April 19, 201411 yr What a surprise our yellow buddies say the decision was down to intimidation. Yet when a decision is in favour of the anti-government protestors it is based on a fair judicial system. again sorry to burst your bubble of superiority My self, scamper and others have said we need to respect the decision of the courts but as the ruling was no evidence was given to prove the case against then Can you please tell us what evidence, would you have accepted of there guilt besides a 5 page drawn out guilty plea or a letter from the Dubai master saying the are guilty we are waiting for your and other red shirt supporters to answer this question ?
April 19, 201411 yr What a surprise our yellow buddies say the decision was down to intimidation. Yet when a decision is in favour of the anti-government protestors it is based on a fair judicial system. It seems all the red shirt lovers have deserted this posting No one wants to answer Posting 31 before you make any opinions All full of the high and might opinion, but when it come down to facts they run in droves
April 20, 201411 yr What a surprise our yellow buddies say the decision was down to intimidation. Yet when a decision is in favour of the anti-government protestors it is based on a fair judicial system. It seems all the red shirt lovers have deserted this posting No one wants to answer Posting 31 before you make any opinions All full of the high and might opinion, but when it come down to facts they run in droves There you go again, another insultive post with no substance. The Court has made it's decision, what is there to argue about?
Create an account or sign in to comment