Jump to content

Drink driving ban may be imposed during Songkran festival


webfact

Recommended Posts

What I can't understand is that if, and it is a very big IF, the police actually enforced all of the laws and made arrests and wrote tickets and really confiscated vehicles forever, the police would be RICH from the money collected from all of those things. 90% of drivers break traffic laws in one form or another. It is unimaginable the amount of money to be collected from the police really doing their jobs full time,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Positive results? More accidents, injuries and deaths during the first 5 of 7 dangerous days.

Precisely - Though I suspect the nature of the beast is thus:-

The mere thread of action was not enough to the hardy Thai - and no one believed that the police would follow through with the publiciised threats.

...and thus this year everyone just drink-drived as before.

However, NEXT YEAR (following all the very visible arrests and vehicle confiscations) we would expect to see the big improvement in drink drive figures.

What is interesting is the 10:1 standoff rate of vehicles impounded versus people arrested - how were so many able to escape without their vehicles taken off them whistling.gif

Regarding the 10:1 impound rate, it was suggested in another forum that maybe another driver took over -( hopefully after being tested) this shouldn't happen, the vehicle should be impounded as the driver was DUI, otherwise the impact of the impoundment is lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total ban is good for Songkran does this mean zero tolerance or under the limit ok?

Keep the random breath testing going as a permanent thing would be a further step forward.

Lowering the speed limit to 100km max would be another, enforcing it would be ten steps further ahead, more merit would be gained by placing a zero alcohol tolerance on all drivers under 21 with serious penalties if caught, like confiscation of bikes and vehicles permanently.

Then a serious road safety campaign, televised permanently as it is in NZ with road warning signs may be another twenty steps forward, I hope Mr Prayut reads this.

Then again fining vehicles and bikes and slapping a sticker on them that can only be removed by police if their vehicles have no lights or other dangerous faults are repaired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maj-Gen Sansern Kaewkamnerd, spokesman of the Government .........claimed that the unprecedented measure had enabled authorities to seize illegal items such as illegal firearms .....

More of a concern to me than the driving "habits" here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps something is lost in translation. I hope so because these press releases seem to confirm that those in charge of road safety are absolutely clueless.

The statistics, if they are to be believed, appear to confirm this too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO!!

The heavier enforcement should be a permanent feature not just at the 'dangerous' times.

Indeed Crossy, i'm at a loss to understand why this new brainwave wasn't thought up decades ago and seemingly only piloted 5 days ago. It should be a permanent fixture although the number of cars being taken is shockingly low, almost looks like they're just being allowed on their way as they're more difficult to pull in

Maybe they did not have the manpower to seize and transport all the vehicles. The lack of manpower is a big issue here. To many chiefs and not enough Indians. I agree with Crossy they should have monthly or weekly UNANNOUNCED spot checks and also as z42 says this is not rocket science as a deterrent just good policing. I think the government was a bit overwhelmed by the success and thus are "thinking" about using it for Songkran. We my g/f and I pour water over the statue at Tops market and that is it for us none of the Baccanalian nonsense that takes place in the streets . The word Songkran sends shivers up and down my spine 3 days of pure hellish music across the street. Not the sweet lyrical Thai music I like but just bombastic bass pounding away. Bing, Dean and Frank where are you?

Edited by elgordo38
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there thought that driving drunk was a law? So for these 2 holiday periods they will actually enforce that law. What about the rest of the laws and the rest of the year?

Also! If they were actually enforcing this law without prejudice to every person caught drunk driving! Then why did they only impound 2100 vehicles yet 23000 charges for drunk driving were made? Tea money collected maybe? It seems too many got through with only paying off the police and taking a ticket from them instead of impounding their vehicle like they were supposed to do.

I've no idea, but maybe there was a sliding scale for 'drunk driving'....but I would think that there may have been a second driver available (for a car) who was sober. Single drivers on bikes make have lost their vehicle. Would like to know how many hi class euro cars go impoundedlaugh.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Utter nonsense of course - they only impounded cars from people too skint to bribe them which is why the figure is so low- in a few weeks or so, we will no doubt have the annual debate on whether or not to close all the bars for Songkran - another round of nonsense discussion - it is of no consequence what laws they pass or what crackdowns they have if they are incapable of commanding sufficient respect to enforce the law and this lack of respect for the police is far and away from being a farang thing.

Reap what you sow...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there thought that driving drunk was a law? So for these 2 holiday periods they will actually enforce that law. What about the rest of the laws and the rest of the year?

Also! If they were actually enforcing this law without prejudice to every person caught drunk driving! Then why did they only impound 2100 vehicles yet 23000 charges for drunk driving were made? Tea money collected maybe? It seems too many got through with only paying off the police and taking a ticket from them instead of impounding their vehicle like they were supposed to do.

It was probably a combination of tea money and logistics...

Sometimes a checkpoint obly has 4 police....

If they to arrest someone and drive back to the station to book him and Park his vehicle that only leaves 3 men available...

Rinse and repeat....

How much room is there at the police station to park vehicles?

23,000 vehicles could block a town never mind a police station so maybe at some point they have to start fining them because the impounding is too impractical...

Edited by Ks45672
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...