10,000 are expected to come for Yingluck ruling

[trainman34014]

43 minutes ago, BasalBanality said:

Mobile cabinet meeting in Korat Aug 22

 

One wonders how long they will be away from Bangkok?

Long enough for them to deny any responsibility should blood be spilt on Judgement day.   Never forget these people are cowards at heart !

[janpharma]

So, she paid 10.000 people to come over...

[robblok]

So, she paid 10.000 people to come over...

Quite possible there are paid ones though others might come for free. But if its organised the chances of it being paid for increase.

If they all come with their own cars no rented busses or vans then i place more stock in true love of YL than a rent a mob.

Lets hope the reds stay peaceful, because otherwise they can't blame the army for casualties.

[Thechook]

48 minutes ago, robblok said:

Quite possible there are paid ones though others might come for free. But if its organised the chances of it being paid for increase.

If they all come with their own cars no rented busses or vans then i place more stock in true love of YL than a rent a mob.

Lets hope the reds stay peaceful, because otherwise they can't blame the army for casualties.
 

Rent a mob term isn't allowed on thaivisa

[NCC1701A]

is there a hotel that over looks the court building?

 

this might be interesting to watch.

 

 

[wakeupplease]

12 hours ago, scorecard said:

 

Well that could mean many things.

 

Including. other countries hoping that there will be a guilty verdict (if the judicial process is seen as fair and balanced and available evidence clearly supports the verdict) as a signal that Thailand is making progress in punishing past high corrupt and immoral governments) being brave enough to sideline private armies etc., and ignore power hungry ruthless absconded criminals, and moving towards being a second / first world country.

I think somewhere in the propaganda you succumbed too, you miss the fact that many countries still say she was/is the elected PM not the one who took power by the barrel of a gun.

 

There are those who think if they say something often enough everyone will believe it The Kim NK syndrome. Then you have the educated who know bullS>>> when they hear it.

 

second / first world country.

 

Laugh Out Loud best joke of the decade

[tryasimight]

10 hours ago, Orac said:

 

She was in Bake n Brew on Soi Excite last wednesday.

 

Bloke on the left is expressing his view quite clearly. I doubt that that is the Churchillian V for Victory sign.

[tryasimight]

4 minutes ago, wakeupplease said:

I think somewhere in the propaganda you succumbed too, you miss the fact that many countries still say she was/is the elected PM not the one who took power by the barrel of a gun.

 

There are those who think if they say something often enough everyone will believe it The Kim NK syndrome. Then you have the educated who know bullS>>> when they hear it.

 

second / first world country.

 

Laugh Out Loud best joke of the decade

She was no longer PM when the coup happened.

[Yinglove]

6 minutes ago, tryasimight said:

Bloke on the left is expressing his view quite clearly. I doubt that that is the Churchillian V for Victory sign.

Yeah, he obviously hates her, the smile gives it away.

[tryasimight]

1 minute ago, Yinglove said:

Yeah, he obviously hates her, the smile gives it away.

Which Thai smile is it though? Many to choose from.

Edited August 13, 2017 by tryasimight

[Dave67]

2 minutes ago, Yinglove said:

Yeah, he obviously hates her, the smile gives it away.

Yes the V sign means something different in UK It dates back to Henry 5 and the battle of Agincourt. The French cut off two fingers of captured English archers, so they could no longer fight. When English defeated the French, who had an Army twice the size of the English. The Archers mocked the captured French and waved 2 fingers at them to show them they could still fight 

[AsianAtHeart]

12 hours ago, scorecard said:

 

Well that could mean many things.

 

Including. other countries hoping that there will be a guilty verdict (if the judicial process is seen as fair and balanced and available evidence clearly supports the verdict) as a signal that Thailand is making progress in punishing past high corrupt and immoral governments) being brave enough to sideline private armies etc., and ignore power hungry ruthless absconded criminals, and moving towards being a second / first world country.

No developed country would laud the punishment of a leader for the unprovoked, unencouraged, unlawful, and uncommanded conduct of his or her underlings--especially when the entire country is known to be predisposed to such corrupt behaviors and that changes can only come slowly over time, one citizen at a time.  If, however, Ms. Yingluck should be found guilty of having not "foreseen" the corruption that might occur, the verdict would implicitly implicate numerous others as well.  The entire allegation against her seems ill-conceived, for it necessarily puts others in the spotlight as well.  Does Thailand have a law that says superiors must always be held guilty for the corruptions of their citizenry?  If so, every official in the country can be prosecuted.  I'm sure other countries would watch such proceedings with interest.

[wakeupplease]

22 minutes ago, tryasimight said:

She was no longer PM when the coup happened.

she was/is the elected PM

 

last elected PM maybe not hard to keep track off as over the decades there have only been a few

[tryasimight]

9 minutes ago, Dave67 said:

Yes the V sign means something different in UK It dates back to Henry 5 and the battle of Agincourt. The French cut off two fingers of captured English archers, so they could no longer fight. When English defeated the French, who had an Army twice the size of the English. The Archers mocked the captured French and waved 2 fingers at them to show them they could still fight 

Correct

[tryasimight]

3 minutes ago, wakeupplease said:

she was/is the elected PM

 

last elected PM maybe not hard to keep track off as over the decades there have only been a few

Incorrect

[wakeupplease]

10 minutes ago, tryasimight said:

Incorrect

Pray tell who was the last elected PM then? I said elected that is by the ballot box not the gun

 

here take you pic

 

23		Thaksin Shinawatra (1949–)	9 February 2001	5 April 2006	5 years, 55 days		Thai Rak Thai	54. Thaksin I	2001
								55. Thaksin II	2005
—		Chitchai Wannasathit (1949–) Acting Prime Minister	5 April 2006	23 May 2006	48 days		Thai Rak Thai		—
(23)		Thaksin Shinawatra (1949–) Caretaker Prime Minister	23 May 2006	19 September 2006	119 days		Thai Rak Thai
—		Sonthi Boonyaratglin (1946–)	19 September 2006	1 October 2006	12 days		Military	Council for National Security (interim)
24		Surayud Chulanont (1943–)	1 October 2006	29 January 2008	1 year, 120 days		Independent	56. Surayud
25		Samak Sundaravej (1935–2009)	29 January 2008	8 September 2008	224 days		People's Power	57. Samak	2007
26		Somchai Wongsawat (1947–)	8 September 2008	2 December 2008	9 days		People's Power		—
					84 days		People's Power	58. Somchai
—		Chaovarat Chanweerakul (1936–) Acting Prime Minister	2 December 2008	15 December 2008	15 days		Independent
27		Abhisit Vejjajiva (1964–)	17 December 2008	5 August 2011	2 years, 231 days		Democrat	59. Abhisit
28		Yingluck Shinawatra (1967–)	5 August 2011	7 May 2014	2 years, 275 days		Pheu Thai	60. Yingluck	2011
—		Niwatthamrong Boonsongpaisan (1948–) Acting Prime Minister	7 May 2014	22 May 2014	15 days		Pheu Thai		—

Edited August 13, 2017 by wakeupplease

[Baerboxer]

On 8/13/2017 at 9:04 AM, Dave67 said:

The world is watching P-Man 

 

You're joking? Sure they'll report the verdict. And some toady old reporters, like at the BBC, may write the usual not quite accurate article, leaving out all the facts that might balance it. 

 

But with NK, Venezuela, Syria, the up coming German election, Brexit, and continued Chinese expansion; and now Trump and the racist rallies in the US, is anyone likely to be bothered much?