webfact Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 BURNING ISSUE Military, govt must stop branding critics ‘political enemies’ Pratch Rujivanarom Narissarawan BANGKOK: -- Hit by multiple controversies, the military is placing itself beyond the reach of public inspection by branding anyone who dares challenge its practices, a public enemy or slapping them with a lawsuit. One notable example is the case of Narissarawan Kaewnopparat, who is seeking justice for her uncle, who was beaten death while serving as an Army conscript in 2011. Narissarawan is being sued for defamation over the accusation that an Army Captain, who is reportedly the son of a general, ordered the fatal beating. Full story: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Military-govt-must-stop-branding-critics-political-30296793.html -- © Copyright The Nation 2016-10-04 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukrules Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 They really should because their political enemies will only use proxies to attack their opponents, surely they're not that stupid are they ? Sounds like they're going after the low hanging fruit yet again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoboKay Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 Quote The country has reached a very dangerous situation, since Thai history has taught us that uncontrolled and unchecked use of power results in devastating tyranny. Doesn't seems like anything was taught, this situation is almost cyclical and doomed to repeat itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alive Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 I think the Army sees the masses as their enemies and sheep to be used and a small group as their supporters. They certainly don't care about the people having voices or prosecuting those in their membership who the people call out for corruption or abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NongKhaiKid Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 There's quite a few things they Must Stop or at least would be well advised to BUT that's End of Story ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldroj Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 What do you expect from soldiers with little or no experience of external conflict? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukrules Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 1 minute ago, waldroj said: What do you expect from soldiers with little or no experience of external conflict? There is always 'an enemy within'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smedly Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 The article makes a very good point, although there are very divisive elements here that will use others to cause trouble I think it is time they started to relax the heavy handed no tolerance approach and begin to relax things a little - if going forward they need to tighten the grip a little if certain elements start causing trouble then there is nothing stopping them from doing so. The majority of People are getting used to the no conflict environment but there are a tiny minority who are seeing their massive corruption fueled incomes come to an abrupt end - a hard pill to swallow for some who have been at it for years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcpo Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 There is no organization more corrupt and self-interested than the Thai military. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 "We can only hope it [military government] does the right thing, and avoids repeating the mistakes of past authoritarian regimes whose violence against their opponents has left such deep scars in Thai history." Based on Thailand's histry of military coups, it is a forlorn and delusional hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baboon Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 2 hours ago, smedly said: The article makes a very good point, although there are very divisive elements here that will use others to cause trouble I think it is time they started to relax the heavy handed no tolerance approach and begin to relax things a little - if going forward they need to tighten the grip a little if certain elements start causing trouble then there is nothing stopping them from doing so. The majority of People are getting used to the no conflict environment but there are a tiny minority who are seeing their massive corruption fueled incomes come to an abrupt end - a hard pill to swallow for some who have been at it for years Authoritarian military governments don't do 'relaxing'. Anyone not with them is against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loh Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 3 hours ago, smedly said: The article makes a very good point, although there are very divisive elements here that will use others to cause trouble I think it is time they started to relax the heavy handed no tolerance approach and begin to relax things a little - if going forward they need to tighten the grip a little if certain elements start causing trouble then there is nothing stopping them from doing so. The majority of People are getting used to the no conflict environment but there are a tiny minority who are seeing their massive corruption fueled incomes come to an abrupt end - a hard pill to swallow for some who have been at it for years Your figment of imagination is eluding you to some sense of reality. The series of bombs and the escalating violence in the south must have been just your illusion. The heavy handed suppression and unfair targeting of enemies are just temporary relief of open conflict. Everything has a threshold and that limit is fast arriving. Massive corruption has not come to an end. It just went to another group of snouts. Blatant corruptions, cronyism, nepotism and still have the gall to deny and the power to squash any investigation. This facts are hard pill for you to swallow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbrenn Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 A bunch of incompetent old soldiers will never accept criticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 7 hours ago, Father Fintan Stack said: Except in the South where violence is at the highest levels since it began again in earnest in 2004. Only the ones the junta has singled out. Corruption as a whole under this regime has worsened, as there is now no need for transparency. Could you supply factual evidence of your last sentence please? Or is this another of your unsubstantiated non factual opinions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Just now, Father Fintan Stack said: Preecha's son, Hawaii trips, Rajabhakti Park, Conference room equipment, etc. You do read the news yes? That there's no need for transparency is self-explanatory. http://thediplomat.com/2014/10/thai-junta-beset-by-corruption-scandals/ So where's your comparison that shows this is worse than the various scams under the previous regime? Rice scheme, water management ................. etc etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chainarong Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 The only enemy the Thai Junta has is itself , they will find that out when the population gets sick n tired of their waste and restrictive practices, and invasion of privacy , for they are yet to come , Junta's are as predictable as tomorrow............................................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbrenn Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, Baerboxer said: So where's your comparison that shows this is worse than the various scams under the previous regime? Rice scheme, water management ................. etc etc etc So now we are talking only about perceived degrees of badness. They are all bad, so what gives the Army the right to kick out an elected government on an anti-corruption lie, when the Army is itself corrupt? Please explain how you differentiate between your perceived degrees of badness. .... What gives one bad group the right to moralise about another bad group, shutting down all opposition and appearing more and more tyrannical in doing so. ... using military force to intimidate and kill unarmed civilians when the remit of the. Army is to repel foreign invaders .... and so on. Edited October 4, 2016 by dbrenn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanuman2543 Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 1 hour ago, Baerboxer said: Could you supply factual evidence of your last sentence please? Or is this another of your unsubstantiated non factual opinions? Are you for real? Do you want to be taken serious? I want some of what you are smoking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoboKay Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Is there ever one regime that's better than its predecessor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlindMagician Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 On 10/4/2016 at 5:45 AM, waldroj said: What do you expect from soldiers with little or no experience of external conflict? Winston V Kim. Lion V school yard bully. Now that's an interesting meeting I would like to witness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now