as you say the 'neds' were quick to latch on to the Police attention and it was easy pickings for them particularly in 'slag' areas. 1
H1w4yR1da Posted April 16, 2014 Posted April 16, 2014 Like hiring foxes to watch the chickens? You beat me to it. Foxes guarding the hen house indeed!Suzuki GSX-R1000 L3 182 hp in-line 4 Superbike 1
ableguy Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 They charge a thousand baht here in hua hin, they did one on out street and I watched them daily sign a piece of paper in the letter box with date and time. They never once even looked at the house let alone walk around it. Waste of time and money.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now