webfact Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Uighurs, set to be indictedThe Nation Corrections officials yesterday accompany the two prime suspects in the double bombings in Bangkok in August to the Military Court to seek their further detention. Out front is Meiraili Yusufu, followed by Bilal Muhammed.BANGKOK: -- THE MILITARY Court's prosecutors are expected to next week indict two suspects accused of involvement in the two bomb explosions in Bangkok in August, the lawyer of one of the suspects said yesterday.Kanchai Choochart, representing Bilal Muhammed, 24, said he would outline the defence plan when the prosecutors indicted his client.He was speaking at the Military Court after his client and Meiraili Yusufu, 26, were taken from special detention at a military base to the court so the authorities could seek permission to further detain the suspects. Police identified them as Chinese Uighurs.The court agreed to the request, meaning police can keep them detained until Tuesday. The prosecutors have to decide within that period whether to indict them.The lawyer said that prosecutors did not indict his client yesterday because there were many complicated documents to review.The lawyer said that prosecutors did not indict his client yesterday because there were many complicated documents to review.Police have charged the duo with many offences, including multiple murders, illegal entry and possessing of weapons without a permit.The Erawan Shrine blast in Bangkok on August 17 killed 20 people, mostly foreigners, and injured many others.No one was wounded in the blast at a pier on Chao Phraya River the following day.Bilal was arrested at an apartment in Bangkok's Nong Chok district, while Meiraili was found trying to sneak into Cambodia at Sa Kaew province.Bilal has confessed to assembling explosives that caused death and injury, Kanchai said, adding that he did not know what charges the prosecutors would use to indict the suspects.Meiraili is represented by another lawyer.Both suspects were taken to the court yesterday amidst tight security and they showed no emotion.Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Bangkok-bomb-suspects-identified-as-Uighurs-set-to-30272807.html-- The Nation 2015-11-13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davehowden Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 "The lawyer said that prosecutors did not indict his client yesterday because there were many complicated documents to review." Mmmmmmmmmmm, must be difficult being in the spotlight an all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 i found highly suspect that these people are prosecuted by a military court. Does uncle Too have something to hide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod reborn Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 They have a good defense, thanks to Somyot. Just blame that fictional character "Aod". Yeah, he's the guy that was responsible for the last 3 bombings in Bangkok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennypowers Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Is this still not being treated as a terrorist attack? What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
car720 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 I am not condoning in the slightest what has been done, however, from this picture and having lived in China I will say that it is a good thing that the Tibetans are not a revengeful lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horseman Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLang Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Confessions in a 'safe-house' with no witnesses, legal team or recordings, then military court, that's the way to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nowisee Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Sam Harris explains why Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwikeith Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' The protection of tourism is paramount in this instance even though it may well look like an act of terror to most who have attained the age to be able to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 i found highly suspect that these people are prosecuted by a military court. Does uncle Too have something to hide? If tried in a criminal court the defendets would be entitled to time-consuming due process including appeal rights. It seems the Junta prefers delivering justice quickly through military courts having no appeal even if it means violating human rights. Military trials are also not subject to public disclosures and information is far more controlled than with criminal courts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToS2014 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Is this still not being treated as a terrorist attack? What a joke. Interestingly, the majority Han Chinese consider the Uighurs a terrorist threat. What about the 20+ that were captured in Afghanistan and later detained in Gitmo? What about the increasing ties to the Uighurs movement to other known terrorist groups? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louse1953 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Sam Harris explains why Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Do Christians get identified by religion when they bomb and murder people.It should be Chinese Uighers.Maybe Chinese is the word they are scared of using. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
springheeled jack Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 at last we now know the nationality of these two they are Chinese uighurs and I have always maintained they have been fitted up for the shrine bombing . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThailandLOS Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Asswipes, hang 'em high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoon Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Because it's axiomatic (I hope you can understand that word) that a Uighur is a Muslim. If you had taken the trouble to find out who Uighurs are, where they come from, and their history of occupation by the Chinese, you would know that. Edited November 13, 2015 by Enoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horseman Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Because it's axiomatic (I hope you can understand that word) that a Uighur is a Muslim. If you had taken the trouble to find out who Uighurs are, where they come from, and their history of occupation by the Chinese, you would know that. lol .. i am sure I am not the only one on here that does not know that or what axiomatic means .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linky Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Because it's axiomatic (I hope you can understand that word) that a Uighur is a Muslim. If you had taken the trouble to find out who Uighurs are, where they come from, and their history of occupation by the Chinese, you would know that. lol .. i am sure I am not the only one on here that does not know that or what axiomatic means .. Its an Irish atomatic axe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesimps Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) at last we now know the nationality of these two they are Chinese uighurs and I have always maintained they have been fitted up for the shrine bombing .Horse crap.It was obvious from the start it was Uighurs. Edited November 13, 2015 by jesimps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phycokiller Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 so these are the guys were upset that their human trafficking business had been closed down? I rather doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAG Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 i found highly suspect that these people are prosecuted by a military court. Does uncle Too have something to hide? If tried in a criminal court the defendets would be entitled to time-consuming due process including appeal rights. It seems the Junta prefers delivering justice quickly through military courts having no appeal even if it means violating human rights. Military trials are also not subject to public disclosures and information is far more controlled than with criminal courts. If a trial process avoids " time consuming die process", has no appeal rights, avoids the need for public disclosure and violates human rights I really don't think it can be described as delivering justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johng Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 If a trial process avoids " time consuming die process", has no appeal rights, avoids the need for public disclosure and violates human rights I really don't think it can be described as delivering justice. " time consuming die process" is that some sort of Freudian slip ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAG Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 If a trial process avoids " time consuming die process", has no appeal rights, avoids the need for public disclosure and violates human rights I really don't think it can be described as delivering justice. " time consuming die process" is that some sort of Freudian slip ?? F F S - fat Finger Syndrome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brer Fox Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 IMHO these two were merely pawns in some much deeper plot. They were commissioned to do a job and carried it out and paid accordingly. They would be far removed from the big boys and would not have a clue who they were really working for. Anyway it is now all done and dusted and the reward/s have been paid out and the big boss has retired in a blaze of glory. Nothing left to do now except to stitch up these two and forget about it all. Thai justice wins again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wvavin Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Difficult to pity or pardon due to so many fatal victims. They have to be sent to the gallows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linky Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Difficult to pity or pardon due to so many fatal victims. They have to be sent to the gallows. Would you like a trial first or just accept the police story and off with their heads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
car720 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 i found highly suspect that these people are prosecuted by a military court. Does uncle Too have something to hide? If tried in a criminal court the defendets would be entitled to time-consuming due process including appeal rights. It seems the Junta prefers delivering justice quickly through military courts having no appeal even if it means violating human rights. Military trials are also not subject to public disclosures and information is far more controlled than with criminal courts. and it is how their Chinese masters would do it and would want it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDGRUEN Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) Sam Harris explains why Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Do Christians get identified by religion when they bomb and murder people.It should be Chinese Uighers.Maybe Chinese is the word they are scared of using. No Christians do not - because any Christian who does such an act is not doing it to defend Christianity nor to further it ... said another way -- no religious motivation or involvement ... More of a happenstance than anything else. Edited November 13, 2015 by JDGRUEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 i found highly suspect that these people are prosecuted by a military court. Does uncle Too have something to hide? If tried in a criminal court the defendets would be entitled to time-consuming due process including appeal rights. It seems the Junta prefers delivering justice quickly through military courts having no appeal even if it means violating human rights. Military trials are also not subject to public disclosures and information is far more controlled than with criminal courts. and it is how their Chinese masters would do it and would want it done. in others words they might be innocent as well! I wonder if Andy Hall do have free time, 2 another scapegoats need his help... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithathome Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Why does the heading not say: Bangkok bomb suspects, identified as Muslim Uighurs, set to be indicted why is everyone scared of printing the word Muslim and tell it how it is? my post will probably get removed as racist and again thats how it is ' Because it's axiomatic (I hope you can understand that word) that a Uighur is a Muslim. If you had taken the trouble to find out who Uighurs are, where they come from, and their history of occupation by the Chinese, you would know that. lol .. i am sure I am not the only one on here that does not know that or what axiomatic means .. Or Uighurs ! (but axiomatic - YES for me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
.thumb.png.76be522b3b43e7458166b9dac9e422ed.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now