webfact Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Victims of Sara Netanyahu’s 'abusive behaviour' win 39,000 eurosJERUSALEM: -- A man who was insulted and verbally abused by the wife of the Israeli Prime Minister has spoken out about his experience.A labour court in Jerusalem ruled that Sara Netanyahu’s angry outbursts and demands created an abusive work environment at the leader’s official residence.Meni Naftali and other former staff members were awarded 39,000 euros in damages.Naftali resigned in 2012 after a 20-month period working at the residence.Prior to the court ruling, the Prime Minister’s Office had dismissed the allegations as “evil, skewed gossip.”A separate accusation of abusive behaviour — dating back to 2010 — was settled out of court. -- (c) Copyright Euronews 2016-02-12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpinx Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Tip of the iceberg,,,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupatria Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 That explains their desperate need for fences. Don't let the Netanyahu’s out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reggaebkk Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 (edited) She should know better... she could bomb, burn, skin or torture as many Palestinians she wants, why would she bother insulting an israeli, that's highly forbidden, even among israelis... the elected people man, elected by oh my God!... don't mess with that... while genocidiing Arabs is recommended and sponsored... what was she thinking??? Edited February 12, 2016 by reggaebkk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidermike007 Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Birds of a feather, flock together. It figures that his wife would be as insane as he is. Or as lacking in compassion or humanity. This is an extreme man, who has been warmongering his entire career. It makes sense that he wife would be as out of touch, and as arrogant as the man himself is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgesAbitbol Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Bet he will be called Antisemitic soon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 I see our esteemed members are attempting to out do one another as to who can make the biggest presumption fallacy. I guess all of your interactions with the outside world can be deducted from the behavior of your wives or girlfriends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPI Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Bet he will be called Antisemitic soon... Well he fits the mold! He doesn't like Arabs for a start, aren't they semites as well?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgesAbitbol Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 I see our esteemed members are attempting to out do one another as to who can make the biggest presumption fallacy. I guess all of your interactions with the outside world can be deducted from the behavior of your wives or girlfriends. Birds of a feather flock together! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Money Bags Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 If I was able to collect 39,000 Euros for every d***head of a boss I ever had, I would be FAR richer. Oh, the opportunities lost...... You're Welcome!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 (edited) She should know better... she could bomb, burn, skin or torture as many Palestinians she wants, why would she bother insulting an israeli, that's highly forbidden, even among israelis... the elected people man, elected by oh my God!... don't mess with that... while genocidiing Arabs is recommended and sponsored... what was she thinking??? No obsessive Israel demonization here. No sirree. It's so predictable that any story touching on Israel, and this is a negative story about the wife of their PM and it doesn't surprise me that she's a handful, is seen as a call for OPEN SEASON for such odious over the top not to mention OFF TOPIC hate speech posts. Edited February 12, 2016 by Jingthing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Bet he will be called Antisemitic soon... Well he fits the mold! He doesn't like Arabs for a start, aren't they semites as well?? The term antisemitic refers specifically to Jews but if you aren't willing to accept established definitions, for you, just think Jew haters. Sorted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGImInPattaya Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 No suprise here...husband's a psychopath and the wife's a sociopath...make a nice couple really. Is this what Theodore Herzl had in mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgesAbitbol Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 Bet he will be called Antisemitic soon... Well he fits the mold! He doesn't like Arabs for a start, aren't they semites as well?? The term antisemitic refers specifically to Jews but if you aren't willing to accept established definitions, for you, just think Jew haters. Sorted. The terms "critic toward Israel politic" does not mean "jew hater" but if you aren't willing to accept established definitions.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 She should know better... she could bomb, burn, skin or torture as many Palestinians she wants, why would she bother insulting an israeli, that's highly forbidden, even among israelis... the elected people man, elected by oh my God!... don't mess with that... while genocidiing Arabs is recommended and sponsored... what was she thinking???No obsessive Israel demonization here. No sirree.It's so predictable that any story touching on Israel, and this is a negative story about the wife of their PM and it doesn't surprise me that she's a handful, is seen as a call for OPEN SEASON for such odious over the top not to mention OFF TOPIC hate speech posts. Pavlov's dogs are nothing if not consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostboy Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 I see our esteemed members are attempting to out do one another as to who can make the biggest presumption fallacy. I guess all of your interactions with the outside world can be deducted from the behavior of your wives or girlfriends. The OP states that the PM's Office dismissed the allegation as evil, skewed gossip. This raises it beyond the personal and into the realm of public policy and governance. Government resources pay for the functioning of the PM's Office. If they involve themselves in such a matter then it becomes a reflection of the Leadership both in tone and style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 (edited) I see our esteemed members are attempting to out do one another as to who can make the biggest presumption fallacy. I guess all of your interactions with the outside world can be deducted from the behavior of your wives or girlfriends. The OP states that the PM's Office dismissed the allegation as evil, skewed gossip. This raises it beyond the personal and into the realm of public policy and governance. Government resources pay for the functioning of the PM's Office. If they involve themselves in such a matter then it becomes a reflection of the Leadership both in tone and style. What husband isn't going to defend his wife, especially such a strong spirited woman as the lovely Sara, if they are to remain married? So yes public because it's the PM's wife, but also quite personal. Edited February 12, 2016 by Jingthing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostboy Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 A Prime Minister may defend his wife but he may not use the public purse to do so. This is corrupt behaviour. Further, the force of government was brought to bear on the complainant, whose allegations turned out to be true. This is also corrupt. Some may argue that it is defensible but I still believe it is corrupt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 (edited) A Prime Minister may defend his wife but he may not use the public purse to do so. This is corrupt behaviour. Further, the force of government was brought to bear on the complainant, whose allegations turned out to be true. This is also corrupt. Some may argue that it is defensible but I still believe it is corrupt. Well, if you're an Israeli citizen perhaps you can pursue these charges. Israel has taken legal action against high officials before, in recent history, even leading to incarceration. Otherwise, I don't see this as an important news story, except for it's gossip value and to advance the impression that Sarah Netanyahu may be a boss from hell. Edited February 12, 2016 by Jingthing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicog Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 So she's as revolting as her husband. Hardly news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 12, 2016 Share Posted February 12, 2016 (edited) It really could be much worse: Bibi was quite the Hebrew Hunk in his Israeli salad days: In any case, about this case, 39K Euros buys a boat load of yummy hummus but this scandal ain't exactly Watergate. It's more FUNNY than anything. Edited February 12, 2016 by Jingthing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGLV0121 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 (edited) It really could be much worse: nightmare.jpg Bibi was quite the Hebrew Hunk in his Israeli salad days: cutebibi.jpg In any case, about this case, 39K Euros buys a boat load of yummy hummus but this scandal ain't exactly Watergate. It's more FUNNY than anything. Reminds me of (Bill) Clinton's days when he was in hot water because of stains on Monika's dress, and Hillary supported her husband ;-/ DNA evidence is sometimes at the heart of comic situations. Sometimes. Edited February 16, 2016 by AGLV0121 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now