.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
87
Clarence Thomas v District Judges
Bray - The best argument against statutory authority to grant national injunctions is that neither the APA nor the Judiciary Act of 1789 authorize them. Frost - In his concurrence in Trump v. Hawaii, Justice Thomas criticized nationwide injunctions and declared that “[i]f their popularity continues, this Court must address their legality.”................ a Seventh Circuit panel discussed the propriety of a nationwide injunction in detail. The Seventh Circuit then agreed to review the scope of the injunction en banc (though argument in that case was recently postponed). Going forward, it seems likely that courts will be more cautious in issuing these injunctions, which in turn may take away the incentive for Congress or the Supreme Court to address the issue. But of course, it is always difficult to predict what the future will hold. https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/one-for-all-are-nationwide-injunctions-legal/ -
63
Kalasin tax office today- result!
You can be asked to prove it. How convenient will that be at extension time, or at an airport? Do you need the grief? For that magic piece of paper that gives you the all clear for the next 12 months. Just the same as extension. One of the first on a simple Google search. https://resourcehub.bakermckenzie.com/en/resources/tax-dispute-resolution---criminal-proceedings/asia-pacific/thailand/topics/international-guide-on-criminalization-of-tax-offenses#:~:text=According to section 37 bis,to BHT 200%2C000%2C or both. "According to section 37 bis of the Revenue Code, any person intentionally fails to file tax return forms to evade tax shall be subject to an imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to BHT 200,000, or both." Now, do you see any part of the above that mentions, "only if we have to come to you?" They don't have to find you. You will go to the them at extension time or at a boarder. That's why this method of compliance and enforcement is perfect for them, but you call it scaremongering. It's laughable. -
63
Kalasin tax office today- result!
You can be asked to prove it. How convenient will that be at extension time, or at an airport? Do you need the grief? For that magic piece of paper that gives you the all clear for the next 12 months. Just the same as extension. One of the first on a simple Google search. https://resourcehub.bakermckenzie.com/en/resources/tax-dispute-resolution---criminal-proceedings/asia-pacific/thailand/topics/international-guide-on-criminalization-of-tax-offenses#:~:text=According to section 37 bis,to BHT 200%2C000%2C or both. "According to section 37 bis of the Revenue Code, any person intentionally fails to file tax return forms to evade tax shall be subject to an imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to BHT 200,000, or both." Now, do you see any part of the above that mentions, "only if we have to come to you?" They don't have to find you. You will go to the them at extension time or at a boarder. That's why this method of compliance and enforcement is perfect for them, but you call it scaremongering. It's laughable. -
2
queue for seniors at airports & 2.45 hours enough?
I fly from that airport to Fukuoka, Japan. The flight is around midnight if I remember correctly. It is recommended at least 3 hours before flight take off. Since you are flying out of DMK, what country are you flying to? -
1,590
5 year multiple entry DTV visa (Destination Thailand) from 2024-xx-xx
It appears that you are applying for a 'workcation' category DTV from the London Thai embassy. This is what I have. From memory, they are looking for either a "professional portfolio" or a "contract of employment clearly showing the opportunity to work remotely". I would suggest from the information that you have provided you are very much stretching the professional portfolio route. First of all, it is not professional. You are doing this in a personal capacity not a professional capacity. But you do not need to convince me. Having said that, I have always found the London Thai embassy will look at the big picture and has some latitude for their interpretation of the rules. So, give it a go. The worst case scenario is you lose the £300 application fee. To be honest, if you are 50 or over, the non-imm O will be a very straightforward application for you. This can then be extended in-country. This sounds far more suitable to your situation. -
63
Kalasin tax office today- result!
You can be asked to prove it. How convenient will that be at extension time, or at an airport? Do you need the grief? For that magic piece of paper that gives you the all clear for the next 12 months. Just the same as extension. One of the first on a simple Google search. https://resourcehub.bakermckenzie.com/en/resources/tax-dispute-resolution---criminal-proceedings/asia-pacific/thailand/topics/international-guide-on-criminalization-of-tax-offenses#:~:text=According to section 37 bis,to BHT 200%2C000%2C or both. "According to section 37 bis of the Revenue Code, any person intentionally fails to file tax return forms to evade tax shall be subject to an imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to BHT 200,000, or both." Now, do you see any part of the above that mentions, "only if we have to come to you?" They don't have to find you. You will go to the them at extension time or at a boarder. That's why this method of compliance and enforcement is perfect for them, but you call it scaremongering. It's laughable.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now