Like is there are builders and developers who would absolutely take advisor reduced regulation to discard costly safety and environmental measures to boost profits.
This would not be a response restricted to the housing markets, history is full of examples of profit before safety/environment.
Regulations have to a very large extent been put in place to address past abuses.
There are however other reasons why housing is expensive, top of the list is the use of housing/land as an investment vehicle. Addressing this would not put safety or the environment at risk.
Thank you for your response, which I do appreciate.
Recommended Posts