I still receive a daily email newsletter from the Bangkok Post as of today, and it is still free. It provides a list of links to the Daily Roundup and Breaking News stories, and as far as I can tell, those top 10 daily stories are all still freely accessible. It seems that only certain sections and types of content are now behind a paywall. I’m not really sure how anybody can complain about that. At the end of the day, the Bangkok Post is a business, and businesses need revenue and profits to survive. Keep in mind that the Bangkok Post was established in 1946, but it didn’t have an online presence until 1996. For the first 50 years of its existence, if you wanted to read the newspaper on a daily basis, you had to buy a physical copy of the printed newspaper. Then, when the Internet came along, some of its content became available online for free. The full newspaper in digital/e-paper form came later, in 2006. Somehow, though, once newspapers started putting news online for free, people began to regard free online access as the normal thing, as if the newspaper had no costs involved in producing it. There are paid journalists, editors, photographers, correspondents, printing and publication costs, offices, technology, and all the other expenses involved in running a newspaper. And compared with other major newspapers, the Bangkok Post subscription isn’t particularly expensive. The New York Times and Wall Street Journal, for example, are more than double what the Bangkok Post is now charging monthly for full digital access. Personally, I’m not bothered by the Bangkok Post putting some of its content behind a paywall. Some publications are entirely paywalled and give you nothing for free, like the two I mentioned. So if the Bangkok Post continues to give me the daily top 10 stories through the free newsletter, then I have nothing to complain about. If I want the full publication, I can pay for it. That seems more than fair. If you don’t want to pay, that’s perfectly fine too. You simply accept what they’re willing to provide for free, which still seems like quite a bit. I don’t see anything unfair about that. Just because the Bangkok Post provided most or all of its online content for free for many years doesn’t mean it can necessarily continue doing so indefinitely. Perhaps advertising revenue isn’t enough anymore. Perhaps costs have increased. Perhaps they were faced with a choice between introducing paid subscriptions and cutting back on journalists, departments, and coverage. Maybe the subscription model will work, and maybe it won’t. Who knows? I suspect they didn’t make the decision lightly. Personally, I think it’s worth looking at it from both sides of the coin rather than assuming that the newspaper is simply trying to squeeze money out of its readers. Maybe they simply had no choice. If you don’t want to subscribe, fair enough. But I don’t think the Bangkok Post is doing anything particularly unreasonable by asking people to pay something if they want the full commercial product. As I mentioned, I won’t be paying for a subscription, but I’m perfectly happy with what they are still willing to offer free of charge.