Jump to content

Russian out-in visa runs ‘same as other nationalities’ – Thai Immigration chief


Recommended Posts

Russian out-in visa runs 'same as other nationalities' – Immigration chief

So despite the unique agreement between the two countries, Russians will face the same tests when they do an out-in run as do citizens of other “visa on arrival” countries.

Fair enough, what's the problem?

Just prove you are not coming here to work, have enough funds, no problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

All the usual rambling and meandering and wandering off topic:

The OP included:

"He explained that if they cannot prove that they are re-entering the country for tourism (for example by showing hotel bookings, a ticket out of the country or sufficient funds to support themselves while in Thailand), “They won’t be allowed in.”"

"Sufficient funds" has often been quoted [for getting through Immigration] as being something like 20,000฿ in cash.

The options for many Russians who come to Thailand for reasons other than tourism to have that sort of pocket-change are endless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every country has its' list of preferred nation status.

They make different agreements with different countries, it's not about racism or unfairness.

I pay more for a Laos visa as a Canadian than American does, even though we didn't bomb the <deleted> out of them.

Ozzy's pay less as well,always wondered what Canadians did to upset Laos,never meet one i didn't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what the big fuss on here is all about.

Thailand and Russia have special visa agreement that's been the case for some time.

The immigration head has just confirmed that yes that is still true but Russians if asked will have to prove they are here for legit reasons and not to work illegally.

Where's the problem with that?

Seems like a good thing to me. For all nationalities not just Russians.

And for the guys nit picking at the definition of a tourist. Sure maybe you are only able to get / afford 2 weeks holiday a year but not everyone is in that situation.

Even when I was a skint student on summer holidays from Uni I would travel for 4-6 months at a time.

I can easily be away for much longer stints of time now.

And usually when I go abroad now I prefer to stay for a few months in one place, rent an apartment, and get to know somewhere not move around every 2 days and stay in hotels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that one class of so called tourist have been left unclassed like, I'm talking about

people who wishes to spend more time in Thailand, be it by them selves or with loved one,

and not necessarily working or engaging in money making in any form, just harmless loafers,

those are the one that are younger than the retired age, what type of visa should they get

that will allow them to in and out at will without being looked at as a villains and cheaters?

and they are spending substantial money supporting the Thai economy over a long term....

well there is the infamous Elite Card.. depends a lot on trusting the authorities to keep their word. Didn't end too well last time..

Edited by bangon04
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what the big fuss on here is all about.

Thailand and Russia have special visa agreement that's been the case for some time.

The immigration head has just confirmed that yes that is still true but Russians if asked will have to prove they are here for legit reasons and not to work illegally.

Where's the problem with that?

The problem is that many members are conservatives with racist, prejudicial, biased views toward certain nationalities. Russian is possibly the first, next is Nigeria and african countries, equally hated are Islamic countries in general. Then comes China as you have seen above, but if you keep looking you will find that dislike people from countries bordering with their one, and at the end of the day, anyone that is not them exactly.

Basically they think they are the only one entitled to the gracious treatment that foreigners receive in Thailand, and any piece of news that hints differently causes great rage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well there is the infamous Elite Card.. depends a lot on trusting the authorities to keep their word. Didn't end too well last time..

What are you hinting? Nothing has ended, elite card is still sold and honoured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that one class of so called tourist have been left unclassed like, I'm talking about

people who wishes to spend more time in Thailand, be it by them selves or with loved one,

and not necessarily working or engaging in money making in any form, just harmless loafers,

those are the one that are younger than the retired age, what type of visa should they get

that will allow them to in and out at will without being looked at as a villains and cheaters?

Im really looking forward to seeing a new "Harmless Loafer" category on the visa application form.....cheesy.gif !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should make special allowances for Russia because of shared values: rule by mafia and plutocracy; no rule of law; xenophobia and victim complex; palm greasing as performing art; chosen unique people whom normal expectations do not apply, no freedom of press....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legislate in haste, repent at leisure.

Someone in the government needs to identify what the problem is with immigration...and if it is people working without visas then enforce this legislation as it is already illegal. WE have plenty of farangs working without permits in our town...60 or 70 teachers for a start...let the police haul them in...they know where they work, why wait until they go to the border? Deport them for working illegally. But if you want to retain English teachers, then pass some legislation that enables such people to obtain a permit easily and cheaply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens if you are a tourist but owning a condo and wnat to live in your own accomodation?

Or maybe you could buy a condo in Singapore, in K.L., in Tokyo, in Amsterdam and every other country

you intend to pass through -- you could save a lot on hotel bills, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WE have plenty of farangs working without permits in our town...60 or 70 teachers for a start...let the police haul them in...they know where they work, why wait until they go to the border? Deport them for working illegally.

You've lived in Thailand too long mate.

This is total Thai logic.

None of these people want to work illegally, face arrest and being deported, do border runs every 30 days and all the other headaches.

The company employing them is either refusing to apply for their work permit or hiring people who are not qualified to teach.

The company is in the wrong here and they should be dealt with not the employee who is doing what he can to earn a wage and has their hands tied.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legislate in haste, repent at leisure.

Actually in this case nothing was legislated, and nothing repented.

Someone in the government needs to identify what the problem is with immigration...and if it is people working without visas then enforce this legislation as it is already illegal. WE have plenty of farangs working without permits in our town...60 or 70 teachers for a start...let the police haul them in...they know where they work, why wait until they go to the border? Deport them for working illegally. But if you want to retain English teachers, then pass some legislation that enables such people to obtain a permit easily and cheaply.

It is not a legislative problem. Teachers can obtain a work permit easily. They even benefit from waivers when they haven't all the qualifications. It is the schools that do not bother doing that, so they can hire and sack as they please, do not pay social contributions, and keep the foreigner hanging. Foreigners accept that also to recoup the tax otherwise they would have to pay on their small (for western standards) salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A post containing overly derogatory racist comments has been removed:

11) You will not post slurs, degrading or overly negative comments directed towards Thailand, specific locations, Thai institutions such as the judicial or law enforcement system, Thai culture, Thai people or any other group on the basis of race, nationality, religion, gender or sexual orientation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens if you are a tourist but owning a condo and wnat to live in your own accomodation?

You must be kicking yourself hard for posting such a stupid question.

Firstly most tourists do not own foreign property, least of all in Thailand where ownership is invariably leasehold. Only a Thai national can ordinarily own the Freehold of the land the property stands on.

Secondly, assuming you do own leasehold of a property you can indeed live in said property for any number of days, months or years in accordance with the type of Visa in your possession.

Normally expatriate foreign nationals own leasehold on property since by virtue of expatriate status they have ceased to be tourists,....'someone who visits for a holiday of only a few weeks at a time or for one or two years in succession'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a joke it is.

Fancy making a deal like that ...endless 30 day visa exemptions

And then say they cannot do it.

And then hit the press saying how these are not "quality" tourists.

Left hand don't know what the right hand doing.

Wasters.

Edited by Nuddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens if you are a tourist but owning a condo and wnat to live in your own accomodation?

You must be kicking yourself hard for posting such a stupid question.

Firstly most tourists do not own foreign property, least of all in Thailand where ownership is invariably leasehold. Only a Thai national can ordinarily own the Freehold of the land the property stands on.

Secondly, assuming you do own leasehold of a property you can indeed live in said property for any number of days, months or years in accordance with the type of Visa in your possession.

Normally expatriate foreign nationals own leasehold on property since by virtue of expatriate status they have ceased to be tourists,....'someone who visits for a holiday of only a few weeks at a time or for one or two years in succession'.

Do you feel big and tough for disemboweling someone for posting a simple real estate query?

There are far too many of you phillistines on this site.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a farcical allowance for Russians.

There are far more Australians that visit and its proximity is closer than Russia.

The USA is and always has been a longtime supporter of Thailand.

One could go on and on...

On and on on what? Last time I checked, Americans and Australians are allowed too.

You are bothered that Russians are allowed, and then who else? Make a list and send it to the Thai government, let us know the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...