LA not sure it will play Trump card in Games bid

[rooster59]

LA not sure it will play Trump card in Games bid

By Rory Carroll

 

President Donald Trump returns from a weekend at his New Jersey golf estate home via Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, May 7, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

 

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Whether U.S. President Donald Trump will travel to Peru in September to promote Los Angeles' 2024 Olympics bid is an open question but many believe the controversial leader would do more harm than good as the city vies with Paris for the Games.

 

Trump's executive order to temporarily ban travel from six Muslim-majority countries, which is currently being reviewed in the courts, could prove problematic with the diverse membership of the International Olympic Committee when they vote later this year.

 

Los Angeles' fiercely liberal Mayor Eric Garcetti said the Trump White House had been supportive of the bid and despite their many differences, it was one area where they agreed.

 

"The president is willing to play whatever role that we ask and that is needed," Garcetti told reporters on Friday when asked whether Trump would travel to Peru to make a final push.

 

"This is something that has transcended politics."

 

Garcetti said Trump voiced his support for the bid during a phone call in December. At the time, Trump said he would travel to Lima if needed or host IOC President Thomas Bach at the White House.

 

The thorny issue of Trump's impact is even more pronounced since the IOC delegation reviewing the bids is expected to be greeted by France's President-elect Emmanuel Macron when they tour Paris next week.

 

In the election held earlier this month, Macron defeated nationalist Marine Le Pen, whose anti-immigration policies are seen as more in line with Trump's world view.

 

When Garcetti was asked by a reporter from Africa how Trump's restrictive stance on visas would impact athletes and journalists travelling from the continent, he said he had assurances from the administration and Congress that there would be no issues.

 

"We had the deputy secretary of Homeland Security here. She was asked a question along those lines and said, 'We can guarantee you that everybody will be able to come in,'" Garcetti said.

 

"I really felt that was the turning of a different page. I think the IOC was very happy to hear that," he said.

 

People close to the Los Angeles bid said a potential visit to Lima was not simply a question of Trump's politics, but also the security apparatus that accompanies a travelling U.S. president.

 

When former President Barack Obama travelled to Copenhagen in October 2009 to speak in favour of Chicago's bid for the 2016 Games, IOC members were miffed by the high level of security they had to pass to attend the meeting, which included bomb-sniffing dogs, Olympic sources told Reuters this week.

 

During his presidential campaign, Trump last year criticised Obama for the trip and for failing to deliver the Games.

 

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-05-13

[Yann55]

3 hours ago, rooster59 said:

"This is something that has transcended politics."

 

BS

 

The Olympic Games have NEVER transcended politics. It's wishful thinking at best, blatant hypocrisy at worst.

 

Even in ancient Greece, politics were never absent from the Games, and ever since Pierre de Coubertin re-instated the tradition in 1894, politics have inevitably and repeatedly invited themselves in this supposedly a-political event.

 

To think that sports in general and the Games in particular can be 'above politics' is a totally absurd notion anyway. Sports have an important place in the social sphere, and that makes them highly political. It's not a problem per se. Denying it is a problem. It's almost as absurd as pretending that the school system, or the Army, or show business, are 'above politics'.

[anotheruser]

Let Paris have the games. They can bankrupt themselves building useless sporting facilities.

[thaibeachlovers]

21 hours ago, Yann55 said:

 

BS

 

The Olympic Games have NEVER transcended politics. It's wishful thinking at best, blatant hypocrisy at worst.

 

Even in ancient Greece, politics were never absent from the Games, and ever since Pierre de Coubertin re-instated the tradition in 1894, politics have inevitably and repeatedly invited themselves in this supposedly a-political event.

 

To think that sports in general and the Games in particular can be 'above politics' is a totally absurd notion anyway. Sports have an important place in the social sphere, and that makes them highly political. It's not a problem per se. Denying it is a problem. It's almost as absurd as pretending that the school system, or the Army, or show business, are 'above politics'.

True. Palestinian/ Israeli crisis, black power protests, US boycott of Russian games etc etc.

[thaibeachlovers]

17 hours ago, anotheruser said:

Let Paris have the games. They can bankrupt themselves building useless sporting facilities.

Hopefully they won't build anything as grotesque as the horrid thing the Brits built for their games.