kotsak Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 This is a travesty, it's a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwak250 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 This is a bit like being charged for wearing a seatbelt or in possesion of condoms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneday Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Number one country in shooting themselves in the foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooo Upto Me Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 This country is getting more crazier by the day, Thainess at its best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exbikey Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Number one country in shooting themselves in the foot. Is the possession of bulletproof footwear legal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nullx8 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 so you Can have a Gun in your house to "protect yourself" but you cant protect yourself outside our house with protective gear ? well it makes "some" sense, you can shoot anyone get to your house, but the one comes to your house must be able to be shoot guess that makes certain Car's made in Germany while driving trough a Mob also "Armor" and therefor Illegal ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlQaholic Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 (edited) Seriously??? "considered weapons under Thai law"--- "I'm gonna stab you with my bulletproof vest" with the same kind of logic then, any car would be a weapon as well as a Water-Buffalo and a dog. And for the helmet...That explains why Thais are so reluctant to wear helmets whilst riding motorcycles... Edited November 18, 2015 by AlQaholic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebyrd Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Late 80's, early 90's, Thailand was my Shangri-La. Idiocy like this all too frequently was one of the reasons I left 10 years ago. Every time I think I've heard it all, something like this comes along. I hope the case will be dismissed, but let's not hold our breath.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantomfiddler Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 A ridiculous waste of taxpayers money, and an affront to personal freedom to wear whatever you please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlQaholic Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 (edited) I just checked, possession of bulletproof vests without a license ARE actually illegal in most countries, to prevent criminals easy access to protection, however the laws covering this are mostly separate from gun control laws, whereas in Thailand they just decided to define it as a weapon to achieve the same result. But on the other hand they should have looked away when this Journalist shows up with a vest, this should have never gone to court. Edited November 18, 2015 by AlQaholic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupermarineS6B Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Another mindless act of stupidity in La la land....... It's ok to go around murdering people on beaches, but for christs sake don't carry PROTECTIVE articles of clothing around with you to a site of a bombing in consideration that there might be a need for protection......... I really do hope Thailand drops this one, it's making the country look petty even for Thai standards....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmh8 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 One can only assume he has upset the military juntaship. Or amybe doing favours for China and this chap has written an article about the spratlyes or simialr What about we cponcentrate on important things, such as, oh I don't know, what about replanting the central barrier plants outside my house on the main road, surely someone important will be driving past some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCARLETIBIS1 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I honked my horn on my bike (one short beep) behind a red truck that had blocked the bike lane hoping he would move a little so I could pass. This was right past Kad Suan Keaw at the light going west during broad daylight. The driver who had passengers got out of the truck (small old guy with no teeth) with a foot long machete and starting shaking it at me and walking toward me. I aimed my big bike at the little bastard and said c'mon do it. He got back in the truck. Point is they all carry weapons and the police do nothing. This place is a joke in a thousand different ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCARLETIBIS1 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 So it's against the law to wear a motorcycle helmut but I get fined if I don't wear one? What's the problem with that kind of thinking? Makes sense to me. And of course a "journalist" with credentials is clearly a terrorist if he/she is covering a story where guns and bombs are going off. Amazing Thailand. Can you imagine if it becomes against the law here to pick your nose? The streets would become empty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newnative Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Just totally brainless. A warning to the journalist about Thai law would have been the right response in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mot Dang Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Well, I hope that they will find him guilty and jail him for life this terrorist...What? hang on a minute.. what was his 'crimes' ? possessing a bulletproof vest and a helmet? so all the Thai men going around with concealed weapons on them such guns, knifes and clubs in their cars and motorcycles, what they should be charged with? Another form of "Thainess", no bloody common sense. The police and courts are making such a noise on this one it will go on the world stage once the trial starts. Sure the vest and helmet are illegal, as in many other countries, but the guy is a journalist covering violent situations. Yes he should have registered them, but for heaven's sake, will the police please recognize the triviality here, give him a heavy fine and ship him out. If the guy had a bad hair-do, a motley beard, a prominent proboscis, and shouted "God is great" regularly, sure then throw him into the slammer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optad Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Thais expect that this guy will not come back. Thus they'll not have to jail him (which would be infamous) + the guy will remain the bad guy escaping "justice". He is a journalist. Cannot have travel bans. Besides he has moved from covering stories to being one. He will come back for this sham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optad Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 "Stupid is as stupid does" Forrest Gump You don't need to source that quote on TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keesters Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Thailand is not alone in making them illegal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletproof_vest#Legality IMO they should be legal for civilian use if not carrying a weapon. If you're a civilian carrying a weapon you are a villain or potential villain and don't deserve protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Najinsky Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 This "bullet-proof vest is a weapon" is clearly wrong, pretty much any non-thai can see this. But it seems the mentality exists in other areas too. I have another example, not in the same league as this for seriousness, but an equal match in stupidity. My local supermarket. They keep the Soda water stocked on the same shelves as the alcohol. When my friend tried to buy a box of soda water during the alcohol prohibited times (about 3'o clock I think) he was told at the cash register that he couldn't buy it because of the time. He protested that it wasn't alcohol, but was told it was stocked on the alcohol shelf so he couldn't buy it. My friend bought some soda water from 7-11 instead, lets hope this poor victim of stupidity gets a simple and fair solution soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatsujin Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Such a ridiculous charge. This country has a lot to learn about civility. "This country has a lot to learn" more than suffices lol This whole case is insane to begin with and should never have gone this far. However, Thai's like to get their message out loud and clear (to their own) and really don't care what anyone else in the rest of the world thinks, and the tourist numbers prove that whatever they do (pretty much), people will still keep on coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optad Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I just checked, possession of bulletproof vests without a license ARE actually illegal in most countries, to prevent criminals easy access to protection, however the laws covering this are mostly separate from gun control laws, whereas in Thailand they just decided to define it as a weapon to achieve the same result. But on the other hand they should have looked away when this Journalist shows up with a vest, this should have never gone to court. This is the bit to ponder. You would figure that this law is a relic and needs amending. These jackets are outlawed for reasons to with encouraging urban militias, rightly or wrongly. But the authorities had a choice to charge or not, correct? Surely, this is a case where you don't charge and make the amendments the necessary for credentialed reporters, yes? That is positive legislative assembly at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GAZZPA Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 In Australia it's illegal to be in possession of a bulletproof vest too. But I have seen Australian journalists wearing them. So, I guess they need a license OR the Australian authorities are not stupid and have exceptions for journalists in the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Deerhunter Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Such a ridiculous charge. This country has a lot to learn about civility. not to mention common sense................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhizBang Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Cannot believe they are still proceeding with this. It would be much better for them to drop the charge, or at least let it quietly die. But TiT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigermoth Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 In Australia it's illegal to be in possession of a bulletproof vest too. It is only illegal if you don't have a license or are not in a profession that has reason to wear them, like journalists and others who may be involved in various threats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonaldBattles Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I have been here for 31 years and lived in 9 different provinces. Everything changes but nothing ever changes. Forget about the legal system as it is only to benefit those who control it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelHeather Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I need paracetamol on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyNo4 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 (edited) In Australia it's illegal to be in possession of a bulletproof vest too. Why? ....Seems governments don't want people to be able to protect themselves. It's every mans human right to be able to protect themselves, especially the way the world is heading now, with governments failing to protect their citizens. Edited November 18, 2015 by LuckyNo4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KamalaRider Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Amazing Thailand Police Officer can carry guns = no problem Journalists can carry protection against guns = problem you could not make it up! What's even more amazing is that foreigners will never be able to obtain a license for vest and helmet as we aren't allowed to obtain as protection as such are considered to be like guns, just because we are foreigner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now