Cologne attacks: First suspect held over sex assault claims

[webfact]

Cologne attacks: First suspect held over sex assault claims

COLOGNE: -- A 26-year-old Algerian asylum seeker has become the first suspect to be arrested over alleged sexual offences in Cologne on New Year's Eve.

The man, who has not been named, was detained at a refugee shelter in the town of Kerpen over the weekend, prosecutors say.

He was being held on suspicion of groping a woman and stealing her phone.

Full story: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35348949


-- BBC 2016-01-19

[jaidam]

I know somebody who's job it is to accompany deported "refugees" from a European country. He told me they fly on a chartered private jet, and when they land, the country never allows the deportee to enter, so they fly him back to Europe again on the chartered private jet. You could call it a bit of a waste of money. A big catapult would work better.

[simple1]

I know somebody who's job it is to accompany deported "refugees" from a European country. He told me they fly on a chartered private jet, and when they land, the country never allows the deportee to enter, so they fly him back to Europe again on the chartered private jet. You could call it a bit of a waste of money. A big catapult would work better.

Interesting, EU countries & Oz have successfully deported thousands of rejected refugees by air. Your acquaintance claims all are denied entry to their country of origin, can you confirm the country that has singularly failed in its deportation process..

An example…

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/aug/26/afghan-asylum-seekers-deported-uk-legal-battle-court-order

[jaidam]

I know somebody who's job it is to accompany deported "refugees" from a European country. He told me they fly on a chartered private jet, and when they land, the country never allows the deportee to enter, so they fly him back to Europe again on the chartered private jet. You could call it a bit of a waste of money. A big catapult would work better.

Interesting, EU countries & Oz have successfully deported thousands of rejected refugees by air. Your acquaintance claims all are denied entry to their country of origin, can you confirm the country that has singularly failed in its deportation process..

An example…

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/aug/26/afghan-asylum-seekers-deported-uk-legal-battle-court-order

Sorry I will not say which country he works for. I asked him why they can't just put them on a schedule flight. He said you wouldn't believe how they behave on an airplane. How so I asked, well for a start they piss and shit in their pants, spit, shout and scream. Sound like wonderful chaps, if a bit misunderstood hey?

[simple1]

I know somebody who's job it is to accompany deported "refugees" from a European country. He told me they fly on a chartered private jet, and when they land, the country never allows the deportee to enter, so they fly him back to Europe again on the chartered private jet. You could call it a bit of a waste of money. A big catapult would work better.

Interesting, EU countries & Oz have successfully deported thousands of rejected refugees by air. Your acquaintance claims all are denied entry to their country of origin, can you confirm the country that has singularly failed in its deportation process..

An example…

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/aug/26/afghan-asylum-seekers-deported-uk-legal-battle-court-order

Sorry I will not say which country he works for. I asked him why they can't just put them on a schedule flight. He said you wouldn't believe how they behave on an airplane. How so I asked, well for a start they piss and shit in their pants, spit, shout and scream. Sound like wonderful chaps, if a bit misunderstood hey?

Right, of course you cannot confirm the country that is completely unable to deport declined refugees by air, even though such arrangements are agreed at govt to govt level.

Edited January 19, 2016 by simple1

[evadgib]

More home truths from chairman Pat:

http://www.youtube.com/embed/TIfMAP4Q1yk?&rel=0

[Scott]

I know somebody who's job it is to accompany deported "refugees" from a European country. He told me they fly on a chartered private jet, and when they land, the country never allows the deportee to enter, so they fly him back to Europe again on the chartered private jet. You could call it a bit of a waste of money. A big catapult would work better.

Interesting, EU countries & Oz have successfully deported thousands of rejected refugees by air. Your acquaintance claims all are denied entry to their country of origin, can you confirm the country that has singularly failed in its deportation process..

An example…

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/aug/26/afghan-asylum-seekers-deported-uk-legal-battle-court-order

Sorry I will not say which country he works for. I asked him why they can't just put them on a schedule flight. He said you wouldn't believe how they behave on an airplane. How so I asked, well for a start they piss and shit in their pants, spit, shout and scream. Sound like wonderful chaps, if a bit misunderstood hey?

Deportations are handled differently depending on the situation. Some people can be deported by commercial flights, although this is not usually done. Some people do not contest it and are of no threat.

Deportations are handled gov't to gov't and the receiving gov't agrees to take the returnees. If the home country refuses, it is done before the person boards a flight. The most common reason for the destination country not taking someone is because they cannot verify that the person is actually a citizen.

Forced repatriations are generally handled in the same manner as a criminal being deported. It may be on a commercial flight or it may be chartered. I have seen people being forcibly repatriated where they were chained and shackled to their seats. I have never heard of a deportee being denied entry into the receiving country.

Deportation is an expensive process starting with the legal costs and ending with the number of people required to travel with deportees. For poorer countries, very often there is a payment to the home country to take them back. The amount varies, but the cost of getting the person settled is usually covered.

The article that Simple1 linked to is particularly disturbing. Unaccompanied minor children should have expedited screening and if they are to be deported, it should be done immediately. Children should not be separated from their families and reunification needs to be a priority. In years past, if a it was deemed to not be in the best interest of a child to be returned to the family, they are given a durable solution of resettlement, even though they might not meet refugee status criteria. They most certainly should not be allowed to remain until they are 18 and then deported. The exception might be if a child has not obtained citizenship and has committed a felony.