Jump to content

Barclays fined 103m euros for failing to run checks on rich clients


Recommended Posts

Posted

Barclays fined 103m euros for failing to run checks on rich clients

post-247607-0-16211700-1448715221_thumb.

Barclays has been fined 72 million pounds (103 million euros) for failing to run proper checks on rich clients to prevent financial crime.

Britain’s markets watchdog the Financial Conduct Authority said the clients involved were “politically exposed” and should have brought enhanced monitoring.

But instead the bank fawned over them, taking them on as quickly as possible to generate nearly 75 million euros in revenue and contravening its own guidelines according to the watchdog.

The FCA said the failings related to a 1.88 billion pound (2.6 billion euros) transaction in 2011 and 2012 for several extremely rich clients.

Responding to the fine, Barclays noted that the FCA had not found that the bank had facilitated any financial crime in relation to the transaction.

euronews2.png
-- (c) Copyright Euronews 2015-11-28

Posted

Laundering money via the banks would be largely eliminated if the banks folllowed the proper rules and guidelines.

This in itself would be of great assistance in the fight against corruption going on around the world.

The fine is well and good if the money goes back to whence it came and to those that are deserving. But, slap those responsible for the lack of investigation in the slammer for few years and the fight against this type of inaction would be much easier and those who might be considering similar inaction, may think again.

Barclays may not have facilitated a financial crime , but made no apparent attempt to stop one taking place

Posted

More charges for the customer to pay to cover the loss of profits, in the meantime the culprits who perpetrated this don't get punished. Although a few might have to lose their jobs while being compensated with lottery type payouts.

Posted

Major US and European banks simply flaunt laws and regulations and consider the fines (tea money) they pay to be a cost of business and the people they screw in the process to be beneath their contempt (and those they screw rarely benefit from the penalties banks pay).

CFx10-9UIAAo0Ys.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...