Jump to content

I T Manager


kurgen

should we hang him ?  

63 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

and to think that i was kicked off this web forum for bad behavior when that sex case was filthing up young boys

i say cut off his tackle then hang the tosser

Im with ya mate, you cant get angry and swear - you get suspended!

You are a convicted child molester and you get an admin job :D

I wish he came to my place of work! :o

Even worse, he also said that he is pretty sure that the gentleman is a switch-hitter. Something about why would a straight guy spend so much time on a Gay forum!

Jing, jing. :D

a switch hitter?? :D , I will let you explain Georgie!

I must admit, I do like the gay forums - it always smells nice and the people are so friendly :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the reg details for his website:

Organization:

A Page in Time

John DiPane

PO Box 5212

Plainfield, NJ 07061

US

Phone: 908 337 5216

Email: [email protected]

Registrar Name....: Register.com

Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com

Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

Domain Name: CHIANGMAIMALL.COM

Created on..............: Tue, Oct 12, 1999

Expires on..............: Tue, Oct 12, 2004

Record last updated on..: Thu, Nov 06, 2003

Administrative Contact:

A Page in Time

John DiPane

PO Box 5212

Plainfield, NJ 07061

US

Phone: 908 337 5216

Email: [email protected]

Technical Contact:

A Page in Time

John DiPane

PO Box 5212

Plainfield, NJ 07061

US

Phone: 908 337 5216

Email: [email protected]

Zone Contact:

A Page in Time

John DiPane

PO Box 5212

Plainfield, NJ 07061

US

Phone: 908 337 5216

Email: [email protected]

Domain servers in listed order:

NS1.APAGEINTIME.COM 140.186.45.140

NS2.APAGEINTIME.COM 140.186.45.141

Register your domain name at http://www.register.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

everybody is so quick to judge, but i cant help but think this has happened very soon after the deportation of that american invovled with the burmese hilltribes who IT admitted he knew very well.What saddens me is the anger showed so readily (rightly so if true) about ITs misdeamenors but where is the anger of the many human rights atrocities accuring everyday in Thailand , also involving children.Thats right its not our country blah blah blah,- but we dont mind living here and turning a blind eye to it.

Would not sell the spread on the life expectancy of the children who were once in ITs care/home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with ParryHarry on this one. If David is found guilty of any offence (whatever that may be), then he will be punished according to the laws of the relevant country.

But just listen to the lynch mob on this forum!! Why were you lot all screaming 'lynch him' when reports of drug-pushers and smugglers are mentioned on this website. If David has committed offences against one or a number of boys then that's certainly a terrible offence, particularly for the boys in question. But what about the hundreds, thousands of children, teenagers and adults who have suffered and died due to the actions of drug-pushers etc.

If you're gonna have a lynch mob then at least be consistent! Otherwise shut up and let the due course of law be followed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm not judging either way, and indeed if any crimes hve been commited they should be brought to bear.

BUT

alot of people have been saying that he has been convicted elswhere for child sex acts and pornoghaphy but as far as i see NO ONE has provided proof of this other than newspaper articles that might or might not in fact be true.

has any one got Proof of any previoes convictions........ if not shut up until he has been proven guilty of anything.......if you have proof, post it

as for the remark about the existing charge of harbouring an illegal, he did not hide the fact in any way that the boy (man) lived with him.

as i have said if it turns out that he is a 'nonce' then he will be prosecuted for sex offences against children(the question is where as according to the thai police it will not be in thailand)and i have not seen any evidence that the aussie police have anything either......

but if so and proved or if in fact he has previose convictions then he does deserve all they throw at him....

but untill then inoccent untill PROVEN......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quick to judge what? he's already been convicted before, once is enough, i certainly would'nt turn a blind eye on child molesters.

Please, Dave, give us the details on the judgment, how much time IT served in Australia and why, why, he was allowed to leave his country?

Australia wanted to get rid of him?

So why do they want him back?

As I said before, on what basis are you condemning him?

Please, give me FACTS and I will be the first one to condemn him.

But as much as I hate pedophiles, I sure hate witch hunters the same, if not more,...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quick to judge what? he's already been convicted before, once is enough, i certainly would'nt turn a blind eye on child molesters.

Please, Dave, give us the details on the judgment, how much time IT served in Australia and why, why, he was allowed to leave his country?

Australia wanted to get rid of him?

So why do they want him back?

As I said before, on what basis are you condemning him?

Please, give me FACTS and I will be the first one to condemn him.

But as much as I hate pedophiles, I sure hate witch hunters the same, if not more,...

point taken bc, i've been reading the same as everyone else including the links and comments from so called neighbours and people accusing him.

my main point was regarding turning a blind eye and human rights concerning child abuse. in my opinion there is'nt and should'nt be any.

About child abusers and the like my personal opinions are very strong, i did'nt know IT, and i've my own feelings on the subject and will not air my thoughts until all facts are made clear 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About child abusers and the like my personal opinions are very strong, i did'nt know IT, and i've my own feelings on the subject and will not air my thoughts until all facts are made clear 100%.

Most of us have very, very strong opinions on the question.

And this is how it should be.

But strong opinions are not always objective and can lead to abuse.

I hope in this particular case, people are doing the right thing.

But, unfortunately, I would like to be as convinced as quite a few people are but I'm not.

And it worries me.

Destroying life of people is not a joking matter and in this particular case, some people will die and as much as I like joking, it does not make me laugh,...

Sorry,...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what about the previous charges in oz?

can we beleieve the Aussie press ? If the Thais have evidence that he has been abusing kids and videos then how come they havent charged him ?

Its normal when a pedo is caught in LOS to charge them and put them away (or they buy their way out of jail ) ,something smells fishy about this case .

As fishy as the ChiangMai guesthouse murder , which was never solved ..

I have in mind poor old late departed Father Brennon of the pattaya orphanage , who was accused by the UK papers of running a sex tourists business with his kids.

Pages of total and utter false fabrications were written and published about the guy .

and may he rest in peace ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first pages started with a lot of friends defend him (whatever his name is) and

try to make him like a hero. Seems like they dont know anything about him.

I wonder what kind of friends. After read posts from members who really do know what kind of guy he is, well I am not judging, just think he is

[cut.. /Chanchao --I deleted the rest on the assumption that you don't know him or this case either. I do apologize for this, and note there was no bad language in your post, but I don't want some daytime TV talkshow lynch fest here at this point in time. --Chanchao]

Can't understand why Chanchao have to delete a sentence from my post when you

let everybody any else said what they want. There are more TV talkshow lynch fest

now when I posted. Everybody with a little common sence don't need to wait a court to lynch him. Everyone is innocence untill proven guilty? I doubt so, If you have support from powerfull people, you can get away with anything.

Just remember Simpson!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I doubt so, If you have support from powerfull people, you can get away with anything.

Just remember Simpson! "

and i've you have the anger on you from powerfull people, you can also get charged with anything, especially in LOS!

you righteous enough the be a judge royar ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary Glitter starts legal fight to stay in Cambodia

DISGRACED British glam rock star Gary Glitter has launched a legal fight to stay in Cambodia after being ordered out of the country due to his conviction for possessing child porn.

Glitter, whose real name is Paul Francis Gadd, spent four months in a British jail in 1999 after being found guilty of downloading child pornography from the internet.

He has since been hounded out of Cambodia twice by child rights activists and put on an entry blacklist, government officials said today.

He has, however, managed to return to the country which has a reputation as a haven for paedophiles and perverts.

Glitter has now filed a lawsuit against a Cambodian government deportation order, according to Women’s Affairs Minister Mu Sochua, who has fought to have him barred.

Local police said Glitter, who became a household name in Britain in the 1970s with his glam rock, had been living for nearly a year in Phnom Penh’s southern outskirts where he has bought a house.

"Sometime he comes out and goes jogging in the village. Sometimes he leaves for holidays but mostly he stays in Cambodia," local policeman Chan Savoeun said.

Neither Glitter nor his lawyers could be reached for comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...