Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Chiang Mai wants to promote “Long stay tourism”



Pushing for a 3 year visa

n8longstay.jpg


The
arrow-10x10.png
Chamber of Commerce is working to pressure the Thai government in increasing the length of time for a retirement extension and allowing 90 day reporting to be done online to ease the process for elderly visitors, especially Japanese who make up a large portion of retired foreigners living in Chiang Mai.


http://www.chiangmai-mail.com/current/news.shtml


  • Like 2
Posted

We live in hope................................I suggested this idea 2 years ago, ie we pay 1900 x 3 up front for a 3 year visa. Was met with a shake of the head.

I don't think they could cope with on line reporting.I mean how long did the bar code system last, ? once for me.

However the Japanese do seem to have more pull than any other country apart from the Russians.laugh.png

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

yeah but then those despicable scamming untrustworthy farang (that's you) would take all their money out of their bank account in the interim

Edited by 4dyg
  • Like 1
Posted

Good idea, but a bit racist, no?

especially Japanese who make up a large portion of retired foreigners living in Chiang Mai.
Posted

Good idea, but a bit racist, no?

especially Japanese who make up a large portion of retired foreigners living in Chiang Mai.

I keep seeing the Japanese army guy around in his uniform.

Last week he was walking around with a rifle in his hands, bit iffy considering the current situation.

  • Like 1
Posted

3 x 800,000 up front for 3 year extension sad.png

In principle yes, but locking up £50k for three years at dismal interest rates of return, that's scary. If it were simply proof of assets when applying, that would be good.

  • Like 1
Posted

Good idea, but a bit racist, no?

especially Japanese who make up a large portion of retired foreigners living in Chiang Mai.

I keep seeing the Japanese army guy around in his uniform.

Last week he was walking around with a rifle in his hands, bit iffy considering the current situation.

That guy is actually Thai according to a friend who apparently lives near him (in the old city area).

As a matter of coincidence we were just talking about him yesterday and saying we hope he doesn't get carted away!! crying.gif

Posted

I sincerely hope not, CM is aleady looking much too much like an open geriatric ward.

Or, if they do, I hope the financial criteria are also revised (upwards) and enforced.

Posted

I sincerely hope not, CM is aleady looking much too much like an open geriatric ward.

Or, if they do, I hope the financial criteria are also revised (upwards) and enforced.

Hate to disappoint but most geriatrics are here to stay, whenever the financial criteria is uprated it typically involves grandfathering existing visa's under existing schemes.

Posted

I sincerely hope not, CM is aleady looking much too much like an open geriatric ward.

Or, if they do, I hope the financial criteria are also revised (upwards) and enforced.

Hate to disappoint but most geriatrics are here to stay, whenever the financial criteria is uprated it typically involves grandfathering existing visa's under existing schemes.

Uh, I beg to differ

- the forum is littered with the "I can't take it any more, I'm off" threads, usually followed by the witty "Don't let the door hit you etc etc"

- "here to stay" - hm an unfortunate choice of phrase in relation to geriatrics, wherever they may be

- visa rules can and have been rewritten, as we have seen in the last year, nay the last few weeks; and at long last it appears that the rules relating to overstaying have begun to be enforced a little more effectively - delighted.

Posted

I sincerely hope not, CM is aleady looking much too much like an open geriatric ward.

Or, if they do, I hope the financial criteria are also revised (upwards) and enforced.

Hate to disappoint but most geriatrics are here to stay, whenever the financial criteria is uprated it typically involves grandfathering existing visa's under existing schemes.

Uh, I beg to differ

- the forum is littered with the "I can't take it any more, I'm off" threads, usually followed by the witty "Don't let the door hit you etc etc"

- "here to stay" - hm an unfortunate choice of phrase in relation to geriatrics, wherever they may be

- visa rules can and have been rewritten, as we have seen in the last year, nay the last few weeks; and at long last it appears that the rules relating to overstaying have begun to be enforced a little more effectively - delighted.

Let me put this in simpler terms:

Holders of O-A visa's today will typically not see their minimum income or money in the bank limits changed, even if new higher amounts are agreed for new O-A visa applicants, historically this has been the case and it's likely to remain so going forward.

The odd thread that does appear where the OP tells us he's off, represents only a very small percentage of all visa holders. There's nothing to suggest that such people are in the main O-A retirement visa holders, the obverse is more probable since retirees tend to "settle in" and are not as transient as younger people.

What has happened is that retirees on fixed income have been squeezed in recent years as THB has strengthened against their home currency, that has caused some retirees to leave and is your best hope if your dreams are to come true! But be careful what you wish for Ajarn because such a development would almost certainly cause inflation which means your teachers salary will go less far and it might turn out to be you that has to leave.

Finally, the Christian grave yard at Gymkhana is home to many ex-pats who are indeed, here to stay!

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Good idea, but a bit racist, no?

especially Japanese who make up a large portion of retired foreigners living in Chiang Mai.

in the western world yes racist & the poster would lose his job. Here a simple statement of fact.

Bad Tony

Posted

Think they'll have to wait 2 years until the Junta is gone - their trend on immigration and those here on continuing tourist visas is hardly aimed at making long stay easier. Retirement extensions might stand a greater chance - though not sure how that equates to "long term tourism", as opposed to "immigration for purposes of retirement". The way to dal with it would be to grant retirees PR after a given time without the costs or red tape.

Posted

Good idea, but a bit racist, no?

especially Japanese who make up a large portion of retired foreigners living in Chiang Mai.

Why worry about a tiny piece of commentary if the new regulations benefit everyone equally? If anything, you should be thanking the Japanese if they were the ones who got the gov's attention.

Posted

yeah but then those despicable scamming untrustworthy farang (that's you) would take all their money out of their bank account in the interim

They don't call you Mr kindness and the possessor of a charitable heart for nothing. Keep up the community spirit.

Spidermike007

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...