He was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder, and as far as has been reported, that allegation has not been downgraded nor dismissed. I'm not sure that has any real bearing on the situation. Whether they were parents or other guardians seems largely irrelevant. In the UK at least, in an environment like this, particularly when it isn't overcrowded, it's perfectly normal to allow a three-year-old a degree of freedom to wander, explore and investigate their surroundings while the adults remain a few metres behind, watching and supervising. That isn't negligence, it's simply how young children learn about the world around them. No reasonable parent expects to be protecting their child from a stranger suddenly picking them up and throwing them into a crocodile enclosure. Unless this individual had a documented history of violence or behaviour that would reasonably have led carers to believe he posed a danger to others, it seems quite a leap to start assigning blame to them. Having learning difficulties does not automatically make someone violent, nor does it place carers in a position where they can predict every unexpected act by an adult in their care. Indeed, but that in itself highlights the current temperature of the debate, shaped by a number of high-profile cases in recent years. Its no longer surprising that some people speculate about the background of suspects before the facts emerge. Whether those assumptions prove correct or not is another matter. The more telling observation is not that some guessed incorrectly, but that the same conclusion was 'jumped to' by a handful of people - perhaps the underlying reason for that is more telling.
Create an account or sign in to comment