Jump to content

No extension for fishing deadlines: EU


webfact

Recommended Posts

IUU
No extension for deadlines: EU

BANGKOK: -- The European Commission has dismissed as "without foundation" a claim that Thailand has been given more time by the European Union to tackle illegal fishing practices or IUU, reported Eureporter online on Tuesday.


The commission was referring to reports that quoted Thai government spokesman Sansern Kaewkamnerd as saying that Bangkok would be allowed to go beyond the initial deadline of October in taking the necessary corrective measures.

In April, the EU yellow-carded the country's fishing industry giving it six months to improve its IUU situation or face a potentially crippling ban on seafood imports into the EU.

Sansern claimed last week that the EU had extended the deadline, adding, "The prime minister is glad that the EU understands the Thai government's intentions and is allowing it to continue to solve the problem."

But on September 21, a Commission spokesman told this online that such claims were "without foundation."

Iris Petsa, press offficer for the Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Directorate in the Commission, said, "Reports about an extension are unfounded. No decision has been taken to date by the Commission on whether or not to give an extension to Thailand."

She added, "The dialogue with Thailand is on-going and the commission is working on a permanent basis with the Thai authorities. This period is coming to an end at the end of October for Thailand."

She said that Thailand had been engaged since April 2015 in the "dialogue process" with the commission and had been given six months to "negotiate with the executive and address its problems."

The EU had previously denounced the country's shortcoming in its fisheries monitoring, control and sanctioning systems.

The commission says that should the situation not improve the EU could resort to issuing a "red card", in other words banning fisheries imports from Thailand.

Spanish centre right MEP Gabriel Mato, a Fisheries Committee member and former rapporteur for the Parliament on illegal fishing, is among those who supports the EU's tough stance against Thailand, saying he supported a red card if the situation does not improve.

Meanwhile a senior MEP has reiterated the EU's usage of conditionality for democracy promotion.

Under the policy, any trade agreements between the EU and third countries are linked to issues of human rights and democracy.

For 20 years, the EU's trade agreements have included human rights clauses requiring the parties to these agreements to respect human rights and democratic principles.

Since the military coup in Thailand in May 2014, the EU has suspended fledgling negotiations with Thailand on the bilateral Free Trade Agreement, commenced in 2013.

The EU also refused to sign the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement finalised in November 2013, saying it will not be signed "until a democratically elected government is in place."

On the conditionality issue, German Christian Democrat MEP Werner Langen, who chairs the European Parliament's ASEAN delegation, said: "Democracy, rule of law and the protection of human rights remain a high priority for the EU and in particular in the work of the European Parliament.

"Hence, the EU is keen to co-operate with ASean on the promotion and protection of international human rights standards. This said there is still a lot of work to do. The European Union believes in the universal character of human rights, and as such, it is a pillar of our foreign policy action."

The MEP added, "In this regard, the EU aims at strengthening the dialogue with civil society organisations and non-state actors in the Asean region. We in the European Parliament will continue to look very carefully at the human rights situation.

"As in the past, human rights questions will be considered when it comes to deciding on Free Trade Agreements and Partnership and Cooperation Agreements."

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/No-extension-for-deadlines-EU-30269447.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-09-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Sansern claimed last week that the EU had extended the deadline, adding, "The prime minister is glad that the EU understands the Thai government's intentions and is allowing it to continue to solve the problem."

If a politician's mouth is moving he is lying.

Edited by jaywalker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of people that think that EU bureaucrats are somehow noble and honourable is quite amusing to behold. The fact that the article alludes to continuing ''negotiations'' shows that the show of ''force'' is just to appease the masses. October will come, Thais will continue there illegal practises and the EU will NOT issue a red.

Edited by SABloke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The commission was referring to reports that quoted Thai government spokesman Sansern Kaewkamnerd as saying that Bangkok would be allowed to go beyond the initial deadline of October in taking the necessary corrective measures.

But on September 21, a Commission spokesman told this online that such claims were "without foundation."

Khun Sansern is just laying the foundations for the upcoming "misunderstanding" plea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The prime minister is glad that the EU understands the Thai government's intentions"

Those intentions may be the reason for the EU to not allow the Thai government an extension. The EU understands what kind of government it is dealing with and its profound record on human rights abuses.

For the EU the reduction or loss of Thai seafood imports will have little affect on EU economy. Seafood exporters such as China, India, Indonesia, and Vietnam (#1, #2, #3 and #6 world ranking 2014 respectfully) will no doubt be pleased to replace Thailand's exports. Russia is a net exporter of seafood and does not need Thailand's seafood imports. Thailand's remaining market for seafood growth would be Africa - hardly a high value market.

Prayut should be very concerned for the economic security of Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of people that think that EU bureaucrats are somehow noble and honourable is quite amusing to behold. The fact that the article alludes to continuing ''negotiations'' shows that the show of ''force'' is just to appease the masses. October will come, Thais will continue there illegal practises and the EU will NOT issue a red.

Unfortunately I think you're right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The commission was referring to reports that quoted Thai government spokesman Sansern Kaewkamnerd as saying that Bangkok would be allowed to go beyond the initial deadline of October in taking the necessary corrective measures.

But on September 21, a Commission spokesman told this online that such claims were "without foundation."

Khun Sansern is just laying the foundations for the upcoming "misunderstanding" plea.

Or more likely, demanding that the EU show up for an attitude adjustment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter who is in government, the Democrats, PTP or any Thaksin proxy, or even the military in a Junta. There is always consistency. Government spokesmen make statements attributed to foreign countries, governments or leaders that are really just wishful thinking or figments of their imagination.

And, as with all forms of authority here, everyone is expected to simply believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares about EU, China and North Korea will be Thailand's future partners anyway.....

You have identified yourself as one who has never owned or managed a business.

The point that I'm making is that the ruling elite in Thailand couldn't care less about what some nosy EU officials thinks.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Thais jumped the gun and announced a promise before they were supposed to do so.

I do not see a red card coming, from the EU or the US because....the EU and US businesses would lose short term cash.

Suthep did the same thing when he admitted the coup had been planned for months before it happened.

My cynicism is well earned. I paid for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of people that think that EU bureaucrats are somehow noble and honourable is quite amusing to behold. The fact that the article alludes to continuing ''negotiations'' shows that the show of ''force'' is just to appease the masses. October will come, Thais will continue there illegal practises and the EU will NOT issue a red.

EU bureaucrats are far from noble. Every politician is.

Yet when is the last time you saw a beach look like Pattaya replete with tons of garbage & jet ski scams day in and day out, in Europe?

I abhor most governments, and I'm no tree-hugger either.

Game and Fish regulations I do agree with 100% though.

Edited by jaywalker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter who is in government, the Democrats, PTP or any Thaksin proxy, or even the military in a Junta. There is always consistency. Government spokesmen make statements attributed to foreign countries, governments or leaders that are really just wishful thinking or figments of their imagination.

And, as with all forms of authority here, everyone is expected to simply believe it.

And the Thai press is complicit in these deceits. Official statements are simply transcribed and rarely challenged. The officials are not called to account for their fabrications. Being a journalist in Thailand must be a life of constant under- achievement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Thai government's tendency to speak for others with a forked tongue nothwithstanding, anyone who believes the crap about human rights and democracy in the Op is a looney.

Human rights: China, Saudi Arabia, Israel etc etc are all business partners of the EU.

Democracy: Saudi & China again, Egypt, Vietnam etc etc are open to EU & foreign businesses.

As for a Spanish MEP supporting the EU - total hypocrisy, as Spain still has one of the biggest trawler fleets that has over fished the Miditerranean, North Sea & North Atlantic for years.

I go with the no red card side as Europe itself has never resolved IUU in it's own & international waters. The only good feature is that it has eliminated Shanghai-ing of people to serve as slaves on boats.

Edited by khunken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...