Jump to content

Russia, US sign deal to minimize risks in Syrian skies


webfact

Recommended Posts

Russia, US sign deal to minimize risks in Syrian skies
By ROBERT BURNS

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. and Russia put into practice on Tuesday new rules designed to minimize the risk of air collisions between Russian and U.S.-led coalition aircraft over Syria.

A Russian defense official in Moscow said the "memorandum of understanding" suggests a potential for U.S.-Russian counterterrorism cooperation, but U.S. officials said it was a narrow arrangement that does not lessen Washington's concern about the Russian military campaign in Syria.

There is no plan to establish zones of cooperation in the parallel air campaigns or to share intelligence or target information in Syria, Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said.

The Pentagon has cited several instances when Russian aircraft came too close to U.S. warplanes over Syria in recent weeks. More broadly, Washington has complained that instead of hitting Islamic State fighters, Russian airstrikes are mostly targeting rebel forces fighting the Syrian government. Russia also deployed ground troops and land-based weaponry, including multiple-launch rocket systems, in support of the Syrian government.

The arrangement announced Tuesday "does nothing to assuage our concerns about Russian military activities in Syria," State Department spokesman John Kirby said.

Cook said Gen. Lloyd Austin, commander of U.S. Central Command, signed for the U.S. side Tuesday. At a Pentagon news conference, Cook gave a broad description of the document but said the U.S. had accepted a Russian request that the text be kept secret.

After several rounds of talks that began more than a week ago, the two sides agreed to a number of air safety protocols including "maintaining professional airmanship" and the use of specific aircraft communications frequencies, Cook said. They agreed to keep a "safe distance" between aircraft, Cook said, but he would not say whether specific distances were written into the memo.

The two sides also agreed to establish a "communication line on the ground" as a backup of military-to-military communication, Cook said, although he would not say whether this would be a telephone line or where it would be located. A U.S.-Russia working group will be formed to deal with any implementation issues that arise, he added.

The discussions that led to the protocols "do not constitute U.S. cooperation or support for Russia's policy and actions in Syria," Cook said. "In fact, far from it, we continue to believe that Russia's strategy in Syria is counterproductive, and their support for the Assad regime will only make Syria's civil war worse." He was referring to Syrian President Bashar Assad, whom the U.S. says is an illegitimate leader and must leave office.

The U.S. has been bombing Islamic State targets in Syria since September 2014; the Russian air campaign began less than one month ago.

In Moscow, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said in a statement carried by Russian news agencies that signing the memorandum was a positive step that has "important practical meaning."

"The memorandum contains a complex of rules and restrictions aimed at preventing incidents between Russian and U.S. aircraft," Antonov said, adding that Russian and U.S. military officials will set up round-the-clock communications channels and "determine the mechanism of interaction, including mutual assistance in crisis situations."

"The Americans have promised to get the agreed rules to all participants of the anti-IS coalition they lead, so that their pilots proceed from those agreements," he said, referring to the U.S. coalition that includes Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.

Antonov added that the memorandum "shows a big potential for cooperation between Russia and the U.S., including in the fight against terrorism, which we are ready to expand and deepen."
___

Associated Press writer Vladimir Isachenkov in Moscow contributed to this report.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-10-21

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Something signed isn't going to preclude jets engaging. Inside each jet is a person. Each person has emotions and a quirky thing called a brain - which has thoughts that zip around like a chainsaw powered by jet fuel. Ok, pilots are trained to be cool headed, but shit can still happen. With two 22 million dollar fighter jets, the reverberations could affect the whole Middle East. Even at the best of times, the Middle East is a rats nest. I recommend the US stay focused on Iraq and Afghanistan. They're both basket cases, but not as bad off as Syria - particularly now that Russia is tossing bombs into the bonfire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Russian and American diplomacy can be amazing at times. Just when you think both countries are at each other's throats in a Big Boy contest, they make mutual agreements as if long time friends. The same between China and the USA.

This seemingly turbulent diplomatic behavior among superpowers is something developing nations like Thailand need to understand, albeit beyond their capacity to exercise.

Nations can have serious disagreements, misunderstandings and outright hostility but when there can be mutual benefits, practical diplomacy is best served hot. What is "practical?" Sometimes it is merely giving up the inconsequential for the necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The US and Russia don't have to be bosom buddies for such an agreement. It's just practical sense. The main tenets are probably something along the lines:

>>> When one side plans a sortie, they let the other side know.

>>> No target lock-on by one side on the other - which probably entails knowing some of the electronic signal codes (for ID'ing a 'friend') from the other side. No big deal. Codes can be changed later.

If either side gets a pilot shot down, it will be a promo bonanza for ISIS if he's caught by them. Let's hope that doesn't happen. There may also be a provision to help the other side (search and rescue) in that scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...