Leicester City orgy trio sacked for verbally abusing Thai women

[little mary sunshine]

Finally, took them long enough....should have been sacked for stupid too

Some good will ambassadors

[borisloosebrain]

Tough break lads,...it's not as if they did anything your average British Tory politician or Aristocrat wouldn't do in their spare time.

Edited June 18, 2015 by borisloosebrain

[natway09]

For the last time, all they did wrong was taking their phone/cameras out of their pants

[tonbridgebrit]

Of course if they had not sent the video to their mates- they paid for sex and presumably enjoyed it - millions do this every day.

Everything you post is out there for ever- this video will surface for years ,

What I find slightly strange is the fact that you would get together with your work colleagues to watch each other have sex- then post it. Is this normal behaviour? If you are playing team sports- nudity in the changing room ( after rugby at school we used to a vast bath for the whole team- probably not very hygienic ! ) is quite healthy.

But surely some things you keep private- is this a sign of a highly sexualised / porn western culture?

I just find it a bit odd.

"What I find slightly strange is the fact that you would get together with your work colleagues to watch each other have sex- then post it. Is this normal behaviour?".

NO, this is not normal. It is perverted. And sex videos depicting this type of perversion is not good. These men doing this are actually 'advertising' this kind of perversion. The internet, with this type of pornography, is making this type of stuff look 'normal'. It is certainly not normal. How many people have done this before, where they get together with two friends, and are also with three women, and they have sex all on the same bed ? And have their bottom-hole licked ?

[AyG]

And have their bottom-hole licked ?

one of the players had his bottom-hole licked and he demanded and enjoyed it

Methinks someone is rather too uptight about anilingus.

The behaviour of these fine sporting gentlemen isn't particularly despicable just because one of them enjoys a bit of tongue on ass action. There are plenty of other reasons to consider them utterly contemptible.

Or perhaps you're really from Tunbridge, not Tonbridge, and are the original "Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells"?

[samuibeachcomber]

For the last time, all they did wrong was taking their phone/cameras out of their pants

They foolishly posted their antics.But to ridicule,verbally abuse and maybe physically abuse shows their lack of respect.And had they not of posted their night out no one would have known and they would be doing it again,hopefully it will be a lesson learned.The club should have had the balls to sack them within 48 hours,nt wait this long.

[MaeJoMTB]

The club didn't have much choice. Abusive racists do not fit football's image.

I thought that was what football was all about!

[ddavidovsky]

Their lives are ruined. They didn't harm anyone else. Totally unfair.

They are not ambassadors for their club every minute of their lives. They're entitled to some time of their own. And it's only Leicester bleedin City. I just hope they can sue for damages the 'friend' who sold them out to the papers.

Narrow minded folk who rise up in outrage at anything to do with sex are to blame. They are a public nuisance.

[rwdrwdrwd]

Firstly their lives aren't "ruined" they will get a contract elsewhere.

Secondly, they were on a business trip, this wasn't their down time.

Thirdly this isn't really about 'sex', everyone does it. It's about the way they acted, not the action that occurred.

As a Leicester fan - good riddance.

Edited June 18, 2015 by rwdrwdrwd

[sambum]

Disgusting. Why on earth should they lose their livelihoods because of something they did in their own time which had nothing to do with their ability to do their job? They can still kick a ball just as well as they did before.

(BTW, I'm not condoning their behaviour at all, which was also disgusting.)

As "ambassadors" for their club, they should have had more sense than publicising their "disgusting" behaviour, whether they did it in their own time or not. If it had been kept behind "closed doors" they would still have their jobs, the girls would probably not have had a clue what was being said about them, and were probably paid well for their services.

They should have remembered the old adage "What goes on on tour stays on tour"

[Seastallion]

Yeah, I've always questioned this sort of reaction by sports clubs. It happens to rugby players too. "Bringing the sport into disrepute" is often what's cited.

I think there may be more in it than just one guy saying "slit eye". One guy said it, so why all 3 sacked?

More than the silly racism, I was disturbed by the chap that said "lick it...I SAID LICK IT!!". He sounded quite....more than just domineering, ...almost on the verge of violence. Threatening. And him repeating the order in such a threatening voice, suggests she didn't want to "lick it"...he was forcing her:

I think there was more than just a dumb word that has led to their sacking.

Why would that disturb you? You have never been dominate in a ex before? Telling a girl to do that is not bad. Being dominate in sex is not my forte but I don't look down on it the way you do.

The question is why they got sacked? Just saying slit eye doesn't during sex doesn't seem like a valid reason. Although I didn't watch the vdo I don't see why all 3 would be sacked as well. Their futures gone for comments made during a sex orgy.

Maybe you have not been to a sex orgy before. But verbal abuse is common for both sexes to do. Passive and dominance is also common! It is not like you are making love to a woman you met and like.

Their comments should have been taken lightly to say the least simply because of he circumstances.

I did not make a judgement on dominance or on verbal abuse...I was disturbed by the threatening tone. Go have a listen...it's obvious he's forcing her to do something she doesn't want to do..."lick it......I SAID LICK IT!". It was not only threatening, it was forceful, and it may have been disgusting.

It's a possible explanation for why all 3 got sacked; Some nasty stuff was going on, not just one guy saying something dumb.

If verbal abuse is common from both sexes in your social circles, then good for you.....your world and mine are quite different.

I don't have to like a woman I'm having sex with to treat her as a human.

Just because you don't know about something or have never done it does not make it bad. Your misunderstanding does not make it wrong. Also, learn to understand English please.. I believe I did say that this was not my forte.

Actually, it is you who needs English comprehension practice.

If we're talking about violence and force during sex (as I was), yes, I have never done that....but I believe society generally considers it bad. I don't have any misunderstanding, unlike yourself....it's not your forte, but you claim to know it's common....ok. Your social circles, or your preference in movies, because it is certainly not common amongst the people I know.

[thesetat2013]

Yeah, I've always questioned this sort of reaction by sports clubs. It happens to rugby players too. "Bringing the sport into disrepute" is often what's cited.

I think there may be more in it than just one guy saying "slit eye". One guy said it, so why all 3 sacked?

More than the silly racism, I was disturbed by the chap that said "lick it...I SAID LICK IT!!". He sounded quite....more than just domineering, ...almost on the verge of violence. Threatening. And him repeating the order in such a threatening voice, suggests she didn't want to "lick it"...he was forcing her:

I think there was more than just a dumb word that has led to their sacking.

Why would that disturb you? You have never been dominate in a ex before? Telling a girl to do that is not bad. Being dominate in sex is not my forte but I don't look down on it the way you do.

The question is why they got sacked? Just saying slit eye doesn't during sex doesn't seem like a valid reason. Although I didn't watch the vdo I don't see why all 3 would be sacked as well. Their futures gone for comments made during a sex orgy.

Maybe you have not been to a sex orgy before. But verbal abuse is common for both sexes to do. Passive and dominance is also common! It is not like you are making love to a woman you met and like.

Their comments should have been taken lightly to say the least simply because of he circumstances.

I did not make a judgement on dominance or on verbal abuse...I was disturbed by the threatening tone. Go have a listen...it's obvious he's forcing her to do something she doesn't want to do..."lick it......I SAID LICK IT!". It was not only threatening, it was forceful, and it may have been disgusting.

It's a possible explanation for why all 3 got sacked; Some nasty stuff was going on, not just one guy saying something dumb.

If verbal abuse is common from both sexes in your social circles, then good for you.....your world and mine are quite different.

I don't have to like a woman I'm having sex with to treat her as a human.

Just because you don't know about something or have never done it does not make it bad. Your misunderstanding does not make it wrong. Also, learn to understand English please.. I believe I did say that this was not my forte.

Actually, it is you who needs English comprehension practice.

If we're talking about violence and force during sex (as I was), yes, I have never done that....but I believe society generally considers it bad. I don't have any misunderstanding, unlike yourself....it's not your forte, but you claim to know it's common....ok. Your social circles, or your preference in movies, because it is certainly not common amongst the people I know.

Seriously! So you know what goes on behind closed doors and are IN-TOUCH with the people of the world's preferences on sexual behavior? I believe I stand by my reply before. Get real OK.

[uty6543]

Of course if they had not sent the video to their mates- they paid for sex and presumably enjoyed it - millions do this every day.

Everything you post is out there for ever- this video will surface for years ,

What I find slightly strange is the fact that you would get together with your work colleagues to watch each other have sex- then post it. Is this normal behaviour? If you are playing team sports- nudity in the changing room ( after rugby at school we used to a vast bath for the whole team- probably not very hygienic ! ) is quite healthy.

But surely some things you keep private- is this a sign of a highly sexualised / porn western culture?

I just find it a bit odd.

"What I find slightly strange is the fact that you would get together with your work colleagues to watch each other have sex- then post it. Is this normal behaviour?".

NO, this is not normal. It is perverted. And sex videos depicting this type of perversion is not good. These men doing this are actually 'advertising' this kind of perversion. The internet, with this type of pornography, is making this type of stuff look 'normal'. It is certainly not normal. How many people have done this before, where they get together with two friends, and are also with three women, and they have sex all on the same bed ? And have their bottom-hole licked ?

There is nothing perverted about what these 3 young men did. What ever consenting adults do is up to them. I have never done the same as these 3 did but then they may not enjoyed some of the pleasures I have. Yet.

Maybe you only make love with your wife on a Saturday night with the light off of course in the missionary position but there other ways to enjoy sex. People have been enjoying sex in a variety of ways since men and women were first on earth.

Just out of interest how do you know what sort of porngraphy is available on the Internet? Research?

[brewsterbudgen]

Of course if they had not sent the video to their mates- they paid for sex and presumably enjoyed it - millions do this every day.

Everything you post is out there for ever- this video will surface for years ,

What I find slightly strange is the fact that you would get together with your work colleagues to watch each other have sex- then post it. Is this normal behaviour? If you are playing team sports- nudity in the changing room ( after rugby at school we used to a vast bath for the whole team- probably not very hygienic ! ) is quite healthy.

But surely some things you keep private- is this a sign of a highly sexualised / porn western culture?

I just find it a bit odd.

"What I find slightly strange is the fact that you would get together with your work colleagues to watch each other have sex- then post it. Is this normal behaviour?".

NO, this is not normal. It is perverted. And sex videos depicting this type of perversion is not good. These men doing this are actually 'advertising' this kind of perversion. The internet, with this type of pornography, is making this type of stuff look 'normal'. It is certainly not normal. How many people have done this before, where they get together with two friends, and are also with three women, and they have sex all on the same bed ? And have their bottom-hole licked ?

There is nothing perverted about what these 3 young men did. What ever consenting adults do is up to them. I have never done the same as these 3 did but then they may not enjoyed some of the pleasures I have. Yet.

Maybe you only make love with your wife on a Saturday night with the light off of course in the missionary position but there other ways to enjoy sex. People have been enjoying sex in a variety of ways since men and women were first on earth.

Just out of interest how do you know what sort of porngraphy is available on the Internet? Research?

Are people on this Forum obsessed with sex? The sex aspect of this is irrelevant, except for the purient!

[MaeJoMTB]

How many people have done this before, where they get together with two friends, and are also with three women, and they have sex all on the same bed ? And have their bottom-hole licked ?

Almost everyone that's had the chance. as far as I can see.

You should get out a bit more, you're missing a lot.

I think 'Swingers' is the word you are looking for.

[ddavidovsky]

Firstly their lives aren't "ruined" they will get a contract elsewhere.

Secondly, they were on a business trip, this wasn't their down time.

Thirdly this isn't really about 'sex', everyone does it. It's about the way they acted, not the action that occurred.

As a Leicester fan - good riddance.

Wrong, wrong and wrong.

They will suffer for this for the rest of their lives, in untold ways, public and private. I wouldn't blame them if they are currently feeling suicidal.

People have down time on business trips - especially on business trips, because business trips are exhausting. Anyway, the public outcry had little to do with the fact that this was a business trip.

If you know anything about British society, you'll know this is all about sex. The racism thing was blown-up by the papers as an excuse for showing the video because "Reserve Team Footballers Have Sex With Prostitutes" wasn't in itself sufficient justification to show it, and by god, the papers wanted to cash in on this.

As a Leicester City fan you should support your players on the pitch and get out of their private lives.

[mick01827]

Their lives are ruined. They didn't harm anyone else. Totally unfair.

They are not ambassadors for their club every minute of their lives. They're entitled to some time of their own. And it's only Leicester bleedin City. I just hope they can sue for damages the 'friend' who sold them out to the papers.

Narrow minded folk who rise up in outrage at anything to do with sex are to blame. They are a public nuisance.

It's actually nothing to do with the sex, it's to do with their attitude towards racism

[ddavidovsky]

Their lives are ruined. They didn't harm anyone else. Totally unfair.

They are not ambassadors for their club every minute of their lives. They're entitled to some time of their own. And it's only Leicester bleedin City. I just hope they can sue for damages the 'friend' who sold them out to the papers.

Narrow minded folk who rise up in outrage at anything to do with sex are to blame. They are a public nuisance.

It's actually nothing to do with the sex, it's to do with their attitude towards racism

In Guangzhou once I saw a big banner that said "Welcome big-nose friends". I asked my Chinese friend what it was about and she said 'that's what we call westerners.'

Hilarious. No offence taken. People have different physical characteristics - it's not racist to recognise that. These lads are not racist. They surely found the girl's eyes attractive, which is why the girls were there. It's clear enough that the language was used in a faux-rough way for the ears of the other lads, because that is a laddish method of peer-bonding. There was also some subtle British class mockery. One of the lads was imitating a posh voice, and the 'slit-eye' phrase was made famous by the Duke of Edinburgh and now serves as a parody of colonial arrogance. Society needs to show a lot more emotional intelligence in understanding these things.

The papers played up the racism thing in order to justify showing the video, and they wanted to do that because of the public's prurient interest in sex. If the Briish public weren't so damn childish and "oooh matron" about sex, this would never have even made the newspapers.

[brewsterbudgen]

Their lives are ruined. They didn't harm anyone else. Totally unfair.

They are not ambassadors for their club every minute of their lives. They're entitled to some time of their own. And it's only Leicester bleedin City. I just hope they can sue for damages the 'friend' who sold them out to the papers.

Narrow minded folk who rise up in outrage at anything to do with sex are to blame. They are a public nuisance.

It's actually nothing to do with the sex, it's to do with their attitude towards racism

In Guangzhou once I saw a big banner that said "Welcome big-nose friends". I asked my Chinese friend what it was about and she said 'that's what we call westerners.'

Hilarious. No offence taken. People have different physical characteristics - it's not racist to recognise that. These lads are not racist. They surely found the girl's eyes attractive, which is why the girls were there. It's clear enough that the language was used in a faux-rough way for the ears of the other lads, because that is a laddish method of peer-bonding. There was also some subtle British class mockery. One of the lads was imitating a posh voice, and the 'slit-eye' phrase was made famous by the Duke of Edinburgh and now serves as a parody of colonial arrogance. Society needs to show a lot more emotional intelligence in understanding these things.

The papers played up the racism thing in order to justify showing the video, and they wanted to do that because of the public's prurient interest in sex. If the Briish public weren't so damn childish and "oooh matron" about sex, this would never have even made the newspapers.

You may well be right about the media. However the racist abuse is what concerned the football authorities and was the main reason for their action.

[Bezdomny]

When football players fall from level of their ego to level of their IQ level they get killed.

[rwdrwdrwd]

Firstly their lives aren't "ruined" they will get a contract elsewhere.

Secondly, they were on a business trip, this wasn't their down time.

Thirdly this isn't really about 'sex', everyone does it. It's about the way they acted, not the action that occurred.

As a Leicester fan - good riddance.

Wrong, wrong and wrong.

They will suffer for this for the rest of their lives, in untold ways, public and private. I wouldn't blame them if they are currently feeling suicidal.

People have down time on business trips - especially on business trips, because business trips are exhausting. Anyway, the public outcry had little to do with the fact that this was a business trip.

If you know anything about British society, you'll know this is all about sex. The racism thing was blown-up by the papers as an excuse for showing the video because "Reserve Team Footballers Have Sex With Prostitutes" wasn't in itself sufficient justification to show it, and by god, the papers wanted to cash in on this.

As a Leicester City fan you should support your players on the pitch and get out of their private lives.

I support my team, not these three specific players. It is absolutely best for the team that they go, they bought disgrace on the club. Getting rid was absolutely the right decision and was demanded by the vast majority of fans.

I don't give a toss if they feel bad, they deserve to feel bad - perhaps next time they won't treat another human being like shit. And I am sure that they will rightly remember the episode for the rest of their lives. This does not mean that their 'lives are ruined'. That's just b0770cks.

Yes people have downtime on business trips, but if they choose to spend that downtime racially abusing skint women, and mocking them whilst demanding that they 'eat my shit', then I suspect most organisations would sack them, in the event they were idiotic enough to distribute a video of themselves doing so.

Good <deleted> riddance.

[bannork]

Good to see the low life soi dogs of Leicester forced to move on, even though one is the son of the manager

It took a while to drive them out, perhaps the owner of the soi invited the dogs in in the first place, offering them chicken legs and breasts, but fellow residents in the soi couldn't stand their barking and slobbering, so even he was forced to kick them out.

[Beetlejuice]

Disgusting. Why on earth should they lose their livelihoods because of something they did in their own time which had nothing to do with their ability to do their job? They can still kick a ball just as well as they did before.

(BTW, I'm not condoning their behaviour at all, which was also disgusting.)

Shame that you and many others just can`t grasp the situation in your minds.

Usually people would not give a bunch of young lads indulging in a sex session with prostitutes a second thought. In fact if it were me, most of my mates would have laughed and said; you lucky so en so. But if people commit an act that discredits their employers and mars the reputation of a profession and a country they represent, then they deserve to be ousted.

It`s not what they done but how they done it that brought these actions against them. Only the feeble minded would not understand the reasons behind the decisions to sack these football players today.

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

Darn!!! And here I was expecting this trio was going to be transferred to "inactive positions" somewhere on their club or maybe at King Power!

Bet those guys really wish they were playing for a real Thai team right about now... Surely they would have fared much better.

[Nick167]

TAlk about hypocrisy...why should these lads be punished. We all know whats in thailand and wahst its famous for and when for the sake of monies, people with no self respect and dignity are willing to be humilated sexually in videos...so what? The whores should be arrested for selling and the police should be punished for not preventing whores form selling.

[soihok]

TAlk about hypocrisy...why should these lads be punished. We all know whats in thailand and wahst its famous for and when for the sake of monies, people with no self respect and dignity are willing to be humilated sexually in videos...so what? The whores should be arrested for selling and the police should be punished for not preventing whores form selling.

Read post #114

[brewsterbudgen]

TAlk about hypocrisy...why should these lads be punished. We all know whats in thailand and wahst its famous for and when for the sake of monies, people with no self respect and dignity are willing to be humilated sexually in videos...so what? The whores should be arrested for selling and the police should be punished for not preventing whores form selling.

Read post #114

He'd be well advised to read the whole thread before commenting.

[sjbrownderby]

Another very important point has been missed by most here. It may not seem so but prostitution is illegal in Thailand so they were all complicit in illegal activity which then was broadcast on social media. It happened in Thailand on an end of season tour by a football team owned and sponsored by Thais. A minor shirt sponsor is the Tourism Authority of Thailand which promotes the wholesome side of tourism here so for the TAT it must have come as a huge blow and a massive loss of face to the owners of the club.

I am sure that the time between the three being sent home and their sacking was not so much spent in investigating the incident as it was finding a way of sacking them with no legal repercussions as I am sure that the owners were deeply embarrassed and could not wait to get rid of them in order to salvage their own reputations here.

[Seastallion]

.....

Seriously! So you know what goes on behind closed doors and are IN-TOUCH with the people of the world's preferences on sexual behavior? I believe I stand by my reply before. Get real OK.

You are the one who claims violence and abusive language are common! How can you make that claim???

[Seastallion]

Disgusting. Why on earth should they lose their livelihoods because of something they did in their own time which had nothing to do with their ability to do their job? They can still kick a ball just as well as they did before.

(BTW, I'm not condoning their behaviour at all, which was also disgusting.)

Shame that you and many others just can`t grasp the situation in your minds.

Usually people would not give a bunch of young lads indulging in a sex session with prostitutes a second thought. In fact if it were me, most of my mates would have laughed and said; you lucky so en so. But if people commit an act that discredits their employers and mars the reputation of a profession and a country they represent, then they deserve to be ousted.

It`s not what they done but how they done it that brought these actions against them. Only the feeble minded would not understand the reasons behind the decisions to sack these football players today.

I do agree with you....but it segwes to a common theme that people find annoying about Thailand...that of face. These boys brought disrepute to the club, the club sacked them....where have we heard that sort of reaction to disrepute before?