webfact Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 TOT and CAT set for new partnerships with private operatorsUsanee MongkolpornThe NationBANGKOK: -- TOT and CAT Telecom are expected to clinch new partnerships with private telecommunication operators this year as they try to survive market competition.TOT has announced its intention to select new partners this quarter. Five private telecom operators have expressed interest in being its partners, including both of its own concession holders: Advanced Info Service (AIS) and True Corp. The others are Loxley, Samart Corp and Mobile LTE.AIS and True have proposed partnering with TOT in almost every area of the state agency's business, ranging from mobile-phone service to telecom infrastructure leasing.True reportedly proposed to both CAT and TOT that they sell their telecom network assets to the True Telecommunications Growth Infrastructure Fund - part of True's attempt to secure a partnership with both state agencies. CAT and True are long-standing partners in providing third-generation cellular service on the 850-megahertz spectrum.A TOT source said True had also proposed to collaborate with the agency on the submarine cable network and to establish a mobile-phone network for TOT's exclusive use to wholesale bandwidth. In addition, it proposed helping TOT market its fixed-line telephone and Internet services. True also plans to lease from TOT its own fixed-line telephone network, which it has operated under a TOT concession, once that concession ends in three years.The TOT source added that AIS proposed to manage jointly with the agency the company's telecommunication towers, currently operated by AIS under TOT concession. They might set up a joint venture to manage the towers. The largest cellular operator is also keen to lease TOT's 3G network, which has the capacity for 1 million phone numbers.As for CAT, the agency and its concession holder Total Access Communication signed a memorandum of understanding in late 2014 to establish a collaborative relationship and enter constructive dialogue to promote the sharing of their network infrastructure and network-access businesses. Both CAT and TOT want strong partners to help them survive after they began passing their annual concession income, their main revenue source, to the state from December 2013 as required under the 2010 Frequency Allocation Act.Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/business/TOT-and-CAT-set-for-new-partnerships-with-private--30251241.html-- The Nation 2015-01-06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sydebolle Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 TOT, TT&T, CAT - all the same; medieval dinosaurs in 21st century telecom environment. Another entities which suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaltsc Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 "TOT and CAT Telecom are expected to clinch new partnerships with private telecommunication operators this year as they try to survive market competition." Today's version of Packard partnering with Studebaker. Obsolete is obsolete,no matter who you partner with. If they want to survive, have a successful foreign telecommunication company take over and eliminate the outdated monopoly of lousy technology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmitch Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Why the *&% don't they merge the two? What a waste of Government funds to run two archaic telecom operations as separate entities. Made one overseas call to an answerphone this week so anticipating a bill of around 10 baht from CAT in addition to the regular one from TOT. Of course highly politicised management from both sides will fight to stay separate but would this scenario exist in the first world? (Cue several examples of developed nations with similar operations). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rickirs Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 "Both CAT and TOT want strong partners to help them survive after they began passing their annual concession income, their main revenue source, to the state from December 2013 as required under the 2010 Frequency Allocation Act." Really, who wants to be a partner with a business that must pass its revenues to the state? Any partner will only be allowed minority ownership, must operate according to state leadership, and have no entitlement to profits. For the state getting access to new sources of capital would be a bonus for its own enrichment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now