Jump to content

AP-GfK poll: Most Trump supporters doubt election legitimacy


webfact

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

56 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

If Jeb Bush, Kasich, Rubio, or Cruz could turn back the clock, knowing what they now know, How differently would they have campaigned?

 

 

Rubio tried that. He attacked Trump in the same manner in one of the debates. It did not work with voters.  Too bad because he would have been my first choice. Kasich was my second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ulysses G. said:

Rubio tried that. He attacked Trump in the same manner in one of the debates. It did not work with voters.  Too bad because he would have been my first choice. Kasich was my second.

 

I somewhat agree.  Yes, Rubio attacked Trump a bit, but Trump rolled over him like a steamroller, like he rolled over anyone else, including the debate moderators.  It was Trump's bellicose personality, rudeness, outlandish demeanor and his fame as a TV host that propelled him to the top.  His policy suggestions (all vague and grandstanding) were secondary.  It gives a picture of what it takes to become the most popular candidate for Republican voters.   They allowed Frankentrump to break out of the lab, now they've got to stay with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Rubio blew it when, at one of the debates, he repeated the same phrase, "Obama knows exactly what he's doing" - four times within 100 seconds, using the same tone of voice, like a robotron.  Christie called him on it.  So in that scenario, I think Christie came out on top - tho Kasich, in my view, was the only halfway decent candidate.   Jeb Bush was ok, but a whoos, like when he asked a meeting, "please clap" or when he trotted his mom out to campaign for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/28/2016 at 2:05 AM, dunroaming said:

When everything tells you that you are going to lose then there are two ways to respond.  First, you take it on the chin and then shake hands with the victor.  Second is to run around screaming that it is fixed!

 

You do realize you are describing Hillary since the FBI decided the email case is still active? 

Edited by Ulysses G.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Ulysses G. said:

You do realize you are describing Hillary since the FBI decided the email case is still active? 

the above is in response to dunroaming's; "When everything tells you that you are going to lose then there are two ways to respond.  First, you take it on the chin and then shake hands with the victor.  Second is to run around screaming that it is fixed!"

 

No Ulysses, dunroaming is not describing HRC, he/she is describing Trump.  Only Trump is saying the election will be fixed if he doesn't win.  HRC isn't saying that.   HRC is a fair player who, like every other presidential contender in the past 240 years, has embraced the democratic principle of accepting whomever is elected by a majority of voters.

 

Trump is the only one in US history who is crying like a baby.   Anyone who wants to know what a thorough loser Trump is, should watch some of the brief "LOSER DONALD" segments put together by Cenk of 'The Young Turks'   Cenk hits the bullseye in every segment.  No one in the Trump campaign can lift a finger to dispute his observations, because they're all true.  Cenk started 100 days before November 8th, and has kept to his promise of publishing a new segment each day.   Trump has more shit in his stall than an elephant farm.   No one can say with a straight face that, if Trump were elected, the shitstorm would cease.  If anything, it will become much more of a shitstorm.  Right now, there are 13 women who have come forth with sexual assault accusations against him.   In six months it could be over 100, including some 13 yr olds (like the case which is going to court in December).  And being a sexual predator is only a tiny fraction of Trump's failings.   Anyhow, here's one of Cenk's programs. . . . . . .

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ulysses G. said:

Hillary is crying about Comey continuing the investigation and suggesting that it is fixed. She loved him when he refused to charge her. What a complete Hypocrite!

Well, it might not do her any good as there now seems to be some pretty serious stuff in those emails that will actually be the final nail in Crooked Hillery's coffin:

https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU7

Edited by Boon Mee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Well, it might not do her any good as there now seems to be some pretty serious stuff in those emails that will actually be the final nail in Crooked Hillery's coffin:

https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU7

 

2 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Several "final nails" actually:

 

Breaking: Hillary Got Politically Annihilated… WikiLeaks Just Released A List With ISIS Donors

http://endingthefed.com/breaking-hillary-got-politically-annihilated-wikileaks-just-released-a-list-with-isis-donors.html#.WBXsAxiu0M3.twitter

Twitter and Wikileaks, you really grasp at straws.  Regarding the twitter story; Californian is going overwhelmingly for Hillary, it would be idiotic to pay for additional votes.  Regarding Wikileaks, your link it to a conspiracy theory news site that opens the story with " Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton are the founders of ISIS."  From there it goes into conspiracy nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, heybruce said:

Twitter and Wikileaks, you really grasp at straws.  From there it goes into conspiracy nonsense.

 

Boon Mee's favorite territories...

:biggrin:

Edited by metisdead
Please do not modify someone else's post in your quoted reply, either with font or color changes or wording.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Several "final nails" actually:

 

Breaking: Hillary Got Politically Annihilated… WikiLeaks Just Released A List With ISIS Donors

http://endingthefed.com/breaking-hillary-got-politically-annihilated-wikileaks-just-released-a-list-with-isis-donors.html#.WBXsAxiu0M3.twitter

 

Does it include Putin?

 

WikiLeaks began as a disrupter force in the battle for government transparency. They heralded a movement that professed freedom of information and open access to the inner sanctum of officialdom. Unfortunately, they have now devolved into just another self-serving political propaganda outfit. Their motives are blatantly partisan and they are affiliated with shady foreign powers.

 

Putin had his own Pussy Riot...

 

 

 

http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=pussy-riot

Edited by Publicus
Add video.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A grammar police troll post has been removed.  Another post has been edited to remove font changes:

 

Forum Netiquette
 
2. Please do not modify someone else's post in your quoted reply, either with font or color changes or wording. Such posts will be deleted and the user warned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...