Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

France should have closed all mosques during its 3 days of mourning and made them pray outside.

No.

France does not intend giving credit to archaic societies by behaving like them.

Recall that in this country there are 7 million Muslims of which only a few dozen fanatics morons. And it's not too angelic to think that with time they will adopt our principles. Incidentally, this is already the case for almost all girls from this community.

I respond to the content, not the poster--

This the most moronic thing I have read lately. Yes, its too angelic to think in time... Not you. Your optimism is laudable, but its hour has passed.

There is not one single example in history you can point to to demonstrate why this optimism rests on facts; whereas I can point to every single example of hijra migration jihad turning out poorly for the host country.

I do not have the answer, but angelic wishful thinking is a choice, a choice for capitulation and surrender.

Yes, I think it is pointless to try to explain the impasse where leads your primary reasoning.

But for others, my point is that the childish solutions of sentencing an entire population pretext of some morons is not acceptable.

Furthermore we still have perspective on the harm of Islamic attacks. Traffic, suicide, alcoholism, addictions or even the flu are far more casualties.

In consequence all radical recommendation to disciminer people according to their faith or culture would be infinitely more harmful than terrorism itself.

Ah, I see more clearly. Not moronic (bad choice of words, sorry). I do not share this perspective but I see your point. Thku.
  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Of course France can't prevent another attack.

It's a silly question.

And still, even if all these measures and more are religiously adopted, no one can guarantee that terrorism on French soil and against French targets – and for the matter Europe – will be eradicated. Israel with its huge experience and innovative counter terrorism measures which are adopted worldwide can’t promise its citizens 100 percent success. Al-Qaida started its operations in 1998, and it took 10 years to almost completely destroy it first Afghanistan and then elsewhere. ISIS was created in 2012-13 so it will take a few more years but eventually its fate will be similar to al-Qaida.

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Analysis-How-to-stop-a-lone-wolf-460687

Posted

Of course France can't prevent another attack.

It's a silly question.

And still, even if all these measures and more are religiously adopted, no one can guarantee that terrorism on French soil and against French targets – and for the matter Europe – will be eradicated. Israel with its huge experience and innovative counter terrorism measures which are adopted worldwide can’t promise its citizens 100 percent success. Al-Qaida started its operations in 1998, and it took 10 years to almost completely destroy it first Afghanistan and then elsewhere. ISIS was created in 2012-13 so it will take a few more years but eventually its fate will be similar to al-Qaida.

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Analysis-How-to-stop-a-lone-wolf-460687

the guy is not alone, he received 100,000 euros before the attack, he s bisexual and alcoholics, definitely not a radical Muslim, all terrorist organizations are backed by states, the method has not changed since Carlos the Jackal, back in the 70s he was receiving funds from governments and he was recruiting left wing militants, today the Muslims are the best choice of recruiters, the CIA used terrorists to kill civilians on 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing in Italy.

Posted

Can they prevent another attack during the course of the next 1 million years?

Or do you mean in the next 11 seconds? How about next 344 years? 8,456 months?

I am 99.99999999999999999% sure the answer is NO, there will be another attack on France in the course of lifetime of the known Universe!!!!
Posted

the guy is not alone, he received 100,000 euros before the attack, he s bisexual and alcoholics, definitely not a radical Muslim, all terrorist organizations are backed by states, the method has not changed since Carlos the Jackal, back in the 70s he was receiving funds from governments and he was recruiting left wing militants, today the Muslims are the best choice of recruiters, the CIA used terrorists to kill civilians on 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing in Italy.

Piazza Fontana, Italia, 1969.

So very on topic ... rolleyes.gif

Dude, in future, if you are going to reply to my posts (don't feel that you need to) please actually post something that vaguely has something to do with what I posted.

Posted

the guy is not alone, he received 100,000 euros before the attack, he s bisexual and alcoholics, definitely not a radical Muslim, all terrorist organizations are backed by states, the method has not changed since Carlos the Jackal, back in the 70s he was receiving funds from governments and he was recruiting left wing militants, today the Muslims are the best choice of recruiters, the CIA used terrorists to kill civilians on 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing in Italy.

Piazza Fontana, Italia, 1969.

So very on topic ... rolleyes.gif

Dude, in future, if you are going to reply to my posts (don't feel that you need to) please actually post something that vaguely has something to do with what I posted.

I seriously don't believe these terrorists are acting alone on religious background, the guy was not even religious, they are big fishes out-there manipulating them, otherwise we 've seen how the US responded immediately to Libya on 1986 after the bombing of La belle nightclub, the elites / secret services are recruiting terrorists to bomb civilians that 's is it, period, otherwise why the US eliminated ben laden without giving us the chance to hear his story.

How do members of the massive ISIS organization communicate among themselves when the NSA can easily track phone calls, websites and E-mails ?

post-75536-0-45842000-1468869447_thumb.j

Posted

I have been living in Manila for the past couple of years and have grown used to the omnipresent security guards at all mall entrances, street corners etc.

I am actually in France at the moment - the last few days in Paris and now winding down through the Loire Valley by train and bus. What has struck me is how lax security is even now, literally days after the Nice attack. I left my hotel this morning with 2 large suitcases, took 2 metro trains to Gare Austerlitz, boarded a train to Orleans then another to Amboise, but never encountered any official, either from the train companies or the state. I simply don't see the response on the streets.

Posted

Drinking alcohol is forbidden in islam, but not driving a truck through a national celebration killing 84 and injuring hundreds.

It is a <deleted> 'religion' as are its followers.

Not for this Muslim...

Not according to his neighbour, always drunk, divorcee messing around with woman.

Has a criminal record as long as your arm...

Suppose he rather be a martyr than stoned (the Muslim way).

Or rather be 'stoned' than stoned with rocks??

Posted

The only hope of France is Marine le Pen, if she does not get elected ASAP you can simply say goodbye to France, good governance is better then good democracy, time for the french public to wake up otherwise more bombings are on the way, more governance of these corrupted elites and expect France to become another Afghanistan.

I m glade the Brits saved themselves from the utter destruction plan set by the corrupted elites by voting out of the EU, time for the french public to wake up and get the facts rights.


Posted

A very clever man (the French ex President) said not long ago that French people must marry interracially. If race mixing does not occur voluntarily the state will move to use force to make it happen. There is no choice in this matter, it must happen therefore it will happen. We will change all at the same time. To fail to racially interbreed will mean the end to France.

I believe the thrust of this would be that France can prevent another attack, but only when there are no white people left. Well, it is possible?

Posted

A very clever man (the French ex President) said not long ago that French people must marry interracially. If race mixing does not occur voluntarily the state will move to use force to make it happen. There is no choice in this matter, it must happen therefore it will happen. We will change all at the same time. To fail to racially interbreed will mean the end to France.

I believe the thrust of this would be that France can prevent another attack, but only when there are no white people left. Well, it is possible?

The middle east proves this idea wrong, it's killing for ideology not race.

Posted

The middle east proves this idea wrong, it's killing for ideology not race.

“We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran” –

General Wesley Clark in 2007

Posted

The middle east proves this idea wrong, it's killing for ideology not race.

“We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran” –

General Wesley Clark in 2007

That would raise the question "why?"

To secure the oil supply, Saudi Arabia supplies most we don't need to secure our oil supply

To promote our way of life as better, we could mind our own business

To prevent future war on home soil, the arab states were not a threat

Posted

I have been living in Manila for the past couple of years and have grown used to the omnipresent security guards at all mall entrances, street corners etc.

I am actually in France at the moment - the last few days in Paris and now winding down through the Loire Valley by train and bus. What has struck me is how lax security is even now, literally days after the Nice attack. I left my hotel this morning with 2 large suitcases, took 2 metro trains to Gare Austerlitz, boarded a train to Orleans then another to Amboise, but never encountered any official, either from the train companies or the state. I simply don't see the response on the streets.

The British way of countering terrorism in London when i lived there was to wait till an incident took place, then shut everything causing as much inconvenience to as many people as possible. After that, they posted lots of bored policemen in tube stations who did nothing for a week, then removed ALL the police and return to the status quo of never seeing a policeman patrolling.

War criminal Blair thought it was a good idea to put a tank in front of Heathrow terminal in case Al Qaeda launched an attack in force.

With leaders like that we are already defeated.

Posted

That would raise the question "why?"

To secure the oil supply, Saudi Arabia supplies most we don't need to secure our oil supply

To promote our way of life as better, we could mind our own business

To prevent future war on home soil, the arab states were not a threat

no the answer is here

"We Don’t Want ISIS Defeated in Syria" - IDF Major General Halevy

Israeli officials have regularly expressed comfort with the idea of ISIS conquering the whole of Syria, saying they find it preferable to the Iran-allied government surviving the war.

http://arretsurinfo.ch/israeli-intel-chief-we-dont-want-isis-defeated-in-syria/

I'm not sold on the idea

So the thought is the west destabalised the middle east to stop Iran/syria wiping out Israel ? so why Somalia/Libya, hard line Islamic states like Saudi Arabi makes more sense.

(have to go to work now)

Posted

I'm not sold on the idea

So the thought is the west destabalised the middle east to stop Iran/syria wiping out Israel ? so why Somalia/Libya, hard line Islamic states like Saudi Arabi makes more sense.

(have to go to work now)

Libya's Qaddafi was an enemy of Saudi Arabia, Qaddafi insulted the king publicly, watch it here on you-tube, he accused him of being a puppet to the west, he even sponsored an assassination attempt on him, on libyan TV the gulf monarchs were called the donkeys of the west.

Saudi Arabia and Qatar are a long term secret Ally of Israel since the 70s and of course the US and NATO, plus the CIA tried to assassinate Qaddafi since the 1970s, SA and Qatar are simply a front-end for the more powerful masters.

Posted

That would raise the question "why?"

To secure the oil supply, Saudi Arabia supplies most we don't need to secure our oil supply

To promote our way of life as better, we could mind our own business

To prevent future war on home soil, the arab states were not a threat

no the answer is here

"We Don’t Want ISIS Defeated in Syria" - IDF Major General Halevy

Israeli officials have regularly expressed comfort with the idea of ISIS conquering the whole of Syria, saying they find it preferable to the Iran-allied government surviving the war.

http://arretsurinfo.ch/israeli-intel-chief-we-dont-want-isis-defeated-in-syria/

According to 2012 leaked document obtained by Judicial Watch“there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime …

There is controversy about what you are posting about the Israeli General. I've noticed a pattern in your posts ... posting a massive amount of anti-Israel, anti-USA CONSPIRACY THEORY propaganda. Extremist, inflammatory stuff. You are free of course to broadcast your Israel demonization conspiracy theory agenda, but you are trusting a translation of Hebrew that may indeed be very distorted.

Are there any fluent Hebrew speakers to clarify? I wouldn't trust google translate either:

http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/788/120.html

Israeli Guy from Tel Aviv
icon-link.gif
28 days 10 hours ago

Misleading liers. This is the NRG article:http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/788/120.html

He said: “Israel doesn’t want the situation in Syria over with ISIS defeated, the superpowers leaving and we are left against Hezbollah and Iran with larger millitary capabilities”

This is very different than implying that Israeli is supporting Daesh. I have read that a lot of the Arab/Muslim/Israel demonization world actually believes terror attacks as in Nice are done by Israel. That is garbage. You've skirted those kind of implications ... and such garbage needs to be refuted.

Posted

No country can stop any attacks whilst it's full of Muslim jihadist's and Muslim jihadist sympathizers or Muslim jihadist sympathizers, who pretend not to be sympathizers, but who really are in their hearts and as long as the PC brigade keep protecting all and sundrie.

Posted

It's a numbers game France is sunk due to Muslim immigration. Merkel is doing her level best to make the rest of Europe suffer the same fate.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263534/lone-wolf-terrorism-caused-muslim-immigration-daniel-greenfield

Lone wolf terrorism operates entirely off the existing Muslim population in a particular country. The bigger the Muslim population, the bigger the risk. Any Muslim or Muslims who have settled in a particular non-Muslim country can answer the call of Jihad at any given time without warning.

Posted

Populations need to give up more privacy to prevent more attacks. That's a political decision. The more attacks, the more privacy they'll be willing to give up.

Posted

the only person who can saves France right now is Marine le pen and she s 100% compatible with my views, watch out how the MSM will start a crusade war against her and her Party, keep voting for Clinton or Sakozy and watch out the whole world turning into chaos.

Posted

France should have closed all mosques during its 3 days of mourning and made them pray outside.

No.

France does not intend giving credit to archaic societies by behaving like them.

Recall that in this country there are 7 million Muslims of which only a few dozen fanatics morons. And it's not too angelic to think that with time they will adopt our principles. Incidentally, this is already the case for almost all girls from this community.

If the punishments were harsher, the Muslims community would police themselves...

If Germany deported 100 Syrians for every one who did a crime,the peaceful ones who want to live there would take action against their own violent teenagers

The west is too soft and they're going to get raped because of it....

France too, they've allowed them in and now good luck getting them out...

Posted

Populations need to give up more privacy to prevent more attacks. That's a political decision. The more attacks, the more privacy they'll be willing to give up.

I agree. A certain contributer on Fox years ago fortold all of this, but he was ridiculed for being a loon and his contract wasn't renewed. I guess he's the one laughing now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...