Jump to content

New Charter: Major changes sought by Thai Cabinet


webfact

Recommended Posts

NEW CHARTER
Major changes sought by Cabinet

THE NATION

BANGKOK: -- PRIME MINISTER General Prayut Chan-o-cha and Cabinet proposed amendments yesterday to several controversial provisions in the new charter, such as the open-list electoral system for party-list MPs, the picking of senators and articles related to reform and reconciliation.

The proposals were submitted to the Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC).

The Cabinet has said it wants to abolish Article 105, which stipulates an open-list electoral system for MPs. Ministers also opposed Article 121 on the acquisition of senators, especially where it states that there should be an "Examination Committee for Senate candidates".

The Cabinet is also opposing Article 130, which allows profiles of ministerial candidates to be scrutinised by senators and Article 147, which stipulates that no less than 40 senators can propose bills.

Many provisions of the draft charter also need to be amended or removed, the Cabinet noted.

It also said that Articles 282 to 296 on reform mechanisms and strategy should be removed because the framework for them was already written in Article 279, which calls for the setup of a National Reform Strategy Committee and National Reform Assembly.

These organisations are required to propose amendments to reform-related bills, monitor, assist and direct future administration in relation to reform and reconciliation. Cabinet also suggested that the CDC reconsider introducing a mixed-member proportional electoral system and see if the country would be better off sticking with the original electoral system used under the 2007 Charter. Prayut also submitted a document to the CDC, which states his views on the draft. He said the new constitution should reflect Thailand's historical and cultural factors in order to offer a way out in case crises arise in the future. He said the charter should not be too long and its articles practical.

Cabinet also offered opinions and made several points, such as merging certain independent agencies that have overlapping responsibilities in order to tighten the budget. It also said certain articles put too much restriction on the administration, which may make executives too hesitant to make decisions, worrying that they might violate the charter, which would result in a lack of dynamism.

It also spoke against the introduction of "political groups" in the election, fearing that they would weaken parties or be used by parties as their nominees.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Major-changes-sought-by-Cabinet-30261023.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-05-27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok.

Um, what about the parts that gerrymander the country into oblivion, and parts that allow the artificial creation of emergencies to dump a PM, and the unappointed senators having dominance?

Ok. Same same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Cabinet also suggested that the CDC reconsider introducing a mixed-member proportional electoral system"

Oh, the betrayal.

The CDC took great deliberation in expense, time, and travel to look at successful electoral systems in democratic nations wherein one party could not dominate the government - labeled to so-called party coup. It ultimately chose to adopt Germany's MMP system. And all the while the Cabinet led by PM and NCPO Chief Prayut knew that the MMP nor any other foreign electoral system would not be acceptable.

What the Junta prefers is closer to a one-party system controlled by an unelected politboro. But it doesn't seem to have the courage to openly declare Communist China's electroral system as its model for Thailand. That would make a mockery of the Junta's roadmap to democracy. Prayut would become a communist soldier and not remain a democractic soldier.

Ultimately, it doesn't matter what electoral system is impressed on the Thai people. So long as the military can overthrow elected governments and abolish constitutions with immunity from prosecution, the Thai people do not own their own sovereignty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wha do they still need the house of Senators ???

cross it out and use that money for education !!!

If charter is too strong, officials will fear to make decision Ha ha 55555555555555

they will fear to be panished if they not keep the law !!

Thai officers like to work on bribe and not on law !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""