webfact Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 DSI decision due today on case involving Thaksin’s son By THE NATION Panthongtae Agency to assess if evidence is adequate to press charges in Krungthai bank money-laundering case BANGKOK: -- THE DEPARTMENT of Special Investigation (DSI) will make a decision today on whether to file charges against Panthongtae Shinawatra, the son of former premier Thaksin, and two others in a money-laundering case connected with malfeasance at the state-owned Krungthai Bank. The evidence was insufficient to take legal action against Panthongtae, Kanchana Honghern and Manop Tipwaree, especially after the Anti-Money Laundering Organisation (AMLO) failed to pursue charges, according to sources. The controversial case is connected to earlier malfeasance convictions of former senior executives at Krungthai Bank. In August 2015, the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Political Office Holders sentenced Suchai Chaovisit, former chairman of the bank, and former president Viroj Nualkhair to 18-year jail terms for approving Bt8-billion loans to subsidiaries of Krisada Mahanakorn Group in 2003 for refinancing and land acquisition. Full story: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30306373 -- © Copyright The Nation 2017-02-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 He could be defendant Number One, just like his daddy. The family will be so proud! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkidlad Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Time to get yourself in a big ostentatious temple surrounded by middle aged and elderly Thais. They don't arrest you then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhys Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 15 minutes ago, rkidlad said: Time to get yourself in a big ostentatious temple surrounded by middle aged and elderly Thais. They don't arrest you then. That is been out of the news... so was another deadline given... What do you expect from a cheater... the kind the bring in his cheat sheet to an exam... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinneil Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 DSI decision due today WOW. Easy to make decisions, but not easy catching crooks. His name alone is sufficient for him to be guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, colinneil said: DSI decision due today WOW. Easy to make decisions, but not easy catching crooks. His name alone is sufficient for him to be guilty. His name is reason for suspicion, coming from a family of criminals. The evidence that money deemed by the courts to have been stolen passed through his account/s should be sufficient to prove him guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Will be excused because of diminished responsibility, can't even cheat in exams without being caught. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAG Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 I wonder how the case against the PMs nephew is going... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 4 minutes ago, JAG said: I wonder how the case against the PMs nephew is going... Probably not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robblok Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 24 minutes ago, JAG said: I wonder how the case against the PMs nephew is going... If they took this long to charge him (given when this happened), then they certainly (if upholding the same time frame) can wait for a long time to decide on that case and not even be bias. That is the major problem here.. cases like this go so slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 1 hour ago, JAG said: I wonder how the case against the PMs nephew is going... "suspended along with other cases due to a legal technicality" NAAC Secretary-General Sansern Poljiak: " we have to slow down for only two months so we can fix internal regulations and make them comply with the bigger laws.” http://www.khaosodenglish.com/politics/2017/02/14/nacc-suspends-inquiry-prayuths-nephew/ There's no statute of limitations problems, so allegedly the slowdown is immaterial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 3 hours ago, JAG said: I wonder how the case against the PMs nephew is going... How strange, it was reported yesterday that case, along with all others, will be held up pending resolution of implementing new law technicalities. Did you forget? Seems that Shin fan amnesia is still affecting some posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USPatriot Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Ha nothing will happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAG Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 How strange, it was reported yesterday that case, along with all others, will be held up pending resolution of implementing new law technicalities. Did you forget? Seems that Shin fan amnesia is still affecting some posters.Irony - or at least an attempt BB. :-):-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike324 Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 strange part is that evidence was there and this case has dragged on for years until the last day.... Oak will walk free Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daftdada Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 The greater the fortune the greater the crime. Hang him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatawonderfulday Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 13 hours ago, halloween said: His name is reason for suspicion, coming from a family of criminals. The evidence that money deemed by the courts to have been stolen passed through his account/s should be sufficient to prove him guilty. Completely biased comment. It is a country of criminals, from the bottom to the top, not just one family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now