Jump to content

Govt spokesman dismisses removal of PM's consort’s image due to inappropriate costume


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, onthesoi said:

 

For someone who complains about not being able to bash Thailand and it's government you seem to a fairly good job several times per day on these forums.

The THai  government is not coterminous with Thailand. Bashing the first does not mean you are bashing the other. People who understand democracy understand this distinction. I'm an Australian citizen. I'm not fond of the government. I bash it quite often. But I like Australia very much, not least for the fact that I am allowed to bash the government.

Posted
21 hours ago, webfact said:

...her attire was appropriate...

 

I should think that during the current mouning period for King Rama 9, a black dress was indeed appropriate and most women and also men in this video frame from the same ceremony are dressed all in black.

 

597f7ad6a81ee_mourningblack.gif.d3494e7a8c69c3bf32d6537506d5864b.gif

Posted
21 hours ago, webfact said:

He said Mrs. Naraphorn was wearing a black Thai traditional costume, which was in accordance with the announcement of the Prime Minister’s Office and the consorts of other cabinet members were also dressed properly.

 

The Thai word for wife may have been translated as consort because in the same context the plural form is also used, with reference to the persons accompanying other cabinet members. As not not all cabinet members may be male and married, neither wife nor spouse would have been applicable for all of them, and "persons accomanying other cabinet ministers" would have been rather long-winded. I wonder how that part was written in Thai media.

Posted
3 hours ago, onthesoi said:

 

For someone who complains about not being able to bash Thailand and it's government you seem to a fairly good job several times per day on these forums.

Capture.JPG.3ec5059aae8ff6e239013492ce00fc8f.JPG

Posted
16 hours ago, ratcatcher said:

I am surprised you could not read between the lines. I had replied to a post by p_brownstone which was a vague clarification of the word consort in regard to its use in a news report. I posted a definition which happened to mention Queen Victoria, but more to the point, the word "companion". Discussion of the monarchy is a cul-de-sac, which is best avoided. My simple point was that the word (in English of course), will appear more frequently in future.

But neither the PM or the lady in question are royalty.

 

Too much importance being made of a poor choice of words when making a simple translation. The original Thai news releases appears to use the Thai words for 'wife' and 'his wife'.

 

The so-called Thai 'free press' are making much of bugger all. There's so much more pressing and important things they could bring up the current administration on but that would genuinely be too dangerous hard.

Posted
7 hours ago, Puccini said:

 

I should think that during the current mouning period for King Rama 9, a black dress was indeed appropriate and most women and also men in this video frame from the same ceremony are dressed all in black.

 

597f7ad6a81ee_mourningblack.gif.d3494e7a8c69c3bf32d6537506d5864b.gif

Maybe this was reason for the uproar.

Officials attending alms-giving ceremonies to mark HM King Maha Vajiralongkorn’s birthday this Friday are advised to wear cream-coloured attire with a black ribbon (Prayut)

Posted
4 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Maybe this was reason for the uproar.

Officials attending alms-giving ceremonies to mark HM King Maha Vajiralongkorn’s birthday this Friday are advised to wear cream-coloured attire with a black ribbon (Prayut)

That was LAST Friday.

 

Nothing to see here, move along now.

 

... unless you subscribe to the vague notion that those choosing to wear black were guilty of making some sort of silent protest or other such nonsense.

Posted
Just now, NanLaew said:

That was LAST Friday.

 

Nothing to see here, move along now.

 

... unless you subscribe to the vague notion that those choosing to wear black were guilty of making some sort of silent protest or other such nonsense.

Well encrypted.  

Posted

He further stated that information is often distorted nowadays, with the goal to undermine the credibility of the government, so it is the public's responsibility to carefully scrutinize the information they receive and avoid falling victim to a political scheme.

 

Does this sound suspiciously like the whole fake narrative nonsense coming out of the very white house? It seems those who do not like a critical view of themselves, always try to discredit the source of the news, rather than taking responsibility for their actions, and improving their performance. The Little man seems to hate criticism as much as the maniacal nitwit in the very white house. 

Posted
18 hours ago, tx22cb said:

The Prime Minister told everyone in Thailand to wear "auspicious-coloured" clothes on Friday for that Special day - but the PM's own wife (the Yellowest of yellows) apparently did not get the memo and wore black clothing.  

Patriotic citizens noticed this, and posted photos.  The Govt tried to ban the offensive photos, got lambasted by social media, and had to back down and claim that they weren't really serious about the attempt at censorship, "misunderstanding" and other usual excuses.

Nevertheless, it was an enormous faux pas, so I suspect the Wife will be in the dog house and keep a low profile for a while.

Maybe some don't like auspicious coloured clothes for reasons only known to them and prefer black for good reason. 

 

Posted

Looks like a lot of people didn't get that 'memo' and Herr Prayuth didn't notice his wife getting dressed in a rush to get down to the event in front of a photograph. Early days though for everybody to 'get with the program'. At least they made an effort to get there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...