Boon Mee Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) ^^ Yup, more votes for the Donald generated every day Crooked Hillary is out there... Edited July 8, 2016 by Boon Mee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boon Mee Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 FBI Director Comey: If FBI Employees Did What Hillary Did They Would Be Fired, Clearance Revoked And they'd still be eligible to run for president. And be trusted with nuclear secrets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attrayant Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 FBI Director Comey: If FBI Employees Did What Hillary Did They Would Be Fired, Clearance Revoked And they'd still be eligible to run for president. And be trusted with nuclear secrets? You'll have to come up with something scarier than that, because the option is Donald being trusted with "nuclear secrets" (whatever those are). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 FBI Director Comey: If FBI Employees Did What Hillary Did They Would Be Fired, Clearance Revoked That is not what he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalf12 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 She is as corrupt as the day is long. She should be removed for standing for the Presidency. Better to get one of the Mafia boss's at least they would stop a lot of the violence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalf12 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 FBI Director Comey: If FBI Employees Did What Hillary Did They Would Be Fired, Clearance Revoked And they'd still be eligible to run for president. And be trusted with nuclear secrets? Being an industrialist he probably has a lot of experience of keeping secrets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgraham Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 I believe the appropriate term is "adding insult to injury". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 The stanch of a cover up stinks to high havens, if we to judge what happened to General David Petraeus who got prosecuted, find and dumped for much less of what Clinton is allegedly to have done, double stander you say? you bet ya...... Clearly you have no idea of what Petraeus did, which involved INTENT. Petraeus, stupidly in retrospect, admitted that what he did was wrong. Thus, intent. If you are going to require every criminal prosecution to depend on a confession of the crime from the criminal to prosecute him/her, then 99.9 percent of all crimes will go without a prosecution. No. Intent is there before the crime, not after.He stayed right up and explained himself very well. So what happened to "ignorance of the law is no excuse"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubonjoe Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 A off topic post that would of derailed the topic has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Clearly you have no idea of what Petraeus did, which involved INTENT. Petraeus, stupidly in retrospect, admitted that what he did was wrong. Thus, intent. If you are going to require every criminal prosecution to depend on a confession of the crime from the criminal to prosecute him/her, then 99.9 percent of all crimes will go without a prosecution. No. Intent is there before the crime, not after.He stayed right up and explained himself very well. So what happened to "ignorance of the law is no excuse"? That has nothing to do with 'intent'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boon Mee Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Check my shocked face! COMEY HAS LONG HISTORY OF CASES ENDING FAVORABLE TO CLINTONS"In 2004, Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, apparently limited the scope of the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger, which left out former Clinton administration officials who may have coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of classified records from the National Archives. The documents were relevant to accusations that the Clinton administration was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11 terrorist attack." .http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/comey-has-long-history-of-clinton-related-cases/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bark Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 The stanch of a cover up stinks to high havens, if we to judge what happened to General David Petraeus who got prosecuted, find and dumped for much less of what Clinton is allegedly to have done, double stander you say? you bet ya...... Clearly you have no idea of what Petraeus did, which involved INTENT. Petraeus, stupidly in retrospect, admitted that what he did was wrong. Thus, intent. If you are going to require every criminal prosecution to depend on a confession of the crime from the criminal to prosecute him/her, then 99.9 percent of all crimes will go without a prosecution. The General, had to plead guilty to avoid being court marshaled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimay1 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Reasons to believe there are double standards. NEW YORK – FBI Director James Comey has a long history of involvement in Department of Justice actions that arguably ended up favorable to the Clintons. http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/comey-has-long-history-of-clinton-related-cases/#! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbill Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 FBI Director Comey: If FBI Employees Did What Hillary Did They Would Be Fired, Clearance Revoked Can't take Crooked Hillary's clearence away - she's too big to fail! The US Department of State is now investigating State Department employees involved in this e-mail scandal . AP newswire stated yesterday that some may be dismissed or loose their security clearance. Looks like the minions will be the one’s taking the heat. Reminds me of Thailand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsetBkk Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 FBI Director James Comey vigorously defended the government's decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton Definitely a Mandy Rice-Davies moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilostmypassword Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 ^^ Yup, more votes for the Donald generated every day Crooked Hillary is out there... And I'm sure this time you're going to provide proof of that. Which would be a first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawker9000 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Oh sure. So if I'm a low level State Dept drone, hire someone to set up a server in my basement, then have them hack the secure enclave over at State so my own secure traffic is redirected to the unsecure server in my basement, why the FBI will be just fine with that... Riiiiiiight... And I had naively hoped Comey might actually have a spine... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 So what happened to "ignorance of the law is no excuse"? That has nothing to do with 'intent'. Correct, your intentions are immaterial when law has been broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linzz Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 From now on every government employee can refuse to use any secure government email server and they cannot be prosecuted because it is not a crime So much for the security of the USA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) So what happened to "ignorance of the law is no excuse"? That has nothing to do with 'intent'. Correct, your intentions are immaterial when law has been broken. Since no law can proven to have been broken, see FBI and AG statements, she must go free then. Edited July 8, 2016 by stevenl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Correct, your intentions are immaterial when law has been broken. Since no law can proven to have been broken, see FBI and AG statements, she must go free then. So the next person who wishes to sell state secrets has merely to set up his own server and invite his conspirators to hack it. No laws broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attrayant Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 So the next person who wishes to sell state secrets has merely to set up his own server and invite his conspirators to hack it. No laws broken. You've just expressed intent to sell state secrets. I'm pretty sure there's a law against that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thai3 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Not over yet then, the woman is clearly lying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggt Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Yeah, the Cookie Monster, Santa Claus, and Peter Rabbit are all real... The FBI director was given his part to play in this dark comedy drama...most of us...and especially H. Clinton...knew what the outcome would be when the investigation began... The US is becoming more like a vassal state...Lords who lord over you and do not follow the rules...and vassals who are punished by the same laws the Lords ignore... Sad day for all people...especially America's law abiding citizens... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 While I think Teflon Hillary lucked out on this, everyone who has ever handled classified information knows the rules and regulations. I do think the FBI did the best it could and just felt they could go not further and get the information they need to go for prosecution. The FBI should not have made a recommendation but should have just referred it to the Justice Department for a decision. While the end result would have been the same at least it would not have tarnished the FBI. I suggest anyone wanting to to read about just how slimy the Clintons are, to read "Clinton Cash." While many have claimed it to be a trash book by the right if only 10% is true both Clintons should be in jail. It was interesting in that Comey did not want to comment on Chaffetz question about whether there was any on going investigation of the Clinton Foundation. As someone said, she may not have lied to the FBI but she lied to the American people. The left has gotten to the point of having such little in the way of moral character that they didn't bat an eye to the fact that Hillary lied just as they did not when Bill lied about Monica. It's really kind of pathetic when you will support a candidate that flat out lied about what she did and had her lawyers destroy so much potential evidence. It was almost pathetic listening to the Democrats at the Congressional Hearing. They sounded like the most dumbass politicians one could elect. Most of them could not make a coherent statement and had to almost read everything. They were mental midgets even in attempting to defend the FBI and Hillary. Personally I'm think the hearings were helpful in understanding even more about what the FBI found and the reasoning behind things. The Democrats are all to quick in wanting this behind Hillary. One can only hope Donald will ask how Hillary can be President when she isn't worthy of a security clearance according to the FBI director. There is enough material there for many political spots on TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hulu Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 The Elite has his one rules.It was clear nothing will happens to Hillary.What a joke this whole thing is. Millions of Taxpayer money spend for nothing .rigged System ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzz Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 The Elite has his one rules.It was clear nothing will happens to Hillary.What a joke this whole thing is. Millions of Taxpayer money spend for nothing .rigged System ?[/quoteThe FBI director is no dummy and may have tried a little harder if that numbskull Trump wasn't their nominee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 So the next person who wishes to sell state secrets has merely to set up his own server and invite his conspirators to hack it. No laws broken. You've just expressed intent to sell state secrets. I'm pretty sure there's a law against that. Yep. For $50 I'll sell you every state secret I possess. Cheap at half that price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDGRUEN Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 A reason not to vote for her perhaps,not a reason to charge her with criminal intent. The laws Clinton violated do not require intent ... ask the sailor convicted of such crimes despite no intent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaBlue05 Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 (edited) While I think Teflon Hillary lucked out on this, everyone who has ever handled classified information knows the rules and regulations. I do think the FBI did the best it could and just felt they could go not further and get the information they need to go for prosecution. The FBI should not have made a recommendation but should have just referred it to the Justice Department for a decision. While the end result would have been the same at least it would not have tarnished the FBI. I suggest anyone wanting to to read about just how slimy the Clintons are, to read "Clinton Cash." While many have claimed it to be a trash book by the right if only 10% is true both Clintons should be in jail. It was interesting in that Comey did not want to comment on Chaffetz question about whether there was any on going investigation of the Clinton Foundation. As someone said, she may not have lied to the FBI but she lied to the American people. The left has gotten to the point of having such little in the way of moral character that they didn't bat an eye to the fact that Hillary lied just as they did not when Bill lied about Monica. It's really kind of pathetic when you will support a candidate that flat out lied about what she did and had her lawyers destroy so much potential evidence. It was almost pathetic listening to the Democrats at the Congressional Hearing. They sounded like the most dumbass politicians one could elect. Most of them could not make a coherent statement and had to almost read everything. They were mental midgets even in attempting to defend the FBI and Hillary. Personally I'm think the hearings were helpful in understanding even more about what the FBI found and the reasoning behind things. The Democrats are all to quick in wanting this behind Hillary. One can only hope Donald will ask how Hillary can be President when she isn't worthy of a security clearance according to the FBI director. There is enough material there for many political spots on TV. You are correct. It wasn't the FBI's position to decide on the future of the case and whether it should be prosecuted. Comey should have stayed away from the podium but Lynch used him to be the face of this scam so he was a good soldier and did as instructed. What better than to have a registered Republican be the messenger. The media will never have enough journalistic curiosity to peel back the layers on this so it's done. Edited July 9, 2016 by NovaBlue05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now