EU roasts Starbucks, slams Fiat Chrysler over 'illegal' tax deals

[webfact]

EU roasts Starbucks, slams Fiat Chrysler over ‘illegal’ tax deals



LUXEMBOURG: -- Starbucks and Fiat Chrysler should pay back between 20 and 30 million euros in taxes after the European Commission ruled on Wednesday that illegal tax deals unfairly reduced how much they had to pay.

Starbucks struck a tax agreement with the Netherlands, whilst Fiat had a similar accord with Luxembourg.

EU competition officials say the Dutch subsidiary of the coffee chain paid only €600,000 in taxes last year; the finance arm of the Italian-American carmaker paid just €400,000.

The Luxembourg deal was brokered in 2012 when European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker was prime minister of the country.

“I don’t really speculate that much about the past. I think the case what we do can change the future to make sure that every company contribute with their fair share of taxes,” said Margrethe Vestager, the EU commissioner for competition.

“So there are not only some companies, but all companies actually contribute. And looking forward and working with the parliament and with the member states I think we can achieve that.”

A group of investigative journalists published a report one year ago detailing the number of ‘sweetheart’ tax deals agreed under Juncker’s premiership of the Grand Duchy.

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists said that 340 companies benefited from such arrangements during his 18-year tenure.

“Unfortunately, it’s naive to think that today’s decision will make all multinational corporations start paying their taxes out of fear of getting caught by the Commission,” said Tove Ryding, Coordinator of Tax Justice at the European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad).

“It’s obviously still worth the risk to try and avoid taxes, when the worst that can happen is that a few of them get caught and have to pay their taxes, while the rest of them can continue enjoying a free ride.”

Both the Netherlands and Luxembourg said they disputed the Commission’s ruling.

Starbucks plans to appeal. Fiat denies the agreement amounted to state aid.

The EU executive is still investigating similar deals agreed by Apple and Amazon.


-- (c) Copyright Euronews 2015-10-22

[DennisF]

Should pay back???

More evidence that the EU is not fit for purpose.

Big mouths' and no power, being paid a fortune to do nothing.

[elgordo38]

Quote It’s obviously still worth the risk to try and avoid taxes, when the worst that can happen is that a few of them get caught and have to pay their taxes, while the rest of them can continue enjoying a free ride.” unquote. Need I say more? Banks are cheating to only in a different manner and receiving a slap on the wrist and then its business as usual. Its a tax lottery only the winner looses a little. Worth the risk.? Definitely. As Leona Helmsley famous statement said "Only the little people pay taxes"

[Jonmarleesco]

'Starbucks plans to appeal.' There's a surprise. 'The EU executive is still investigating similar deals agreed by Apple and Amazon.'

Well, I imagine there is little chance of Cameron and Osborne doing their duty and ensuring that Starbucks, Amazon, et al, pay their due UK taxes, even if not looking happy. But then, an even EU playing field should mean the UK government being compelled to revisit its cosy corporate tax deals.

[DennisF]

'Starbucks plans to appeal.' There's a surprise. 'The EU executive is still investigating similar deals agreed by Apple and Amazon.'

Well, I imagine there is little chance of Cameron and Osborne doing their duty and ensuring that Starbucks, Amazon, et al, pay their due UK taxes, even if not looking happy. But then, an even EU playing field should mean the UK government being compelled to revisit its cosy corporate tax deals.

Agreed , but then neither Cameron nor Osborne are fir for purpose either.

There should be a warehouse where we can return faulty politicians but, the local taxes would be too high for such a large place.

[GinBoy2]

I'm always baffled by the 'outrage' expressed in the European press, and I have to admit I only read the British & Spanish media, but especially the British I find scream bloody murder about US corporations basing themselves in Ireland for tax purposes and not paying UK tax.

Who wrote the tax laws allowing them to do that? You may not like it, but the companies just take advantage of the tax structures that are set up. I have no real idea, and don't really care very much, if it's an EU issue or national governments, but rather than have your press berate the companies, scream at your politicians...they wrote the laws!

Edited October 22, 2015 by GinBoy2