Jump to content

The anti-Trump resistance takes shape: 'Government's supposed to fear us'

webfact

By webfact
in World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

craigt3365 Star Member

craigt3365

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, iReason said:

I wouldn't know.

Do you?

 

If so, please substantiate your sarcastic claim.

And support why you think "leftist" is a bad thing.

Nothing wrong with being left or right as long as you tell the truth.  So far, the Trump administration is falling short of this.

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Skywalker69 said:

Not all people have to open their mouths to be proven stupid.

 

(-Why  does he looks like an taliban?)

16939326_150738035442209_7716136577448146689_n.jpg

Do you think he knows that trump is planning to crack down on marijuana users? :stoner:

Morch Star Member

Morch

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, craigt3365 said:

And yet some say he was a terrible president.  I think an OK president with a terrible congress.  Love this comment from your link:

 

 

To be fair, Obama pulled this one off on friendly grounds, doubt public response would the same all over the country. Also, ignoring that Trump still gets a lot of support from "everyday Americans" is a choice. Underestimating this support, or dismissing all them people (such as those attending his post-elections campaign rallies, for example) is, IMO, a mistake.

rijb Gold Member

rijb

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Do you think he knows that trump is planning to crack down on marijuana users? :stoner:

Yeah, the Clinton approach of making fun of people really worked for her.  Duh!

rijb Gold Member

rijb

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, craigt3365 said:

Nothing wrong with being left or right as long as you tell the truth.  So far, the Trump administration is falling short of this.

You're right (no pun intended).  But, the left (and some of the OTT posters here) should focus their hate on Trump, instead of attacking his supporters.  That will only entrench each side further.  And everybody will lose.

 

You're one of the few that seems to understand that.

Skywalker69 Platinum Member

Skywalker69

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, rijb said:

You're right (no pun intended).  But, the left (and some of the OTT posters here) should focus their hate on Trump, instead of attacking his supporters.  That will only entrench each side further.  And everybody will lose.

 

You're one of the few that seems to understand that.

Phoenix-area teacher resigns after tweeting about killing immigrants

 

http://ktar.com/story/1468093/phoenix-area-teacher-resigns-allegedly-tweeting-killing-immigrants/

Skywalker69 Platinum Member

Skywalker69

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, rijb said:

I'll bet she was eager to sign up for Obamacare.  She was probably a big Obama supporter too.  

She voted for Trump. Period. The name Obamacare is a given name for the ACA given by the republicans. So she must have signed for the ACA as many republican supporters have done.

 

boomerangutang Platinum Member

boomerangutang

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, rijb said:

You're right (no pun intended).  But, the left (and some of the OTT posters here) should focus their hate on Trump, instead of attacking his supporters.  That will only entrench each side further.  And everybody will lose.

 

You're one of the few that seems to understand that.

 

8 minutes ago, Skywalker69 said:

THE GUY WHO CAUGHT BIN LADEN THINKS TRUMP IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN BIN LADEN
http://winningdemocrats.com/the-guy-who-caught-bin-laden-thinks-trump-is-more-dangerous-than-bin-laden/

        I agree:  Bin Laden was dangerous, but what did he tangibly do to the US?  He gave the green light to bombing the World Trade Center, The Pentagon, and other heinous crimes.  

In contrast, Trump is crapping on the 1st Amendment, is poised to set the US on a downhill economic slide, and compares the CIA with Nazis and calls US journalists; "The most dishonest people".  In relation to the Russian connection, Trump's only focus is; "who leaked"?   He has zero concern for breaking laws and conspiring with an adversary country against America's best interests.

 

         Regarding Trump and Bannon's fixation with leaks, several people who have worked at the WH for many years, were abruptly fired in the past few days.  Purported reason: couldn't pass security clearance requirements. 

Skywalker69 Platinum Member

Skywalker69

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

 

        I agree:  Bin Laden was dangerous, but what did he tangibly do to the US?  He gave the green light to bombing the World Trade Center, The Pentagon, and other heinous crimes.  

In contrast, Trump is crapping on the 1st Amendment, is poised to set the US on a downhill economic slide, and compares the CIA with Nazis and calls US journalists; "The most dishonest people".  In relation to the Russian connection, Trump's only focus is; "who leaked"?   He has zero concern for breaking laws and conspiring with an adversary country against America's best interests.

 

         Regarding Trump and Bannon's fixation with leaks, several people who have worked at the WH for many years, were abruptly fired in the past few days.  Purported reason: couldn't pass security clearance requirements. 

16864995_10210634242485441_8000706524171335643_n.jpg

Morch Star Member

Morch

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Skywalker69 said:

Has the support for Trump shrunken here on TVF? 

 

I doubt it. For one thing, this specific topic seems to be sorta off-limits for pro-Trump posts. Otherwise, I suggest that this is rather typical of winning sides: active during campaigns, perhaps a bit longer to rub it in. Then nothing much, because if things pan out to one's satisfaction, there's little motivation. Bliss ain't much of an incentive for creativeness.

boomerangutang Platinum Member

boomerangutang

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, rijb said:

What damages?  And to who?

        If you don't see the many damaging things Trump is doing, then you simply don't want to see.

It's like the crazed mom who, when confronted with her son being a felon, cries, "No. That's impossible.  He's my sweet little boy.  He could never do such things."     If you saw the TV-series Pablo Escobar (note; it's long, but very entertaining), there's a scene in the final episode where Pablo's mother is crying out to the reporters when news breaks that her son has been shot dead - saying what a good boy he is, and how he supported a local soccer team, and was always nice to everybody, ........

rijb Gold Member

rijb

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, boomerangutang said:

        If you don't see the many damaging things Trump is doing, then you simply don't want to see.

It's like the crazed mom who, when confronted with her son being a felon, cries, "No. That's impossible.  He's my sweet little boy.  He could never do such things."     If you saw the TV-series Pablo Escobar (note; it's long, but very entertaining), there's a scene in the final episode where Pablo's mother is crying out to the reporters when news breaks that her son has been shot dead - saying what a good boy he is, and how he supported a local soccer team, and was always nice to everybody, ........

Ok.  What damages?  And to who?

boomerangutang Platinum Member

boomerangutang

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Morch said:

I doubt it. For one thing, this specific topic seems to be sorta off-limits for pro-Trump posts. Otherwise, I suggest that this is rather typical of winning sides: active during campaigns, perhaps a bit longer to rub it in. Then nothing much, because if things pan out to one's satisfaction, there's little motivation. Bliss ain't much of an incentive for creativeness.

            Are you blissful when Trump attacks people (media, CIA, FBI) who are trying to uncover whether there were illegal (and possible treasonous) connections between Trump, his people, and Russian agents?  

 

         BTW, AG Sessions and FBI head Comey should both recuse themselves from any of t he Russian-connection investigations, as they're both probably complicit. Even a right-wing Republican senator on the 'Ways and Means' committee admitted that, reluctantly, when grilled in an interview yesterday, by Bill Maher.

 

           How blissful is it when you hear a little Iraqi girl can't come to the USA to get life-saving heart surgery - due to Trump and Bannon's illegal travel ban?

boomerangutang Platinum Member

boomerangutang

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, rijb said:

Ok.  What damages?  And to who?

You're pretending that you haven't been paying attention.  And you want me to make a list for you, so you can turn your nose up and say none of it matters?   Actually, there are three categories of damages when relating to Trump.  There are the hundreds of grievous damages (including, but not exclusive to the 3,000+ still-active lawsuits against him) before he was elected.   Then there are the damages he's done since the election.  Thirdly, there are the myriad serious damaging things which will ensue from his (and Bannon's) immensely flawed policies. 

 

Too many to list here.  Maybe I'll write them in a book, and you can pay $9.95 to read them.   

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



ASEANNOW

ASEANNOW (formerly Thai Visa) Thailand's oldest and most popular forum for expats and foreigners.

Sign up today and have your say

MORE INFO

POPULAR AREAS

CONTACT US

219/59 Asoke Towers, 15th Floor, Soi Sukhumvit 21, Watthana, Bangkok 10110
(+66) 99 196 1100
[email protected]

×
×
  • Create New...