Norway sends migrants back to Russia

[webfact]

Migrant crisis: Norway begins deportations to Russia

OSLO: -- Norway has sent 13 migrants back to Russia under new rules expected to see thousands deported by bus, reports say.

About 5,500 people are due to be transported from Norway to Russia. Many crossed the Arctic border by bicycle as part of the influx of migrants to Europe in 2015.

Norway announced in November it would immediately deport people who had arrived from a country deemed safe.

Full story: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35355727


-- BBC 2016-01-20

[i claudius]

Can any of you imagine this happening in Britain , the left wing PC crowd would be out in force and anyone who did not agree with them would be arrested for a hate crime , we gave up long ago , the economic migrants can now even walk through the tunnel and get free board and lodgings and money to spend , meanwhile pensioners who paid in all their lives get shafted .

[SOTIRIOS]

...does it make more sense to accept desperate migrants....???

...'reject migrants from countries deemed safe'...

[bangon04]

Maybe the BBC will find a way to declare Russia as unsafe ......

Putin's treatment of the poor poor Ukrainians?

[connda]

Gotta be muslim to enter Scandinavian. Orthodox Christian Ruskies, back to Russia. What's wrong with this picture?

[mgjackson69]

Gotta be muslim to enter Scandinavian. Orthodox Christian Ruskies, back to Russia. What's wrong with this picture?

From the article: "...all those transported had either a valid Russian visa or other residence permit. ..."

So, not "Ruskies".

I did not find anything in the article that stated what country or countries those deported were from.

[Saradoc1972]

Went on hunger strike again, have we?

Where they come from they wouldn't even think of trying because nobody would think of bothering.

It's remarkable how every single one seems to have found out about "European values" and how to use them as a means of coercion.

Don't like Italian food, even if it's halal? Throw it away and point at your hungry children.

Macedonia closes the border with teargas and batons? Drive a crowd of women and children at them.

Police stops you? Simply walk past or start running, no need to heed warning shots. They won't use their guns on you.

Border police will only let Syrians pass? Keep the Syrians from going, remind the press of the worsening situation for the masses of people stuck.

Asylum rejected? Occupy a public place in protest and go on hunger strike till somebody comes to negotiate, like it was their fault if you suffer from that.

Or occupy an old school and threaten to set it alight or jump from the roof, like in Berlin. No snipers, no SWAT team, no nothing.

They must think we're stupid. And they are right.

[Saradoc1972]

Next level of perversion on a daily basis.

Can't get into Britain? Too many safe countries on the way you could (or rather: would have had to) claim asylum in under Dublin regulations?

Take a camping holiday in "The Jungle" near Calais. Sue Britain claiming Dublin III isn't working (well, granted that. But what's wrong with France or Austria?),

claim the Calais camp was "living hell" (granted, but that was a known fact BEFORE you moved there, which you did not need to do), you only spent

one night in the comfort of heated accommodation, and actually have them fetch you by court order.

The Guardian, 21.01.2015

I do not object to helping war refugees, those kids are actually Syrians. But there are laws, those are being made by an elected parliament, this is how democracy works.

What I wonder about is if it's actually laws determining what's going on or the courts (and I am perfectly aware that laws have to be interpreted, by courts), and who made

them the actual law-givers as this would seem, even if their rulings fly in the face of everything that had been decided on for and between countries in a deliberate process.

Edited January 21, 2016 by Saradoc1972